Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 2:39 pm
- Location: Perth
Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby archetuthus » Wed Nov 05, 2014 3:53 pm
http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/cycli ... 1h9ez.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22395
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Aushiker » Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Not good. Help is needed in identifying the cyclist. A reminder to always carry ID.archetuthus wrote:According to the News and 6PR a Female Cyclist was hit buy an SUV on Kings Park Road this morning. She is current in hospital in Critical Condition. Wish her all the luck and hope she comes out ok.
http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/cycli ... 1h9ez.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Also I noted these comment in the article ... a plus for reporting the bicycle rider being hit by the vehicle instead of the other way round
andPolice are trying to trace the identity of a female cyclist in a critical condition in Royal Perth Hospital after being hit by a car in West Perth on Wednesday morning....
AndrewSenior Constable Allan Mawdesley said the driver's mobile phone had been seized and that police were looking into the possibility she was using it immediately prior to the incident.
Aushiker.com
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:51 pm
At this stage taking a look at her mobile probably is an indication of little excpet it was an accident with no obvious reason. I imagine that that is fairly normal to do so just as taking a breathalyser reading of a motorist involved in a serious incident is.
Tragedies like this certainly seem to be a far more common than, say, a decade ago.
- outnabike
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:53 pm
- Location: Melbourne Vic
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby outnabike » Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:07 pm
No different to checking the tyres for braking ability ,the brakes, or a breath test. The police would have all those bases covered.
Most folk have a phone on them and it would be a pretty normal thing to check. some things are written in a suggestive way to make us tut tut a bit.
Lets hope the poor lady gets through the ordeal.
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22395
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Aushiker » Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:14 pm
(1) Mobile phones are not normally mentioned in the press reports I have seen but in this instance the Police Officer specifically mentioned it ...ColinOldnCranky wrote:At this stage taking a look at her mobile probably is an indication of little excpet it was an accident with no obvious reason. I imagine that that is fairly normal to do so just as taking a breathalyser reading of a motorist involved in a serious incident is.
(2)Senior Constable Allan Mawdesley said the driver's mobile phone had been seized and that police were looking into the possibility she was using it immediately prior to the incident.
(3)The cyclist - believed to be in her 50s - was not carrying any identification when she was struck from behind by a silver Toyota Rav4 travelling west along Kings Park Road just before 10am.
Putting one with two and maybe adding in three I would suggest that there is reasonable evidence to suggest a mobile phone may have played a role in this crash.Mr McQueen said the female driver of the car, estimated to be in her late 20s or early 30s, was "screaming" and hysterical.
As to your comment on checking mobile phone usage. I can only comment based on my own experience (and of course your own experience might be different) but with every single instance I have reported to the Police I have never been asked about whether I observed a mobile phone was being used nor have I been asked if I had video evidence of same and that is despite providing video evidence of the incident of concern, i.e., I have never been asked for video showing the driver specifically so I am not so sure it is a standard procedure at all. I know with my partners crash ( a person drove through a stop sign) it never came up in any questioning of her account of the incident.
Also with the Coles driver incident it was shown that it is very hard to prove mobile phone usage contributed to the incident and from what is observed in respect to Police handling of incidents where it is hard to substantial an aspect it seems to be quickly not given serious consideration.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:40 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby citywomble » Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:57 pm
I always recommend that my friends get the mobile number of anyone "so that I can call you later );" that they have an accident with - and then ring it immediately. That sets a time record which places the time of accident, and any prior use on the phones record. One of my friends did just that and provided incontrovertible evidence that the other vehicle driver was using the phone just two minutes before - insurance and police cave in, friend blameless.
-
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:42 pm
- Location: Bertram, WA
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby JBark » Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:51 pm
Hay St seems like a no go, the steep uphill means the speed differential will be really high, plus tons of traffic. Maybe up around to Parliament -> Havelock -> Ord and then over to Richardson somewhere?
I see plenty of people riding around, so there must be some decent routes through there.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:56 am
- Location: Floreat, Perth
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Hugor » Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:02 pm
Wide road, great visibility, off peak traffic, rear end collision.
Reeks of mobile phone usage to me.
This demographic of driver is my greatest fear on the roads for this very reason.
Presumptive .... yeh whatever, but I see it all the time so it fits.
- Red Rider
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:44 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Red Rider » Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:35 pm
-
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:25 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby wellington_street » Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:14 pm
Depends on your confidence in traffic - i see a dozen or more cyclists riding up Hay St in the left lane in the afternoons when im in that area. Otherwise the route you mentioned via Parliament Place.JBark wrote:So what are the good ways to ride to the west side of West Perth? Just relocated offices to near the corner of Richardson and Thomas, and I'm at a bit of a loss how best to get there from the Kwinana PSP. I'd already decided against Kings Park Rd because of what happened here, chances of being hit from behind are too high (certainly looks like that's what happened based on the damage to the car). Parking on the side, no bike lane, cars usually doing well over the speed limit, and a perfectly straight road that has you focusing on the lights at Thomas instead of right in front of the car.
