CKinnard wrote:And even bought a new pair of jeans today! size 87cm!
I've probably told the story somewhere on this forum already about my last jeans buying experience.
If I want jeans that I can pull up over my thighs, I'm looking at size 38. And even then most of them are skin-tight (despite the tag calling them "baggy" or "relaxed fit").
The problem there is that my waist is about 32". 6" is a lot of waistband to haul in with a belt
So... I figured... half the world's population are more prone to having big hips, big thighs, and small waist than the other half. I'm shopping on the wrong wall of the jeans shop.
Turns out... most womens' jeans are also gaping at the waist if they're big enough to fit my hips and thighs
Luckily, Jeans West have a "curve embracer" line, especially for voluptuous girls like me
... and it turns out, the size 12 is not a bad fit at all
The downsides are that womens' jeans have a dysfunctional short zip, which is not quite long enough for... ahem... the purpose for which men require jeans to have a zip... , and also that they have stupid little pretend pockets that aren't deep enough to actually store anything in. I'm man enough to wear girly pants, but I'm not going to start carrying a handbag for my keys and phone
Anyway, the last few months my girly size 12 jeans are a bit more booty-hugging than they were when I bought them. Hence my participation on this thread.
Check-in: I have dropped pretty quickly from 86kg to 84kg in the first week or so (sustained over a few days in both cases). Probably a bit of residual bleugh leaving my system.
I've started logging food and exercise on MyFitnessPal, calibrated for a 0.5kg/week loss (which gives me about 7000 kJ/day quota). As somebody who has never counted calories before, it's a very useful tool... even just to quantify and take notice of which foods are absolute energy bomb disasters, and how inconsequential other foods are. Immediate action is to load my dinner plate sky-high with non-starchy vegetables, to make up for smaller helpings of yummy meaty saucy things. Shovel the peas and carrots down the hatch first (ho hum), then enjoy the good stuff once I'm almost filled up.
Big shock was one day I was out on the road at lunch, and defaulted to a not-pretending-to-be-healthy-but-not-excessive lunch of a pie and a sausage roll. OMGosh calorie bomb! Way to demolish most of a day's energy quota in one not-very-satisfying hit!
Another surprise has been just how much energy gets absorbed by cycling. Again, noting that I've never counted calories or done any kind of energy balance calculation. I've just believed the conventional wisdom that you exercise for performance and eat for weight. Sure, that's good advice, but it's hard not to see the massive difference in your balance sheet if you drop a 6500 kJ 2-hour early morning bunch ride on top of your default 7000kJ energy budget for a Saturday
.
Now I'm getting the hang of what an energy-balanced day looks like, missing a bike commute - even just my short 6km each way - is a massive blow to my budget. Hard to make up the difference by reducing food intake.
I'm obsessing over it a bit at the moment, which is obviously not going to last, but it's an education process. Helping to work out what a new normal could be, and what it can't be (sausage rolls and CBF commuting days).
tim