Postby citywomble » Tue Dec 09, 2014 1:40 am
Hi Roland,
An interesting set of facts, in part misinformation.
In my opinion, on the surface, there is no doubt that the network of shared paths provides a good cycling environment and provides access to some great places in a great climate. For the casual cyclist, who drives there with a bike rack, or happens to live close to good facilities it is good.
But, only just over 1% cycle for transport so a top ten position cannot be justified. One reason it works at present, ironically, is that Perth is a very car centric city. Lack of footpaths, low density and large distances between destinations means that few people walk. So, the relative few that do cycle do not place a great strain on shared paths.
The harsh facts:
Dedicated bike lanes are very few and far between. Most are at best advisory with no enforcement and the only thing that prevents them from being obstructed by parked cars is a reluctance to park on most 'busy' roads where the pseudo lanes are.
Dedicated Bike paths again don't exist much and are instead shared paths where the pedestrian had right of way.
Fortunately it currently works reasonably well but only because both pedestrian and cycling numbers are low by world standards. At current levels it works reasonably well and, on the surface the facilities, where they are present, appear to be good and provide a great riding experience. Where this will fall down is if cycling numbers increase much as, without better alternatives and substantial investment, the current facilities will not be able to cope.
Imagine a 5% cycling modeshare coupled with additional pedestrian demand on the bike paths in the No 8 city.