Cyclists passing cyclists
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:51 am
Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby dasinc » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:01 pm
I got abused by a cyclist other other day as I swerved (still within the left psp lane) to go around some debris. This guy got right in my face about it. We had quite the robust discussion about each others various short comings. Anyway, I was just curious as to what others think.. He abused me for swerving (within my lane 30cm at most I'd guess.) and I abused him for passing too close, and without warning.
Quite often I get passed by cyclists (I am slow) in my own lane. I think that is too close....if there is space, why not use it? We want cars to give us a meter, why can't we give each other a bit of space as well?
Thoughts?
- HappyHumber
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:48 pm
- Location: Perth, (S.o.R.) W.A.
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby HappyHumber » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:18 pm
Sad that I'm experiencing and hearing a tad more inter cyclist agro of late. Just like road rage; everyone gets on the defensive first as adrenaline shoots up and tempers flare.
The lines of 'us and them' are blurring.
Hit me up via the BNA dm; I'll get an alert. If y'know, you know.
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby NASHIE » Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:01 pm
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:49 am
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Scott_C » Tue Apr 17, 2018 7:10 pm
Equally, if you are going to significantly change your line you should also be giving prior warning that it is going to happen if at all possible (audible or hand signal).
Finally, we all stuff some things up sometimes and should remember to not get too high and mighty about it (mainly aimed at the guy overtaking and riders in general).
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:56 am
- Location: Floreat, Perth
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Hugor » Tue Apr 17, 2018 9:40 pm
Such is the danger of riding cycle paths.
When overtaking you really should be making sure the coast is clear and this includes anticipating any obstacles in front of the rider your passing.
The responsibility lies with the guy overtaking in my opinion.
- 10speedsemiracer
- Posts: 4904
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:38 pm
- Location: Back on the Tools .. when I'm not in the office
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby 10speedsemiracer » Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:15 am
There needs to be an audible from the passing rider, "on your right" is my preference and is normally enough, and better than a bell which causes a slow (possibly new) rider to head-check or lose directional integrity...Scott_C wrote:..... and give an audible indication that they are going to pass ("on yer right" or ring their bell).....
- Mububban
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:19 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Mububban » Wed Apr 18, 2018 11:09 am
When I overtake other cyclists on PSP, I'll swing right over as far as I can go into the other lane to avoid just such an occasion. We all know how many unexpected obstacles the PSP can produce.
- Red Rider
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:44 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Red Rider » Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:29 pm
Too often I see someone overtake another rider within a bees whisker when I'm coming the other way. I've even had two riders abreast overtaking someone whilst I'm coming the other way. I only just had bike width to get past at 30 clicks. Kamikazes
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:53 am
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby novice_101 » Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:14 pm
I like to keep in mind that I may be faster than this person, but there's someone who will be faster than me too, so the "treat others as you'd like to be treated" rule comes in. As was said earlier, sometimes people react badly in the heat of the moment, which is unfortunate.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:24 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Knox_Harrington » Thu Apr 19, 2018 12:34 pm
Hopefully pedestrians and cyclists will be seperated in some future iteration of the PSP. It seems that wherever a power and speed variation exists between modes of transport, conflict will inevitably arise due to an unpreventable subset of impatient jerks.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:17 pm
Agreed. Any user of roads and paths should not assume that the person in front will never ever have a need, unplanned, to deviate at least a small amount.NASHIE wrote:Sorry to hear agro on the PSPs, but your right and the passing rider needs to pull his head in. Riding with a group etc you need to hold your line or you could cause a crash, but passing other riders, peds, cars etc etc you need to give them room as they are an unknown.
Hell, you'd think that riders would we a little wary of a waddling wobbling unicycle but even I have riders passing by me with zero margin.
If a rider does not have the space to get past even when there is another rider coming towards them then they need to accept full responsibility for any resulting collision. It is NOT the fault of the rider in front who is, after all, only seeing half the picture and cannot always have the luxury of being able to do a head check.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:44 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby XIX » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:52 pm
Ive come past you as well a few time Colin and never found you to be too far over so probably just a bad situation for all which no doubt will still happen even if all have the best of intentions.
