1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15589
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby AUbicycles » Fri Feb 09, 2018 10:31 pm
For a large gear range, 2 chainrings it has been the standard solution for and let's a road rider crawl up a steep mountain at snails pace but fly back down the other side like the wind.
However the front derailleur is yet another mechanical element that adds complexity and where things can go wrong. In MTBing they have really pushed for solutions to so there are chain tensioners or planetary gears up front. But the trend is towards 1x and a good range at the back. A challenge of having a large gear range and big cassette is drive train efficiency - of you think about cross-chaining (chain is in the big chain ring up front but crosses diagonally to the big cog on the rear cassette) a straight chain-line is always better.
In the world of road bikes, we are hearing 1x more often and Alex Simmons mentioned in the Disc Brake thread that in Herald Sun Tour the Aqua Blue were riding with 1x... and this creates a new technical challenge as the gearing is different so if there is a wheel change - you can't just put on any wheel - it has to suit the 1x.
But 1x will save you from the chain dropping as well. Remember Contador and Chaingate (short video).
So what is your take on 1x for road bikes. Does it simply it and make life easier? Do you think you are now loosing gears and the range you are used to? Will it take off or is it just a fad?
- Derny Driver
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:18 pm
- Location: Wollongong
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Derny Driver » Fri Feb 09, 2018 10:55 pm
How hard is it to have a front derailleur? Di2 front mechs are faultless.
Why would you want to drop 30 cadence points every time you change gears.
Those cassettes must be the most awful thing ever invented for a bike I reckon.
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:42 pm
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Jmuzz » Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:10 pm
Because electrical motors are going to dominate the rest of the market. Gearing is now purely for sports physical challenge, commute, tour, downhill (the uphill bit) and even recreation all benefit from motors.
The motor negates the need for close gearing steps and gearing losses become less important. So the fragile high maintenance gears setup will go, 1x front with 4x gears in the hub with motor. Or indirect drive with generator in the crank and no more chain which many commuters will love.
There won't be any need for sport to improve gearing, through they will have to go to disk and add suspension to stay relevant as a marketing tool for the manufacturers.
Will the sport add motors eventually? I think so, otherwise what are they advertising for the manufacturers? Some system where they start with 0% battery so it's all their own power but how they store and unleash that power is still quite a good race. Lots of good shorts for the news report on breakaways and high speed sprints.
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby NASHIE » Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:25 pm
Agree, have been riding as 1x (removed front derailleur) for last couple of years while my son rides junior gearing to keep it fair, and while the 42 12/25 is fine for me and Perth hills, i could not cope with the spacing an 11/32 etc gives that would need for the bigger hills you guys get over east. And you won't be winning any sprints. CX and MTBs yes, serious roadies no.Derny Driver wrote:For road bikes - absolutely a backward step.
How hard is it to have a front derailleur? Di2 front mechs are faultless.
Why would you want to drop 30 cadence points every time you change gears.
Those cassettes must be the most awful thing ever invented for a bike I reckon.
-
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:36 pm
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Kronos » Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:00 am
However, its a good problem to have because I can work out (eventually) whether I just want to spin effortlessly, or whether I want a slower cadence and more power per revolution. Its a good problem because spinning a bigger or a smaller cog works different muscle groups in your legs and you can rest them in between to maintain a higher speed.
I don't know exactly how that will work with a 1x but I'm willing to try it if someone wants to lend me a bike with a 1x groupset.
- bychosis
- Posts: 7271
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby bychosis » Sat Feb 10, 2018 6:50 am
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby find_bruce » Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:53 am
But that's something you can also do with Di2.
What I am not seeing for 1x is any major advantage for road bikes
- andrewjcw
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:56 pm
- Location: Newcastle, NSW
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby andrewjcw » Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:11 am
- WyvernRH
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:41 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby WyvernRH » Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:52 am
Ah... marketing/sales have done a good job thenandrewjcw wrote:Well, there's no 'major advantage' for them on mtb/cx bikes, but that hasn't stopped them becoming very popular there.
No seriously, I can't see the problem with 2/3 chainrings up front and a closer block at the back. I have no problems doing a front change under load even on non-indexed bikes and the weight difference is going to be minimal - most 1x setups I have seen still retain the heavy indexed l/h lever (which you don't need anyway - why index a 2 position switch?)
The main thing that puts me off 1x with huge rear sprockets is the need for a 'clutched' rear derailleur. Now that is unnecessary added complication and point of failure if you will. I have never seen a front changer fail they are very basic, the sledgehammer of gear changing mechanisms (DI2 excepted)
I spent a fair amount of my youth touring Britain on a 1x (44x14-32 6 speed) and when I finally got a TA chainset with a 32 inner it was a a revelation . Riding over the Pennines without walking! Now I'm older I need the bail out gear....
