Maybe, and even if they are, it's probably not all that much. They're a wedge shape (nothing like the zipp firecrest or the older "hybrid toroidal" profiles) and according to these tests the 2007 zipp 404 only saves you 3.5 watts over the dura ace C24 at 50km/h! The difference between the C50 and the C24 is only 0.3 watts! So rim depth is definitely not everything. You need to also take into account the rim profile, number of spokes, spoke shape etc.biker jk wrote:They will be more aero than standard low profile rims!
Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
- philip
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby philip » Wed May 23, 2012 6:42 pm
- biker jk
- Posts: 7010
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby biker jk » Wed May 23, 2012 7:06 pm
That difference between the C24 and C50 seems incorrect. At 50km, the Shimano RS30 has aero drag of 29.8 watts versus 27 watts for the C50 (according to the Tour magazine test, Q4 2011). So I doubt that the difference between the C24 and C50 would be just 0.3 watts. I also said that the simply shaped C50 was quite a bit more aero than every low profile wheel tested (including wider or more sophisticated rim shapes).philip wrote:Maybe, and even if they are, it's probably not all that much. They're a wedge shape (nothing like the zipp firecrest or the older "hybrid toroidal" profiles) and according to these tests the 2007 zipp 404 only saves you 3.5 watts over the dura ace C24 at 50km/h! The difference between the C50 and the C24 is only 0.3 watts! So rim depth is definitely not everything. You need to also take into account the rim profile, number of spokes, spoke shape etc.biker jk wrote:They will be more aero than standard low profile rims!
- philip
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby philip » Wed May 23, 2012 7:48 pm
I don't think so, they make special mention of the C24 in the Interpretation section. I know you're saying that the C50 (different years/models between these tests remember) is more aero that every low profile wheel that they tested, but my point is that it wouldn't be hard to imagine that a 50mm rim such as these chinese carbon wheels could offer very little benefit (if any at all) over a well designed traditional rim such as the C24 (I'm picking the C24 because that's what I currently use).biker jk wrote:That difference between the C24 and C50 seems incorrect.
Given the results from above, I don't think you can say they will for sure until they have been tested properly.biker jk wrote:They will be more aero than standard low profile rims!
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Wed May 23, 2012 8:51 pm
I'm doubtful there'll be a perceived difference, but you never know....
Personally, I'm just as much motivated by lighter weight as potential aero benefit.
I often wonder about the aero benefit of the rear wheel. Turbulent air flow due to seat tube, legs, and front wheel I imagine undermines any benefit of an aero rear wheel....though I suppose solid dish rears are defacto standards for closed velo TTs.
-
- Posts: 10330
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby Nobody » Thu May 24, 2012 12:09 am
Thanks for linking the test.philip wrote:Maybe, and even if they are, it's probably not all that much. They're a wedge shape (nothing like the zipp firecrest or the older "hybrid toroidal" profiles) and according to these tests the 2007 zipp 404 only saves you 3.5 watts over the dura ace C24 at 50km/h! The difference between the C50 and the C24 is only 0.3 watts! So rim depth is definitely not everything. You need to also take into account the rim profile, number of spokes, spoke shape etc.biker jk wrote:They will be more aero than standard low profile rims!
Now I'm even more convinced that deep profile wheels are more of a fashion item than a performance aid.
- philip
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby philip » Thu May 24, 2012 8:08 am
Hah.. don't get me wrong - a good aero wheel is definitely going to give you a noticeable improvement and will save you time in a TT. But obviously not all deep rims are going to give you the same sort of performance benefits.Nobody wrote:Now I'm even more convinced that deep profile wheels are more of a fashion item than a performance aid.
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14854
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby MichaelB » Thu May 24, 2012 10:01 am
Especially for the average rider.philip wrote:Hah.. don't get me wrong - a good aero wheel is definitely going to give you a noticeable improvement and will save you time in a TT. But obviously not all deep rims are going to give you the same sort of performance benefits.Nobody wrote:Now I'm even more convinced that deep profile wheels are more of a fashion item than a performance aid.
Like me
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Thu May 24, 2012 11:09 am
I'll pick up this afternoon and take for a roll around the home crit track.
