Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:11 pm
Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby looseleftie » Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:02 am
I have been working at improving my hill climbing, and have looked at any small gains/improvements I can make to my riding.. Of late, I have begun looking at my pedaling stroke.. I have only been cycling close to 2 yrs, loving it, and improving, yet have come across the "correct pedaling stroke" on You Tube.. Mmmmm, I had never thought about it...
My question really is that does dragging that foot back and lifting make a "actual" performance benefit to ones cycling?
Has this ever been scientifically proven of any significant, or minor benefits?
I just try and flog myself out there, without thinking of pedaling technique..
Also when might you consider using the slide your foot like u were scraping off mud technique? Flats, small hills, or both? Is it when u are spinning high cadence?
Love any advice.
Cheers
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21325
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby g-boaf » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:35 am
I thought I saw someone post on here a while back something similar to that. I cannot give you any further advice.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:47 am
The other issue is that what people think they are doing when pedalling is rarely what they are actually doing. In order to really know, it requires independent pedal force measurement, something that's beginning to emerge in newer power meter offerings (although not to the standard of purpose built laboratory systems) but which come with little real evidence based support on how to actually interpret such information, let alone consider it actionable intelligence.
First of all, in order of priority:
1. Get a decent bike fit (all facets).
2. Then train well in a manner to improve fitness and power output.
3. Then perhaps even race (in the sense that it will naturally force you to adopt/learn effective ways to use the power you have and use gears appropriately).
These are way more important than faffing about with pedalling technique.
There are very few people in the world that properly study this stuff, and the ones that know what they are doing (and aren't selling something) typically find that tinkering with a rider's natural method makes little difference to performance, and often degrades it.
Jim Martin (an acknowledge world expert in the field) did a nice summary of pedalling technique myths a few years back:
http://wattagetraining.com/files/JMarti ... hnique.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That's not to say that more research ahead won't uncover some interesting uses of pedal force data and ways to eek out half a percent here or there but the effect sizes are going to be pretty small (else they'd have stuck out as obvious by now) and individual, which is the case for many types of training interventions that are peripheral to the mode of exercise.
With that said I'm sure the anecdotes will start flooding in.
- Derny Driver
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:18 pm
- Location: Wollongong
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby Derny Driver » Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:17 am
Perhaps we could now discuss the merit or otherwise of
"I just try and flog myself out there"
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:11 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby looseleftie » Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:46 pm
-
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby am50em » Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:34 pm
-
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:44 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby softy » Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:44 pm
A power meter is a great pacing tool (probably the thing you are looking for) but still super expensive.
just my 2 cents input.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21325
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby g-boaf » Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:08 am
What did people do before power meters? Only one of my bikes has one, and it isn't very reliable. And as DD says after this post, what have they got to do with the way you pedal.softy wrote:From my research and application (ancedotal) is that keep a cadence of around 90 to 105 to climb, don't attack the hill flat out, use a consistent power/cadence you can maintain up the hill so you can start to click up and accelerate over the crest.
A power meter is a great pacing tool (probably the thing you are looking for) but still super expensive.
just my 2 cents input.
- kb
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:22 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby kb » Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:53 am
They rode without them?g-boaf wrote:What did people do before power meters? Only one of my bikes has one, and it isn't very reliable.softy wrote:From my research and application (ancedotal) is that keep a cadence of around 90 to 105 to climb, don't attack the hill flat out, use a consistent power/cadence you can maintain up the hill so you can start to click up and accelerate over the crest.
A power meter is a great pacing tool (probably the thing you are looking for) but still super expensive.
just my 2 cents input.
I'm sure it depends on the person. Some are natural good at listening to their body and judging pacing, some are educable, others (I suspect I fall more into this group ) are just lacking there.
- Derny Driver
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:18 pm
- Location: Wollongong
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby Derny Driver » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:09 am
wow
- kb
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:22 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby kb » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:21 am
Pacing. As in text above. Thread drift is not uncommon on these forums...Derny Driver wrote:Power meters correct poor pedalling stroke now?
wow
That said, according to marketing they do. (Spin scan?)
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21325
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby g-boaf » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:28 am
As for spin scan, it's just another number among many. Apparently mine is sometimes around 70 average. Without having the number on a screen in front of you, how would you know the difference between 50 and 70? I don't think it makes much of a difference.
- kb
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:22 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby kb » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:42 am
I can add that I personally don't find torque effectiveness or pedal smoothness particularly actionable either. Standing vs seated is occasionally interesting just to compare the numbers against perception but again, I wouldn't go as far as to say necessarily useful.
- Derny Driver
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:18 pm
- Location: Wollongong
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby Derny Driver » Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:12 am
Yep, every thread drifts into a discussion on powermeters ...kb wrote:Thread drift is not uncommon on these forums...
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22160
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby mikesbytes » Wed Mar 09, 2016 1:06 pm
What they are probably referring to using the Flexors and not just the Extendors. There's not a simple answer to this, most of the time its not of concern but not always.looseleftie wrote:My question really is that does dragging that foot back and lifting make a "actual" performance benefit to ones cycling?
Has this ever been scientifically proven of any significant, or minor benefits?