Hay St seems like a no go, the steep uphill means the speed differential will be really high, plus tons of traffic. Maybe up around to Parliament -> Havelock -> Ord and then over to Richardson somewhere?
I see plenty of people riding around, so there must be some decent routes through there.
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:40 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby citywomble » Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:20 pm
Absolutely incomprehensible how anyone could hit her from behind, apart from the obvious.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:14 pm
My car was impounded along with two others when I had a serious accident involving serious injury (mine) from a life threatening accident that was always going to go to the courts. On the other hand I have been involved in a number of vehicle accidents over my many years years that did not involve any personal damage. Cops never wanted to impound any vehicles in those cases. What they do when you submit a video of some alleged incident that does not result in serious injury is neither here nor there I respectfully suggest.Aushiker wrote:ColinOldnCranky wrote:At this stage taking a look at her mobile probably is an indication of little excpet it was an accident with no obvious reason. I imagine that that is fairly normal to do so just as taking a breathalyser reading of a motorist involved in a serious incident is.
Putting one with two and maybe adding in three I would suggest that there is reasonable evidence to suggest a mobile phone may have played a role in this crash.
As to your comment on checking mobile phone usage. I can only comment based on my own experience (and of course your own experience might be different) but with every single instance I have reported to the Police I have never been asked about whether I observed a mobile phone was being used nor have I been asked if I had video evidence of same and that is despite providing video evidence of the incident of concern, i.e., I have never been asked for video showing the driver specifically so I am not so sure it is a standard procedure at all. I know with my partners crash ( a person drove through a stop sign) it never came up in any questioning of her account of the incident.
Andrew
I am pretty certain that the cops have also impounded the vehicle and will be scrutinizing it for possible mechanical issues. But I am not going to infer that she had a poorly maintained car with faulty brakes, unserviced power steering and carbon monoxide pouring into the cabin from a faulty exhaust. Just one more base to cover.
I still go with my suggestion that checking a phone would, these days, be fairly standard FOR SERIOUS ACCIDENTS/INJURY. And that nothing should be inferred from that. I was pleased to note that, while it referred to the interest in the phone, channel seven managed it in a manner that sounded very much like it was not inference of anything untoward, just one possibility to be checked.
Andrew, I'm a little surprised that you, of all here, would be willing to infer so much from so little. And it IS very little. The cops will do their job and there is no reason to get ahead of those investigations at this early stage. Which, unfortunately, too many cyclists are prone to do every bit as badly as many drivers do against cyclists.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:32 pm
Yep, inconcievable and it happens seemingly daily.citywomble wrote:I hope she survives and recovers fully. It's almost incomprehensible that someone can drive into the back of a cyclist on this road, especially at 10.00 am with the sun coming from the side irrespective of direction.
I always recommend that my friends get the mobile number of anyone "so that I can call you later );" that they have an accident with - and then ring it immediately. That sets a time record which places the time of accident, and any prior use on the phones record. One of my friends did just that and provided incontrovertible evidence that the other vehicle driver was using the phone just two minutes before - insurance and police cave in, friend blameless.
That is a truly inspired suggestion to establish the time. I hope I remember it if the occasion arises. Brilliant!
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22395
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Aushiker » Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:02 am
AndrewSen-Const. Allan Mawdesley said police had interviewed several witnesses.
“My understanding is the cyclist was staying in a straight line and was as far to the left as possible when the silver Rav4 struck her,” he said....
Sen-Const. Mawdesley said the driver’s mobile phone would be seized so police could check whether she was distracted at the time of the collision.
Speed is not believed to have been a factor in the crash.
Aushiker.com
- rolandp
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:47 am
- Location: Hillarys - Perth, WA
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby rolandp » Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:27 am
Today’s incident has sparked new calls from WA’s peak cycling body for the immediate introduction of safe-passing laws.
The legislation to make motorists leave a safe distance when over-taking bike riders is currently before State Parliament.
WestCycle chief executive Clint Shaw said the new laws would require motorists to give cyclists a one metre berth on roads with a 60km/h speed limit and 1.5m on faster roads.
“We've been concerned for quite some time now that the trend of cycling fatalities is increasing and we need to do more,” he said.
“(Safe passing laws) have already been trialled in Queensland and the ACT. It’s something we really need over here.”
Mr Shaw said he was “gutted” when told about today’s crash.
“From within the cycling community we definitely feel it,” he said.
“It's a fear that goes through lots of people and stories like this are what we dread everyday.”
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Sinner » Thu Nov 06, 2014 11:45 am
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22395
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Aushiker » Thu Nov 06, 2014 12:28 pm
It does, but at least at last WestCycle is speaking out on these issues. I suspect that it is because CycleSnail of Bicycle Transport Alliance is now actively engaged with WestCycle on the transportation side and so hopefully will work with them to get more engaged on such issues. That said one would never want a crash like this to happen before the speaking out takes place.Sinner wrote:I wonder whether the proposed safe passing law would have had any effect at all here. This seems more of a case of SMIDSY ....
