If anyone has a pic of the sign
After being bombarded by cyclist-haters — many of them patrons — the hotel did a backflip and erected a sign announcing a new “no-Lycra policy”.
Postby flashpixx » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:36 pm
After being bombarded by cyclist-haters — many of them patrons — the hotel did a backflip and erected a sign announcing a new “no-Lycra policy”.
Postby Parker » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:40 pm
Postby biker jk » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:43 pm
Postby CKinnard » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:14 pm
Postby Bakks » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:16 pm
Postby gabrielle260 » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:22 pm
It's fine enforcing a dress code as long as they also include non cycling women wearing gym gear made with Lycra as well as women wearing leggings, men showing plumbers crack, men showing hairy armpits under those baggy singlet things and all the other generally unpleasant sights one sees in cafes.Bakks wrote:I don't see the big issue with them enforcing a dress code.
Cyclists whinging about it certainly doesn't help the "self entitlted and arrogant" image.
Postby Jackfrost » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:36 pm
Amen, I bet I wouldn't be allowed to park up the boat and pop in for a coffee in my wet fishing clothes and booties, smelling of crab bait. Don't see how this is different to men dressed in lycra, soaked in sweat and smelling of body odour.Bakks wrote:I don't see the big issue with them enforcing a dress code.
Cyclists whinging about it certainly doesn't help the "self entitlted and arrogant" image.
Postby nachoman » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:40 pm
From Seven News Facebookflashpixx wrote:If anyone has a pic of the sign
Postby CKinnard » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:49 pm
Postby Bah77 » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:53 pm
Theres a slight difference in that you can't tell if a woman has been sweating it up for a few hours if she is in gym gear, whereas theres a decent chance the cyclist has.gabrielle260 wrote: include non cycling women wearing gym gear made with Lycra as well as women wearing leggings, men showing plumbers crack, men showing hairy armpits under those baggy singlet things and all the other generally unpleasant sights one sees in cafes.
Postby biker jk » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:56 pm
Postby blkmcs » Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:07 pm
It is their business they can decide on the dress code they want to enforce.gabrielle260 wrote:It's fine enforcing a dress code as long as they also include non cycling women wearing gym gear made with Lycra as well as women wearing leggings, men showing plumbers crack, men showing hairy armpits under those baggy singlet things and all the other generally unpleasant sights one sees in cafes.Bakks wrote:I don't see the big issue with them enforcing a dress code.
Cyclists whinging about it certainly doesn't help the "self entitlted and arrogant" image.
Postby CKinnard » Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:18 pm
absolutely.....and cyclists can decide whether they boycott Multiplex.blkmcs wrote:It is their business they can decide on the dress code they want to enforce.
Postby Jackfrost » Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:30 pm
You appear to be a tad agro, calm down and go for a ride or grab a coffee but don't try doing them in that specific orderCKinnard wrote:absolutely.....and cyclists can decide whether they boycott Multiplex.blkmcs wrote:It is their business they can decide on the dress code they want to enforce.
IME, cyclists are done riding by 10am. So I presume Perth bogans are complaining about sweaty cyclists before o at breakfast.....hahahha....delirious.
Postby Red Rider » Mon Jan 12, 2015 11:20 pm
Postby CKinnard » Mon Jan 12, 2015 11:49 pm
95% of cyclists I see before 10am are not in a lather of sweat, especially the fat ones, because they don't push themselves as hard.Jackfrost wrote:You appear to be a tad agro, calm down and go for a ride or grab a coffee but don't try doing them in that specific order
Postby hooman » Tue Jan 13, 2015 1:29 am
Postby exadios » Tue Jan 13, 2015 1:44 am
Postby Shred11 » Tue Jan 13, 2015 4:46 am
As soon as I read "No singlet's", I could picture the sort of person running the cafe. Faied high school english.biker jk wrote:The plural of singlet is singlets not singlet's. Bogans running cafes.
Postby Hugor » Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:32 am
Postby CXCommuter » Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:53 am
Postby flashpixx » Tue Jan 13, 2015 12:17 pm
agreed. Whether it is swanky or a try-hard establishment they can and have enforced what ever dress code they like.Red Rider wrote:Fair enough, it's a reasonably swanky place, a minimum dress standard is understandable.
Plenty of other places for the lycra's to go nearby such as Coffea and Cioccolato on Ardross St, or Deep Water Point Cafe.
Postby CKinnard » Tue Jan 13, 2015 12:36 pm
It's not about their right to have a dress code, or whether I've been there. It's about management hypocrisy (read their facebook page), no doubt driven by them intimidated by bogan stereotyping mentality. No doubt management would have preferred a higher degree of tolerance between its patrons, so it could take everyone's money.flashpixx wrote:Curious how many detractors above have actually been to Raffles
Postby cage » Tue Jan 13, 2015 1:03 pm
Postby alh9a5 » Tue Jan 13, 2015 1:21 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.