They say Extendors are more efficient at delivering power over the Flexors and if that is the case then delivering the bulk of the power thru the Extendors makes sense and they are stronger muscles anyway. If you are in a situation where you need to maximum power thru the pedals, then it makes sense that more muscle can provide more power for a short period of time that is.
There is also the case of stabilisation. Typically we are told to lock on our core to stabilise our pelvis but the flexors of one leg will also contribute as their action is the opposite of the other leg.
Let me know if this is where you were thinking and we can discuss further
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:32 pm
Hence refer my first post.kb wrote:Pacing. As in text above. Thread drift is not uncommon on these forums...Derny Driver wrote:Power meters correct poor pedalling stroke now?
wow
That said, according to marketing they do. (Spin scan?)
Spin scan and other intra crank revolution power measurement variants like the charts from a Wattbike are not going to be able to provide the data for such analysis because they are limited to reporting net data downstream of the bottom bracket. IOW they can only ever report data that is the combined forces or torque or power from both cranks (legs) combined. e.g. when they report 100 units of force/torque/power at any instant of a pedal stroke, that's a net value from both cranks (legs). What they can never tell you is whether that's because one leg is generating 100 units while the other is zero, or whether one is generating 80 while the other contributes 20, or whether one is generating 120 while the other is contributing -20. Alone that should give you some idea of how misleading such information can be.
Some newer meters are available that have the potential to provide such independent crank or pedal data, however such information is not available via your regular ANT+ bike computer or .fit files. The temporal resolution is not up to it. It's a solution that requires proprietary hard/soft/firmware.
And even if it were available, what then?
Another example at the simplest level is many power meters provide "power balance" data, which purports to tell you the proportion of power generated by each leg. However the very measurement itself depends on how it is measured. It's quite possible for two power meters (e.g. say a Quarq and a pair of Garmin Vectors) to be perfectly accurate in reporting power, but for one to report right leg dominance while the other says you are left leg dominant. What gives? It's only until you begin to pull apart the data and understand how these numbers are generated that you begin to realise their limitations. And that's before recognising that asymmetry is normal and not something typically requiring "correction".
Essentially, to "correct" a pedal stroke, you have to know what exactly needs correction and why, and what one should be correcting it to and how. Anyone who thinks they can answer those questions and has not actually measured these things with laboratory grade instrumented pedals is kidding themselves.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:11 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby looseleftie » Wed Mar 09, 2016 4:34 pm
This is why I was asking about pedal technique, and whether it makes a quantitative difference at all? Looking for any assistance, whilst my fitness/strength improve as I continue with cycling.
re power meter, sounds like a useful training tool, just too expensive at least at the moment..
-
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby am50em » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:43 pm
given I weigh 100Kg my climbing is not the fastest but the area I live in means hill climbing wherever I go and I would like to be faster as well
some good points raised in this thread:
- * bike fit
* core strength
* pacing (could use power meter or heart rate monitor - though with heart rate it can vary depending on how you are on the day)
* going hard (it just hurts to climb fast)
I often work on getting my pedalling action smooth and try to unweight the rising leg.
I find for me, my power level is up for same level of exertion (perceived and heart rate).
Not scientific proof but I think it helps me so I continue to try and make my default action. At present it needs conscious thought to get the action.
Which is why I suggest trying it - it may help you or it may not. Will take some time to adapt to any new technique.
Cheers.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Mar 10, 2016 9:06 am
It's a snapshot from a spinscan and shows each side's power output segmented into 15 degree increments from the top of pedal stroke to the bottom.
It suggests a rather bizarre pedal stroke (an unlikely evenness on the left) and left side dominance, which is pretty funny for a left trans-tibial amputee. This is in no way a reflection of how I was actually pedalling and is nothing more than a bit of light comic relief. You certainly would not want to be making training interventions on the basis of such data.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22160
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby mikesbytes » Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:28 pm
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Mar 10, 2016 8:29 pm
It could be perfectly accurate, but also completely misleading. It's a matter of recognising the limitations of such information due to the nature of how it is generated. Unfortunately it is marketed as having value far beyond its true worth (which isn't much).mikesbytes wrote:Accuracy of the equipment
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22160
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby mikesbytes » Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:05 pm
That's the reality, people luv info regardless of whether its actually useful or not, so I don't blame that company for generating that pretty graph.
-
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:44 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby softy » Fri Mar 11, 2016 12:07 am
The only thing that will tell you, if you are putting out more power is a powe meter. Is this not the goal?
Is you are serious about monitoring power, unfortunately a power meter is a must, otherwise how do you know if changing your pedal technique is actually doing anything.
- kb
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:22 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby kb » Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:22 am
I'm going to say "sometimes"softy wrote: The only thing that will tell you, if you are putting out more power is a powe meter. Is this not the goal?
Perhaps the goal is to reduce tension or too much work in less suitable (more easily fatigued) muscle groups.
-
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:36 pm
Re: Pedaling technique?!? Is it scientifically proven?
Postby eeksll » Sun May 15, 2016 9:54 am
nothing serendipitous about it, facebook/google/... are literally that "good" at itAlex Simmons/RST wrote:Somewhat serendipitously, this old image popped up in my facebook feed today: ...
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.