Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
- bychosis
- Posts: 7269
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby bychosis » Mon May 28, 2018 10:36 pm
- andrewjcw
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:56 pm
- Location: Newcastle, NSW
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby andrewjcw » Tue May 29, 2018 6:43 am
-
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:11 am
- Location: Inglewood
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby owly » Tue May 29, 2018 7:13 am
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby Duck! » Tue May 29, 2018 9:19 am
Definitely. The slower the flash rate, the harder it is to judge.andrewjcw wrote:I'm also in the steady camp, at least for the front. The big reason other than it being annoying is I find it much harder to gauge distance/direction/speed of a flashing light compared to a steady light.
While driving one night a few weekes ago, a came upon a cyclist who had what I consider a downright dangerous - to him - rear light. It would give two quick flashes, but then had a really long interval before the next pair of flashes, so he's disappear for several seconds, and a cyclist at speed can cover a lot of ground in that time. Plus with such a long dark phase, you don't immediately recognise it as a bike at first sight.
- ValleyForge
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:37 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby ValleyForge » Tue May 29, 2018 10:13 am
Seems legit.
-
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:08 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby RobertL » Tue May 29, 2018 10:56 am
And...bychosis wrote:Plus one on using a steady beam on the roads so they think I’m a motorbike. I assume that drivers think a bicycle is slow and they will have time to pull out in front of me. If they think I’m a motor bike they think I’m 1: faster and 2: heavier and will cause more damage.
3. Might be a big scary bikie who will cause them physical harm.
-
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:13 am
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby AdelaidePeter » Tue May 29, 2018 11:00 pm
But on the minus side, they might feel less inclined to give you a metre when passing. (Admittedly this applies mostly to the tail light).bychosis wrote:Plus one on using a steady beam on the roads so they think I’m a motorbike. I assume that drivers think a bicycle is slow and they will have time to pull out in front of me. If they think I’m a motor bike they think I’m 1: faster and 2: heavier and will cause more damage.
Anyway, on my way home in twilight tonight I counted 14 flashing rear lights (plus 1 on a pedestrian) and 0 non-flashing ones, on paths. Front lights were a mix and I lost count.
- bychosis
- Posts: 7269
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby bychosis » Wed May 30, 2018 6:22 am
Perhaps I should have clarified. My comment was for front lighting. I usually have blinking rear because it says ‘slow bicycle’AdelaidePeter wrote:But on the minus side, they might feel less inclined to give you a metre when passing. (Admittedly this applies mostly to the tail light).bychosis wrote:Plus one on using a steady beam on the roads so they think I’m a motorbike. I assume that drivers think a bicycle is slow and they will have time to pull out in front of me. If they think I’m a motor bike they think I’m 1: faster and 2: heavier and will cause more damage.
Anyway, on my way home in twilight tonight I counted 14 flashing rear lights (plus 1 on a pedestrian) and 0 non-flashing ones, on paths. Front lights were a mix and I lost count.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21450
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby g-boaf » Wed May 30, 2018 11:52 am
Since when did Australia get a Deutsches Institut für Normung? Or when did DIN get authority over our Standards Australia?ValleyForge wrote:I only recently discovered the German sTVZO standard specifies a steady rear light. Being a fan of flashing rear lights (Lupine Rotlicht), made me wonder. The logic is a steady rear light helps motorists to judge distance better.
Seems legit.
- AndreB1972
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:14 am
- Location: North Lakes - Brisbane
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby AndreB1972 » Wed May 30, 2018 3:38 pm
I sometimes commute on a motorbike and the attitude towards them is similar to a bicycle. I frequently get SMIDSY and clueless behaviour, so not sure that will help you...bychosis wrote:Plus one on using a steady beam on the roads so they think I’m a motorbike. I assume that drivers think a bicycle is slow and they will have time to pull out in front of me. If they think I’m a motor bike they think I’m 1: faster and 2: heavier and will cause more damage.
I noticed some of the newer rear lights have a pulse function, so its always on, but then dims slightly so you get the change of intensity to distinguish you from the rest of the traffic. Not sure if they work, but they appear to be less intense for bike path use, but still attention grabbing when you switch to the road.