- chuckchunder
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby chuckchunder » Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:37 pm
I disagree. Maybe for experienced riders who are familiar with road rider etiquette and bunch riding in close quarters, but many, I would guess most, using the PSP's in Perth are not. Many riders find being passed within the lane intimidating and unnerving, even with a warning. Same goes for pedestrians.XIX wrote:"Bike back" is the common term when used to over take someone or in a group to signal someone is coming past. The psp is sufficiently wide enough for 2 each way within the "lane" so as long as you stay left so others can pass safely and they call out when coming past then issues should be at a minimum.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:44 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby XIX » Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:35 am
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:46 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby vinski » Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:16 pm
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Thoglette » Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:27 pm
Same reason they buzz you when driving their car. MGIF. NOW!vinski wrote: I dont understand why someone would pass closely by unless a bike or ped was in the oncoming lane. Even then, it would probably be better to slow down for 5 secs and then pass. Just my 2c
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby NASHIE » Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:55 pm
I've had riders (wheel suckers) lockup and nearly rear end me as i slow for peds with oncoming traffic. You get some madly ringing there bell which i'm sure the expection is for the ped to get of the path. As mentioned above we all get it wrong from time to time. Varying speeds sometimes make closing meet points hard to judge. A sorry or hand wave is all takes to keep the peace, which seems hard for some.Thoglette wrote:Same reason they buzz you when driving their car. MGIF. NOW!vinski wrote: I dont understand why someone would pass closely by unless a bike or ped was in the oncoming lane. Even then, it would probably be better to slow down for 5 secs and then pass. Just my 2c
- Tequestra
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:12 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Tequestra » Fri Apr 20, 2018 1:33 pm
Thank you Mr Hugor. This is what I was thinking too, although it is seemingly beyond the usual rider/driver awareness required to obtain a drivers' license, and also that of some inexperienced cyclists, as exemplified in this thread.Hugor wrote: When overtaking you really should be making sure the coast is clear and this includes anticipating any obstacles in front of the rider your passing.
The responsibility lies with the guy overtaking in my opinion.
I do not see it as 100% responsibility for one party or the other, but the most responsibility technically rests with the overtaking vehicle. The exception being those who ride carelessly veering across the road or path with no good reason. Potholes are good reason, and the one behind should be aware of the obvious need to veer right to avoid such obstacles, even if a 4x4 could easily drive straight over said potholes.
In my opinion, there is a much greater requirement for an overtaking rider to give audible warning to the rider in front, and if it is a narrow PSP then best to slow down and tailgate for a little until there is good clear road and the front rider is clearly following a straight line on the left.
It is not a race. There is no hurry to pass other riders. If someone is in a hurry, then they should have taken their helicopter instead of their bike.
PS: Just a thought. On the roads, cyclists usually hear cars and trucks approaching from behind because of the sound of their engines and exhaust notes. When most cars on the road are electric however, that audible warning to the cyclist that a car is about to pass will be practically silenced. There is going to have to be some change in the conduct of city cyclists or else there might need to be little piezo buzzers or some kind of minimally-pollutant noise for big electric cars. It is also food for thought for electric cyclists with stronger legs than mine. Nobody likes surprises.
- Caelum
- Posts: 864
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:25 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby Caelum » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:13 pm
If i'm overtaking someone and they're *visibly* much slower than myself, i'll normally not give them any warning, but will give them a very wide berth. I'll go right into the right hand lane, usually in the middle or far side of it. Reasoning being that if they don't know i'm there, they'll just trundle along and not change their behaviour. They're likely to be an inexperienced rider, and any form of communication to them is likely to illicit a change in that behaviour.
If they're only slightly slower than myself, then i'll usually say 'on your right' *before* moving past them or even preparing to, just so that if they do react in some way, i can see that reaction before it's too late for me to evade any change in their behaviour.
Regardless of the situation, i'll NEVER overtake unless the right hand lane (assuming it exists) is clear, and it's safe to do so. ie, no intersections, no merging of paths, etc.