Delivery details below for benefit of others who might be interested in ETAs.
And whether this is good or bad remains to be seen, but the weight is significantly under spec (not taped)
front 565 g
rear 707 g
= 1272 grams. .... spec says 1350 +/- 30grams
These have the lighter hubsmith hubs. I did ask Smart at Farsports for an extra good set because I was going to let a few guys in my racing club try them out, and he might get some more orders out of it. But anyway, will see how we go.
- twizzle
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:45 am
- Location: Highlands of Wales.
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby twizzle » Thu May 24, 2012 11:23 am
Guy I race with bought a set of 50mm foam cored carbon clinchers, raced on them a few times, had the rear rim split around the spoke holes on a social ride shortly afterwards. They sent him a new rim, it was being built up into a wheel by a local super-bike-mechanic when it failed before the spokes reached the specified tension.
I was also given some 50mm carbon clincher wheels for parts by a mate, he bought them from Torpedo7, Italian but made by one of the decent Taiwanese manufacturers (I looked them up, they make rims for everyone), rear spoke pulled through the carbon when it was being trued. I'm keeping the front for when I get under the 'safe' limit for the rim of 96kg, but I'll be watching it closely.
There's also a lot of questions about the epoxies used in the 'cheap' rims and wether or not they will survive high-speed descents. Someone on here had a Reynolds fail when he fitted swiss-stop 'yellow' pads, turns out the reynolds brake shoes have ceramic material in them to reduce the braking temp and keep the expoxy from exceeding the temp at which the sidewall of the rim can fail under the pressure of a clincher.
So... don't buy the lightest stuff if you are a heavy rider, and if you are planning on big descents and braking you should go for a tubular rim rather than a clincher as tubulars don't pop the sidewalls off when overheated. Or buy the reynolds pads or other suitable ones designed to keep braking temps down.
...real cyclists don't have squeaky chains...
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Thu May 24, 2012 12:00 pm
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby Parrott » Thu May 24, 2012 12:20 pm
As far as the aero benefit goes it is there for racing. Never heard anyone complain they are slower, and have raced with plenty of people who use them. I am very surprised the difference between the best low profile and deeper profile is that small. I struggle in handicaps without mine, when you are at your limit the difference certainly feels bigger than that test would indicate . If it's placebo it works on my HR as well as my PE
-
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:20 pm
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby Crawf » Thu May 24, 2012 3:43 pm
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:24 am
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby DavidI » Thu May 24, 2012 4:56 pm
You're 100% correct, any aero advantage gained is greater for the front wheel for exactly the reasons you mentioned. If, for whatever reason, you could only run one full disk for example, you're make a far greater aerodynamic gain by putting it on the front.PawPaw wrote:I often wonder about the aero benefit of the rear wheel. Turbulent air flow due to seat tube, legs, and front wheel I imagine undermines any benefit of an aero rear wheel....though I suppose solid dish rears are defacto standards for closed velo TTs.
BUT
a front disk gives you scary handling in crosswinds, which is why they are rarely (if ever) used, except on a velodrome where crosswinds are rarely an issue. They're not even used in mass-start races on the track for the same reasons, as well as full disks being heavier (so no good in, say, a points race where there is a lot of acceleration - TBH not sure if they're even allowed on front except against the clock).
A modern, properly designed deep V wheel will give you nearly as much aero benefit as a full disk with less drastic effect on the handling.
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:43 pm
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby Arlberg » Thu May 24, 2012 6:09 pm
People seem to forget it is not only about the aero benefits with the carbon wheels. The weight benefits are in my opinion more important and provide a greater advantage than the aero benefits. Combine the two and its a no brainer.Parrott wrote:There are a few yishun carbon clinchers in Bendigo, a some with larger riders on them. Haven't heard of any probs.
As far as the aero benefit goes it is there for racing. Never heard anyone complain they are slower, and have raced with plenty of people who use them. I am very surprised the difference between the best low profile and deeper profile is that small. I struggle in handicaps without mine, when you are at your limit the difference certainly feels bigger than that test would indicate . If it's placebo it works on my HR as well as my PE
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Thu May 24, 2012 7:40 pm
Just back from crit training, and I can honestly say from the first time I accelerated, I was floored with how much easier it is to accelerate on the FS 50mmCCs.