If you race your views might well differ of course.
Richard
-
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: Watching the ships on the Southern Ocean
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby ball bearing » Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:35 am
- andrewjcw
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:56 pm
- Location: Newcastle, NSW
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby andrewjcw » Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:59 pm
Over the last 10 years triple chain rings have become known as cheap and nasty and for beginner bikes, so it's a natural progression to continue that to make 2 -> 1.
Apart of that is that in general mountain bikes have gone from general purpose/walking track and fire trail riding to heavier purpose built machines where 140mm+ dual suspension and big tyres are normal. With that they just don't need the higher gears so the lack of range isn't really a problem. On a lot of trails you don't need to pedal at faster than 35 km/h.
Lastly, and of course mainly as with most cycling things, it's just about looking good. Fixie's/SS are very cool and trendy now and people with 1x love getting a differenct colour chain or anodized chain holder or things that just make it look cool and different.
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby RonK » Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:17 pm
Perhaps your judgment is a bit hasty. The front derailleur is eliminated to improve aerodynamics around the bottom bracket.Derny Driver wrote:For road bikes - absolutely a backward step.
How hard is it to have a front derailleur? Di2 front mechs are faultless.
Why would you want to drop 30 cadence points every time you change gears.
Those cassettes must be the most awful thing ever invented for a bike I reckon.
And there is no dropping "30 cadence points every gear change". The cassettes they use have a quite reasonable progression.
The story here: Just In: 3T Strada - the future just arrived in the road.cc bike shed3T has developed its own 9-32 cassettes in two versions, called Bailout and Overdrive, that have been developed to address some of the gaps between sprockets that can occur on such wide range cassettes.
The Bailout has 9-10-11-12-13-15-17-19-22-26-32 tooth sprockets. You’ll notice that the sprockets increase in size just one tooth at a time at the business end of the cassette with an “oh shite this is a steep hill” bailout sprocket at the other end. The Overdrive has a 9-11-12-13-15-17-19-22-25-28-32 configuration aimed at providing evenly spaced gears across the middle of the cassette with that 9-tooth sprocket for keeping the power on during big descents.
Anf here is their full review of the 3T Strada: 3T Strada frameset
- ValleyForge
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:37 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby ValleyForge » Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:22 pm
Sorry - A company.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:28 pm
There's no guarantee 1x prevents chain drops. Ask David Millar about his loss in a TdF TT while riding 1x, and with less cross chaining than a 1x.AUbicycles wrote:But 1x will save you from the chain dropping as well. Remember Contador and Chaingate (short video).
The problem with 1x in road racing is two fold IMO:
- neutral spares and availability of compatible wheels (only so many wheel options in a car, let alone the spares motorbike
- the large differences between gears. For some gear options, the jump is more than double that of a 2x option, e.g the 9,11,12... cassette.
No matter, pros ride what they are required to ride, not what's optimal. For that reason I don't suggest people make choices about their cycling kit on the basis of what pros use.
Advantages are some simplification due to removal of the front mech, a little weight saving but ho hum, bikes are already at the minimum weight anyway, it just has to be added elsewhere.
But on the other hand, you'll likely have to change the front chainring from day to day depending on the terrain/conditions.
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby RonK » Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:35 pm
Which company do you mean? You can have your 3t Strada with Shimano or Sram.ValleyForge wrote:I can't help but think this is driven by companies that cannot make a working FD.
Sorry - A company.
- Derny Driver
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:18 pm
- Location: Wollongong
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Derny Driver » Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:52 pm
Sorry but I dont call that reasonable. No 14 or 16 tooth cog on a road bike? The 14, 15 and 16 are the most used cogs for nearly every rider.RonK wrote: The cassettes they use have a quite reasonable progression.
3T has developed its own 9-32 cassettes in two versions, called Bailout and Overdrive, that have been developed to address some of the gaps between sprockets that can occur on such wide range cassettes.
The Bailout has 9-10-11-12-13-15-17-19-22-26-32 tooth sprockets. You’ll notice that the sprockets increase in size just one tooth at a time at the business end of the cassette with an “oh shite this is a steep hill” bailout sprocket at the other end. The Overdrive has a 9-11-12-13-15-17-19-22-25-28-32 configuration aimed at providing evenly spaced gears across the middle of the cassette with that 9-tooth sprocket for keeping the power on during big descents.
They need a 9 cog because 40-9 is roughly equivalent to 50-11 or 53-12.
The "bail out" 32 cog with the 48 ring is only equivalent to 36-24 on a mid compact, or 39-26 on a standard chainset.
