Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

User avatar
casual_cyclist
Posts: 7758
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:41 am
Location: Kewdale

Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby casual_cyclist » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:43 pm

I will start with the ugly, a sign no cyclist wants to see... from the basement of my building:

Image
<removed by request>

george-bob
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:01 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby george-bob » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:40 pm

How...how do they expect you to do both those things?
Image

User avatar
casual_cyclist
Posts: 7758
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:41 am
Location: Kewdale

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby casual_cyclist » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:43 pm

george-bob wrote:How...how do they expect you to do both those things?
And also swipe in? dunno. be handbidextrous?
<removed by request>

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Aushiker » Thu Nov 21, 2013 4:20 pm

Image

Image

Image

Andrew

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Aushiker » Thu Nov 21, 2013 4:26 pm

Image

Image

Andrew

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Aushiker » Sat Nov 23, 2013 1:30 pm

Image

Andrew

human909
Posts: 9810
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby human909 » Sat Nov 23, 2013 1:58 pm

This sign has been a semi permanent fixture for most of this year. :roll:

Image

I haven't yet seen a cyclist obey that sign and dismount in the middle of the road! :shock:

User avatar
Ross
Posts: 5742
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:53 pm

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Ross » Sat Nov 23, 2013 2:54 pm

Image

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby trailgumby » Sat Nov 23, 2013 7:12 pm

SO these are in the "bad" category.
Ross wrote:Image
Believe it or not, motorists view this as an admonition to cyclists not to get in the way of cars and stay on the side of the road.

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Mulger bill » Sat Nov 23, 2013 7:16 pm

human909 wrote:This sign has been a semi permanent fixture for most of this year. :roll:

Image

I haven't yet seen a cyclist obey that sign and dismount in the middle of the road! :shock:

Those mongrels seem to be breeding like "Rough Surface" signs, there's one close by in Abbotsford St.

Yet to see a "Stop engine-get out and push" sign but one can dream...
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Aushiker » Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:11 pm

Image

Image

Image

Andrew

User avatar
find_bruce
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10599
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby find_bruce » Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:44 pm

Mulger bill wrote:
human909 wrote:This sign has been a semi permanent fixture for most of this year. :roll:

Image

I haven't yet seen a cyclist obey that sign and dismount in the middle of the road! :shock:

Those mongrels seem to be breeding like "Rough Surface" signs, there's one close by in Abbotsford St.

Yet to see a "Stop engine-get out and push" sign but one can dream...
Or pedestrians must do 10 star jumps here. Despite the authoritative use of the word must, the signs appear to be completely unenforceable in any Australian jurisdiction. Further there is no such person as a dismounted cyclist - a person walking alongside a bicycle is a pedestrian. But the lack of enforceability will not stop numbies putting up meaningless signs
Anything you can do, I can do slower

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Mulger bill » Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:26 pm

find_bruce wrote:Or pedestrians must do 10 star jumps here.
:shock: Ambulance response times here are bad enough as it is, you want large proportions of the populace keeling over in the streets after chucking a heartie?

On the bright side, Vic has the best Ambos in the country, total dedication to the job. Why else would they put up with so much crap for so many hours a shift for so little money?

HEY! NAPTIME!
Yeah you, the bemused vet...

Pay these real heroes what they're bloody well worth. Canning the E-W cash pit should cover the costs for the rest of my lifetime.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
outnabike
Posts: 2455
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:53 pm
Location: Melbourne Vic

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby outnabike » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:37 pm

Taken 6 weeks ago.Oct 2013
Image
Vivente World Randonneur complete with panniers

User avatar
BianchiCam
Posts: 667
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Location: Sunny Coast. Oop Norf!

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby BianchiCam » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:56 pm

trailgumby wrote:SO these are in the "bad" category.
Ross wrote:Image
Believe it or not, motorists view this as an admonition to cyclists not to get in the way of cars and stay on the side of the road.

I saw similar ones in Bright. Both signs are yellow so I was wondering, is the onus on the cyclist or cars?

Graeme H
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:36 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Graeme H » Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:39 am

Image

Could mean anything.

User avatar
g-boaf
Posts: 21456
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby g-boaf » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:33 am

Ross wrote:Image
That means that cyclists must get out of the way of cars or else. :roll:

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Aushiker » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:45 am

Image

Andrew

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Aushiker » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:42 am



Andrew

User avatar
InTheWoods
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby InTheWoods » Mon Nov 25, 2013 1:51 pm

Share the road signs do suck.

Re cyclists dismount signs, in Queensland they are the G9-58 sign. G series signs are guides, they are not regulatory like R series signs. The G9-58's are meant to be used as reminders of the need to dismount at a ped crossing, or as warnings for some kind of danger. The blurb in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices says:
This sign should be used where necessary to remind cyclists that they are required to dismount before crossing a road on a pedestrian crossing, a childrens crossing or a marked pedestrian crosswalk at traffic signals. The sign may also be used to warn cyclists to dismount before reaching a particular place at or beyond which it would be hazardous to continue riding. A second sign indicating the reason for the warning should, where appropriate, be mounted below this sign.
Not dismounting is not an offence as it is only a guide sign. Separate to this, ignoring the sign and crossing at a pedestrian crossing without dismounting can still earn you a ticket, but that's an actual road rule that's been broken, rather than the sign.

User avatar
casual_cyclist
Posts: 7758
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:41 am
Location: Kewdale

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby casual_cyclist » Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:49 pm

Aushiker wrote:
Cyclists dismount and what?
<removed by request>

User avatar
coyote
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:33 pm
Location: Cairns - Queensland

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby coyote » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:38 pm

[quote="Mulger bill] On the bright side, Vic has the best Ambos in the country, total dedication to the job. Why else would they put up with so much crap for so many hours a shift for so little money?

Image

Pay these real heroes what they're bloody well worth. Canning the E-W cash pit should cover the costs for the rest of my lifetime.[/quote]

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Aushiker » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:05 am

From the Munda Biddi Trail

Image

Image

Image

Image

Andrew

Graeme H
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:36 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby Graeme H » Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:01 am

Image

User avatar
antigee
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:58 am
Location: just off the Yarra Trail but not lurking in the bushes

Re: Cycling related signs - good/bad/ugly

Postby antigee » Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:39 am

Image

.....more of these please


Image

someone should drown the guy who took the photo and didn't quite get it in frame :oops: but think it makes sense

Image

being vertically challenged and still many decades later suffering from being a small kid and getting left out I worry about this sign

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users