But let me qualify that. My previous wheels were stock standard Bontrager Race L, weight ex tape, skewers, tubes and tires? 1920grams!!!
So that's almost a 650 gram difference with the FSs.
I let a mate put them on his bike too and he was really impressed as well, super responsive due to lightness, and very stable at speed.
Reluctantly, he gave me the wheels back, then I did 20 minutes at 30 to 37. Accelerations from 30 were so much easier. Steering felt more stable.
We then started a paceline of 10 guys, at 35 then built to low 40s, rotating through. In the last 2 laps we lifted it to mid 40s then a sprint.
I then did a few gentler sprints out of the saddle afterwards.
The main diff I feel is acceleration has gone from pedaling in tar, to pedaling in air. The difference is profound. I can wind it up from 35 to 40 with significantly less effort.
Drafting and holding line definitely seemed more stable. However, just so you know I am not punch drunk, through the Ss, I did feel like the back slipped sideways a couple of times. It's a feeling I have had with the old wheelset, which was resolved by tightening the cassette lockring.
My bike weight has gone from around 8 to 7.4kg.
OK, first impressions. The tires were already on when i saw them. The rims look nice and uniform, the spokes are stamped Sapim, and are tensioned as I'd expect, (Ashley said the rear needed the slightest attention), the hubs look like a mid priced hub looks.
They spin nicely, the freehub is louder than my Bontragers, but not as loud as many higher priced hubs.
Braking seemed pretty close to my alloys, though I didn't really push them.
OK, the downside:
- The skewers are light, 24grams, vs 67 for my bontragers. The axle might be the spec'ed titanium, but the lever is a very light and soft alloy, very poorly engineered, round and therefore hard to apply pressure to, and has not worked well since the 2nd time I tightened it due to loose clamping action.
- The two spare Sapim spokes they agreed to send and were listed on my invoice were not included.
- I got external nipples. The invoice didn't specify and I can't remember if I did in an email, so will have to check. Internal nipples look better and are apparently more robust, but are more difficult to true (tape has to come off) from what I've been told.
- I discussed the under specc'ed weight with Ashley. He's tested them and feels there's nothing obvious wrong, and affirmed the quality is surprisingly good, and they are stiff. When I talked about spokes being pulled through the rim before specced tension was reached, his response was "ha, that happens with Zipps too".
- Tubular carbon are less likely to have issues with rim distortion or failure during braking, but I'll be riding these on road rides, so didn't want to do tubbies.
I'll be racing on Sat at Lakeside in a reverse direction crit. There's a big hill and I'll be trying breaks with two team mates, so they'll get a nice workout. I'll use another set of skewers and take them for another ride tomorrow morning. I'll take photos of them on my bike tomorrow, but my bike is blue and white, so they aren't a great color match. I'm thinking of getting some white stickers (Lightweight ) to help with the aesthetics.
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Fri May 25, 2012 6:36 pm
Hubsmith front axle. Very light but rolls as good as quality hubs. No space between J bends and flange holes indicating snug fit.
Nice carbon weave and joins.
I've taken these tires off and put them on my training wheels. The CCs now have Conti GP 4000s front and back.
If I decide to use these wheels primarily for criterium track racing and training, I'll put 195g Schwalbe ZX ($37) on rear and 170g ZLX ($34) on front.
The dodgy skewers
- ozdavo
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:03 pm
- Location: Gold Coast (nth)
Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby ozdavo » Fri May 25, 2012 8:32 pm
What exactly is wrong with the skewers? & is that F or R at 24g?PawPaw wrote: The dodgy skewers
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Fri May 25, 2012 9:21 pm
See two posts back, and if that's not clear, the alloy of the ball shaped hinge mechanism is so soft, it was gouged into when first levered close; and it is now difficult to lever closed fully, and even more difficult to open.ozdavo wrote:What exactly is wrong with the skewers? & is that F or R at 24g?
Front skewer.