Since the most common question on BNA is "How can I get a 32 cog on my compact chainset", then it appears many punters are after 27 gear inches bail out, which would be a 46 tooth cog on the single ring drive. Show us the gaps on a 9 to 46 cassette!
Alex has nailed it as usual.
PS Ron ... the un-named company who cant get a front mech to work starts with an S, ends in M, and has two letters in between.
- uart
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby uart » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:20 pm
-
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:36 pm
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby eeksll » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:26 pm
I don't notice it so much when riding the MTB
I run my chainring on the inner side and it doesn't like engaging the smallest sprocket.uart wrote:I was wondering about chain alignment. Aren't you going to be cross chaining most of the time on one of those setups?
I guess in a true 1x setup it would be dead center of cassette so might get another cog out on the same chain angle?
- ValleyForge
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:37 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby ValleyForge » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:34 pm
"If I want to sound like I'm changing gears in a truck, then I'll buy a truck"RonK wrote:Which company do you mean? You can have your 3t Strada with Shimano or Sram.ValleyForge wrote:I can't help but think this is driven by companies that cannot make a working FD.
Sorry - A company.
Even my kids noticed how poorly SRAM works. And my wife!
-
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:36 pm
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Kronos » Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:40 pm
A bike will shift as well as the rider allows it to. I run a SRAM Rival and Shimano Ultegra groupset on my bikes. I have no issue with shifting gears, you might need to learn how to shift properly. I have more issue with Shimano using both the brake lever and the shifter to shift. It's about the most ridiculous implementation I can think of. Oh hello misshift say hello to your face plant. It's relatively easy to grab your brake lever during the shift process. Shifters should never be on brake levers, it's a disaster waiting to happen.ValleyForge wrote:"If I want to sound like I'm changing gears in a truck, then I'll buy a truck"RonK wrote:Which company do you mean? You can have your 3t Strada with Shimano or Sram.ValleyForge wrote:I can't help but think this is driven by companies that cannot make a working FD.
Sorry - A company.
Even my kids noticed how poorly SRAM works. And my wife!
One day you're gonna panic and go arse over tit. To be honest I can shift proficiently on both systems but the double tap mechanism is so much safer and more efficient than the Ultegra one every time I even slightly grab some brake lever as you will do occasionally I swear at my Shimano bike.
-
- Posts: 1878
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:46 am
- Location: Southeast Tasmania
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby LG » Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:48 pm
I like your sense of humor, well I hope it is.Kronos wrote:A bike will shift as well as the rider allows it to. I run a SRAM Rival and Shimano Ultegra groupset on my bikes. I have no issue with shifting gears, you might need to learn how to shift properly. I have more issue with Shimano using both the brake lever and the shifter to shift. It's about the most ridiculous implementation I can think of. Oh hello misshift say hello to your face plant. It's relatively easy to grab your brake lever during the shift process. Shifters should never be on brake levers, it's a disaster waiting to happen.ValleyForge wrote:"If I want to sound like I'm changing gears in a truck, then I'll buy a truck"RonK wrote: Which company do you mean? You can have your 3t Strada with Shimano or Sram.
Even my kids noticed how poorly SRAM works. And my wife!
One day you're gonna panic and go arse over tit.
-
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:36 pm
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Kronos » Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:49 pm
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby RonK » Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:17 pm
Meh - I have bikes with Campy, Shimano and Sram. The Sram equipped bike shifts at least as smoothly and quietly as any of them, both the front and rear derailleurs, and the Sram double tap shifter is far more ergonomic.ValleyForge wrote:"If I want to sound like I'm changing gears in a truck, then I'll buy a truck"RonK wrote:Which company do you mean? You can have your 3t Strada with Shimano or Sram.ValleyForge wrote:I can't help but think this is driven by companies that cannot make a working FD.
Sorry - A company.
Even my kids noticed how poorly SRAM works. And my wife!
-
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:36 pm
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby Kronos » Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:38 pm
-
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:45 pm
Re: 1x for Road Bikes - is it real?
Postby BJL » Sat Feb 10, 2018 6:02 pm
I was wondering about this as well. A few months ago, a post appeared on one of the cycling forums (might have even been this one), showing patents by both SRAM and Shimano to deal with this. From memory, on the SRAM the angle of the chainring would 'float' ('yaw' I think, working similar to a CV joint) and the Shimano chainring would 'float' on a splined crank allowing it to move left and right.uart wrote:I was wondering about chain alignment. Aren't you going to be cross chaining most of the time on one of those setups?
I haven't a clue if either will see the light of day. If either does, hopefully we'll get a new BB standard or two as well.
I'm sitting on the fence on this one. I won't knock it till Ive tried it.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Mr Purple
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.