-
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:13 am
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby AdelaidePeter » Wed May 30, 2018 7:33 pm
So for "mainly bike path" - implying some interaction with roads - I'm leaving both lights on flashing. Perhaps it would be different if it's 100% off road or the path had zero lighting.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6621
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby Thoglette » Wed May 30, 2018 7:39 pm
Since when did NSW get authority over the rest of the country to allow flashing bike lights in the first place ? (Actually, I know the answer to that.)g-boaf wrote:Since when did Australia get a Deutsches Institut für Normung? Or when did DIN get authority over our Standards Australia?ValleyForge wrote:I only recently discovered the German sTVZO standard specifies a steady rear light. Being a fan of flashing rear lights (Lupine Rotlicht), made me wonder. The logic is a steady rear light helps motorists to judge distance better.
Seems legit.
And I also know what the ADRs say about flashing lights: they are for emergency vehicles only.
Mind you, if we were to drop our "but Australia is so special" viewpoint the DIN standards would make some sense. After all, Standards Australia has been moving everything to mirror IEC standards. They're still called AS/NZS but they're IEC. No prizes for guessing where the royalties go, either.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby NASHIE » Wed May 30, 2018 8:06 pm
i ride solid all round, but don't really mind flashing, If they not the super bright, pointing in your face type. I get the same sort of numbers 30%-40% solid, 40-50% flashing and 10% ninja. Out of the flashing 10-20% are very distracting and i let them know. Worst are the guys with a solid and a flashing pointing straight at your head.AdelaidePeter wrote:Another thought as I rode home tonight (where the numbers I counted were 6 solid front lights, 10 flashing front lights): on most routes I know, the bike path crosses some roads, and occasionally uses the roads. Twice tonight, an oncoming car driver had to see me and give way. So I was glad to have my front light flashing, because it helps visibility.
So for "mainly bike path" - implying some interaction with roads - I'm leaving both lights on flashing. Perhaps it would be different if it's 100% off road or the path had zero lighting.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21450
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby g-boaf » Wed May 30, 2018 8:26 pm
When did NSW ever do anything about allowing or disallowing flashing bike lights?Thoglette wrote:Since when did NSW get authority over the rest of the country to allow flashing bike lights in the first place ? (Actually, I know the answer to that.)g-boaf wrote:Since when did Australia get a Deutsches Institut für Normung? Or when did DIN get authority over our Standards Australia?ValleyForge wrote:I only recently discovered the German sTVZO standard specifies a steady rear light. Being a fan of flashing rear lights (Lupine Rotlicht), made me wonder. The logic is a steady rear light helps motorists to judge distance better.
Seems legit.
And I also know what the ADRs say about flashing lights: they are for emergency vehicles only.
Mind you, if we were to drop our "but Australia is so special" viewpoint the DIN standards would make some sense. After all, Standards Australia has been moving everything to mirror IEC standards. They're still called AS/NZS but they're IEC. No prizes for guessing where the royalties go, either.
I do dislike flashing front lights at night, they are very bad. I'll only have mine flashing in conditions where there is already adequate ambient light around that they won't be irritating. Otherwise they are on solid. I'm not now commuting at the times when I need to worry about riding in absolute darkness and I'm not riding at night anymore so I don't have to worry about that anyway.
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby Duck! » Wed May 30, 2018 8:46 pm
ADRs (Australian Design Rules) are not road rules. The road rules state that bike lights may be steady or flashing.Thoglette wrote: Since when did NSW get authority over the rest of the country to allow flashing bike lights in the first place ? (Actually, I know the answer to that.)
And I also know what the ADRs say about flashing lights: they are for emergency vehicles only.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6621
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby Thoglette » Wed May 30, 2018 9:54 pm
Fixed that for you.Duck! wrote:ADRs (Australian Design Rules) are not road rules. The road rules NOW state that bike lights may be steady or flashing.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby Duck! » Wed May 30, 2018 10:11 pm
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 12:32 pm
- Location: Launceston
Re: Lighting etiquette for mainly bike path
Postby Shred11 » Thu May 31, 2018 12:56 pm
Having said all that, my regular commute starts with about 3km of fast (50km/h) downhill riding on a moderately busy main road through an urban area. It's not uncommon for drivers (particularly those in SUVs) to reverse out of their driveways on cold Winter mornings with all the windows covered in dew or frost. I guess these special people rely on seeing the car headlights through the murk and have no idea that there are other non motorised road users traveling at relatively high speeds. On that section of my commute, I have a blinky front light "set to stun". I suspect that it has now saved me from a few collisions.
Once I leave the road and start on the shared path, I have both the front and rear lights set to low brightness and constantly on. The pedestrians and other cyclists seem to appreciate it.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bychosis
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.