- ozdavo
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:03 pm
- Location: Gold Coast (nth)
Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby ozdavo » Fri May 25, 2012 9:41 pm
Thanks, (and all I got from your earlier post is it didn't work due to soft alloy after 2nd use). I only ask as I'm currently using a light set (44g total) on my new build: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 0&t=101518PawPaw wrote:See two posts back, and if that's not clear, the alloy of the ball shaped hinge mechanism is so soft, it was gouged into when first levered close; and it is now difficult to lever closed fully, and even more difficult to open.ozdavo wrote:What exactly is wrong with the skewers? & is that F or R at 24g?
Front skewer.
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Fri May 25, 2012 11:30 pm
Your bike looks good. What frame is that and did you buy it new for $300?ozdavo wrote:I only ask as I'm currently using a light set (44g total) on my new build: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... 0&t=101518
I think the Conti GP 4000s are an excellent combo of lightweight and durability, though you could go lighter if primarily using the bike for racing.
suggestions for weight savings
Farsport 38mm CCs 1250 +/- 30g (bracciano are 1482)
lighter frame and fork.
only tape the drops and not the bars.
Be interested to hear how comfortable you are on the carbon saddle.
-
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 11:41 am
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby Abby » Sat May 26, 2012 11:48 am
Thanks for all the details on your new wheels - I've been tempted for a while, and its great to see some decent pics and a good review...!!
When Ashley (from Planet, I'm guessing?) checked over the wheels, did he actually have to do anything to them in the end? Or did he just check them over and leave them as is?
Don't suppose you are racing at the Metro road race tomorrow? I'll keep an eye out for you and your new wheels if you are...
Cheers,
Abby
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Sat May 26, 2012 1:08 pm
If you've seriously been considering Chinese, and you have sram or shimano groupset, you're quite welcome to meet me one afternoon at Nundah Dome, and do a few laps with the wheels on your bike.
-> Ashley McGowan, High Gear Racing, Alderley.
- ozdavo
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:03 pm
- Location: Gold Coast (nth)
Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby ozdavo » Sat May 26, 2012 11:10 pm
Thanks ;-PPawPaw wrote: Your bike looks good. What frame is that and did you buy it new for $300?
I think the Conti GP 4000s are an excellent combo of lightweight and durability, though you could go lighter if primarily using the bike for racing.
suggestions for weight savings
Farsport 38mm CCs 1250 +/- 30g (bracciano are 1482)
lighter frame and fork.
only tape the drops and not the bars.
Be interested to hear how comfortable you are on the carbon saddle.
Got the frame & fork on eBay from some guy in Sydney. His sales history indicated he had sold a few of these frames and the add said it was his last one. I paid $300 posted. Some on WW said it is a Figmo 900? I really have know idea, other than its tight, stiff and non compliant.
I'm happy with the bracciano's at the moment, but I would mind getting a set of aero rims sometime down the track & will keep the far sports in mind.
I'm actually quite happy with the weight so am not looking to drop any more weight other than in a new stem & cutting the steerer further once I have the fit sorted; and I only plan on wrapping half the bars, which will suit them as they are wing style with cable guides under the tops.
I looked long and hard for the "right" saddle, primarily based on reviews etc. the one I choose was not the lightest nor cheapest, but had the best reviews for comfort and the rear X-wing design where the rails join the saddle in a single point at the rear centre allowing for greater flex in the carbon seemed to support this. The longest ride I've done on it has only been 52k, but all good so far.
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby PawPaw » Mon May 28, 2012 7:57 am
Of a group of 40, 5 of us had deep sections.
The wheels went very well though rear wheel seemed to have minor vibratory rattle on the rougher bitumen. It wasn't loose spokes either. I think it is just that they are lighter and hollow under the carbon rim (I presume), so some noises are magnified. Apart from that, I am still amazed at how much easier it is to accelerate, a primary function of 650g lighter wheel weight.
-
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:39 pm
Re: Chinese carbon frame and wheels thread
Postby steve-waters » Mon May 28, 2012 9:05 am
MTB:TWE 29er, Fox Terralogic, XT, 3T and TWE wheels
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.