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- CycleSnail
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:23 pm
- Location: Bassendean, WA
- Contact:
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby CycleSnail » Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:24 pm
A legalised safe passing distance is not a silver bullet that will fix all motorist/bike rider problems and incidents. But clear legal protection for people who ride bicycles will shift the discussion and awareness of road users. Instead of the current "you should leave some space, at your discretion, when you overtake a bike rider" it would be "If you don't leave at least one meter EVERY TIME whilst overtaking a person riding a bicycle we will catch you and fine you".Sinner wrote:I wonder whether the proposed safe passing law would have had any effect at all here. This seems more of a case of SMIDSY whether it was phone or any other distraction.
No road user is more exposed to serious injury as a result of driver distraction than people riding bicycles. And we need to continue to work towards, and support, laws that help. Safe passing distance or strict liability laws and use of footpaths for all riders will all contribute to a safer road environment.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:22 pm
(My emphasis of Hugors post)Hugor wrote:Gruesome reporting!
Wide road, great visibility, off peak traffic, rear end collision.
Reeks of mobile phone usage to me.
This demographic of driver is my greatest fear on the roads for this very reason.
Presumptive .... yeh whatever, but I see it all the time so it fits.
Yeah. And drivers claim to see cyclists going through red lights, moving across without warning, jumping from paths to roads etc. Therefore feel free to make the presumptive case that a cyclist did just that every time a motorist runs into the back of a cyclist. After all, that is what all the hateful comments at the end of news articles describing bike fatalities bring forth.
I find those sort sorts of rush to judgement offensive just as I do when you do the same.
Meanwhile I'll just wait and see what the police turn up. I am probably wasting my time but I'd urge you and many others to do the same. Leave the low-info presumptions to the haters in the smoke boxes.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:27 pm
I agree with you Heinrich that a legalised safe passign distance does not fix everything. Though if the car before such a driver slows because ofa legal imperative, then pulls out when there is sufficient room to get by, the chance of that maneuvre being missed by the trailing driver is probably a lot less than otherwise. Or the trailing driver simply runs into the back of the slowing lead car, a better outcome than running into the back of a cyclist.CycleSnail wrote:These crashes are tragic, and seeing this person is very close to my own age makes me cringe - recovery for her will be hard..., but I hope nevertheless for a good outcome for her.
A legalised safe passing distance is not a silver bullet that will fix all motorist/bike rider problems and incidents. But clear legal protection for people who ride bicycles will shift the discussion and awareness of road users. Instead of the current "you should leave some space, at your discretion, when you overtake a bike rider" it would be "If you don't leave at least one meter EVERY TIME whilst overtaking a person riding a bicycle we will catch you and fine you".Sinner wrote:I wonder whether the proposed safe passing law would have had any effect at all here. This seems more of a case of SMIDSY whether it was phone or any other distraction.
No road user is more exposed to serious injury as a result of driver distraction than people riding bicycles. And we need to continue to work towards, and support, laws that help. Safe passing distance or strict liability laws and use of footpaths for all riders will all contribute to a safer road environment.
Good luck with the ongoing battle Heinrich.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:56 am
- Location: Floreat, Perth
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby Hugor » Thu Nov 06, 2014 11:13 pm
Hey I'm not alone in my presumptive approach to this.ColinOldnCranky wrote: (My emphasis of Hugors post)
Yeah. And drivers claim to see cyclists going through red lights, moving across without warning, jumping from paths to roads etc. Therefore feel free to make the presumptive case that a cyclist did just that every time a motorist runs into the back of a cyclist. After all, that is what all the hateful comments at the end of news articles describing bike fatalities bring forth.
I find those sort sorts of rush to judgement offensive just as I do when you do the same.
Meanwhile I'll just wait and see what the police turn up. I am probably wasting my time but I'd urge you and many others to do the same. Leave the low-info presumptions to the haters in the smoke boxes.
The Dutch and Danes have presumptive liability legislation with collisions involving cars and cyclists or any other "vulnerable road user" for a long time.
There is a massive movement for the Brits to follow suit and it will probably occur in the next few years.
This doesn't mean that the cyclist is never at fault but it assumes that in the absence of evidence to the contrary they are.
Rear ended road collisions are approached in the same manner and this case should be no different,
I don't care if you find my comments offensive. I find unicycles pointless and stupid too. We're all entitled to our opinion.
-
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:16 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby fixed » Fri Nov 07, 2014 12:25 am
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:26 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby NewStew » Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:04 pm
In the meantime I really hope that the person hit makes a full physical and mental recovery and can enjoy getting on a bike again one day soon....
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:14 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby twowheels » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:45 pm
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclist Hit Kings Park this morning
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:24 am
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.