Just like in a car, you don't overtake someone and stay in the lane, even if it's 'big enough' to fit two bikes abreast. It's just not necessary. Take an extra 5 seconds, wait until it's safe, and THEN overtake.
It's your life you're putting in danger, afterall.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:02 pm
Ageed.chuckchunder wrote:I disagree. Maybe for experienced riders who are familiar with road rider etiquette and bunch riding in close quarters, but many, I would guess most, using the PSP's in Perth are not. Many riders find being passed within the lane intimidating and unnerving, even with a warning. Same goes for pedestrians.XIX wrote:"Bike back" is the common term when used to over take someone or in a group to signal someone is coming past. The psp is sufficiently wide enough for 2 each way within the "lane" so as long as you stay left so others can pass safely and they call out when coming past then issues should be at a minimum.
But to XIX, even if one does know (I know what they mean), a shout of "bike back" or "On your right" or "move over moron" does not elicit anything like the clear understanding from me as does an early ring of the bell.
Oops, forgot, it is against the etiquette of Cool for a cyclist to retain a bell on his bars.
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby NASHIE » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:38 pm
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 5:06 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby commute » Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:40 pm
One afternoon this summer I encountered the cycling equivalent of the freeway driver who tail gates and changes lanes every few seconds only to find them selves in a worse position than if they had stayed in one lane.NASHIE wrote:
I've had riders (wheel suckers) lockup and nearly rear end me as i slow for peds with oncoming traffic.
My commuter bike was out of service so I was on my old DH bike. This guy was right up my rear trying to pass me on the causeway bridge, but there was a stream of pedestrians and bikes in both directions making it too hard. I got round a couple of pedestrians on the first bridge when there was just enough gap for one and he got stuck, I could hear him cursing away behind me.
He caught up again quickly to my slow but consistent pace of course and was back at it on my rear.
At the start of the island I was following another cyclist who overtook some walkers but I could see the gap wasn't big enough for me to safely get through due to oncoming traffic, so I launched in to the grass on the left as I didn't want to lose momentum. I heard loud swearing and skidding as Mr tailgater locked up his brakes. He had been so close on my tail he couldn't see the pedestrians.
Tailgater finally got around me half way over the second bridge muttering that I was an idiot for overtaking on the left. (Never mind that I was much further away from the pedestrians on the grass than the other side of the path is)
After riding down the stairs at the end of the causeway, he ended up stuck behind me again briefly as we passed under the causeway bridge for one final rage. There was a 1/3 chance that he was heading in that direction, unlucky!
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby NASHIE » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:15 pm
Don't mind giving hand signals to following rider if they say hello or let you know they want to sit on or take a turn etc, but agree those riders that sit on unannounced can just sit back and look out for themselves.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:52 am
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby pedalmonkey » Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:50 pm
The uncool factor really isn't the reason. If you ring a bell, most people (whether bikes or pedestrians), slowly turn their heads, gape at you and wander into the middle of the path while doing so. Occasionally they even try to get out of the way by moving into the opposite lane, which is really the worst possible thing.ColinOldnCranky wrote:chuckchunder wrote:Oops, forgot, it is against the etiquette of Cool for a cyclist to retain a bell on his bars.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:44 pm
Re: Cyclists passing cyclists
Postby XIX » Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:14 pm
Yup, not to mention at 40km/h plus the last thing I want to be doing is fumbling around to ring my bell. If I dont get a response from the party in front from my shouting I generally slow down and assume they may be unaware of my presence and so expect random motions.pedalmonkey wrote:The uncool factor really isn't the reason. If you ring a bell, most people (whether bikes or pedestrians), slowly turn their heads, gape at you and wander into the middle of the path while doing so. Occasionally they even try to get out of the way by moving into the opposite lane, which is really the worst possible thing.ColinOldnCranky wrote:chuckchunder wrote:Oops, forgot, it is against the etiquette of Cool for a cyclist to retain a bell on his bars.
I have a bell on my bike and its almost invisible to most so I dont care about that, but I dont find I get a suitable response from that in most instances.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.