Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
The information / discussion in the Cycling Health Forum is not qualified medical advice. Please consult your doctor.
-
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:34 pm
Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby zill » Mon Feb 09, 2015 8:36 pm
-
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:12 am
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby Rex » Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:53 pm
Essentially, different algorithms between the two.
Unless you have a PWM & HRM the numbers really aren't accurate at all, but given that I always go with the Strava numbers which for me is always less.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:32 pm
An accurate power meter will get you the closest to knowing actual energy metabolised, with accuracy then being a matter of knowing your personal typical gross efficiency (which requires lab testing to establish).Rex wrote:Hunt through Strava Knowledge Base/Support and they give their explanation, which escapes me now.
Essentially, different algorithms between the two.
Unless you have a PWM & HRM the numbers really aren't accurate at all, but given that I always go with the Strava numbers which for me is always less.
HRMs and other means of estimating energy metabolised are usually not much more than light comic relief.
Put it this way, for such methods to be consistently right, it would mean they are as good as a power meter at measuring your power output.
-
- Posts: 3459
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:23 am
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby CKinnard » Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:57 pm
If you are not Calorie counting what you put in your mouth, there's no point estimating your energy expenditure.
-
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby zill » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:48 pm
CKinnard wrote:Depends which garmin you are using. From the 800 onwards, garmin estimates got more accurate.
If you are not Calorie counting what you put in your mouth, there's no point estimating your energy expenditure.
How is the 510?
Currently strictly calorie counting what is going in the mouth as well!
Think its going well since if I over indulge one day, the next day will start with the extra calories that accumulated the day before. It's like currency for food.
-
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby zill » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:50 pm
Alex Simmons/RST wrote: An accurate power meter will get you the closest to knowing actual energy metabolised, with accuracy then being a matter of knowing your personal typical gross efficiency (which requires lab testing to establish).
You know a good place to get this tested in Melbourne?
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Feb 12, 2015 1:29 pm
I can't vouch for the quality of the testing (such tests are quite sensitive to protocols and quality of equipment calibration) but presumably the VIS would provide a start.zill wrote:Alex Simmons/RST wrote: An accurate power meter will get you the closest to knowing actual energy metabolised, with accuracy then being a matter of knowing your personal typical gross efficiency (which requires lab testing to establish).
You know a good place to get this tested in Melbourne?
Not sure why you'd bother though.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:22 pm
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby Illuminate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:11 pm
I use a mobile phone (sony xperia z3) to record my rides.
I suspect that the GPS is less accurate (not as pin point) as the Garmin GPS. Given that much of the terrain was very steep, the end result of the lack of precision a profile that zig zags upwards/downwards considerably (with a gradual climb up to Falls Creek, even through the gradient was actually quite smooth upwards with relatively few small downs/ups.
Given that Strava uses the recorded profile to calculate total calories consumed, I wouldn't be surprised if this throws the total calories consumed value WAY out.
Just my 2c worth.
Cheers,
-
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:26 pm
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby BenGr » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:02 pm
https://www.strava.com/activities/155327242" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; That was using a phone. It has overestimated the climb by about 50%, and the gradient fluctuates far too much. Other rides I did overestimated the climbing by a similar amount.
Interestingly enough on recent rides with a mate his gain using a phone has been comparable to my barometric cycle computer, so Strava might be using a phones barometric sensor now.
- kb
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:22 pm
Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby kb » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:19 pm
That'll be Strava's height data + smoothing method. If your device isn't recognised as a device with a barometer, they calculate the elevation themselves. I guess GPS accuracy comes into it to the extent that they probably don't snap to road, so you'll get interesting artefacts near drop-offsIlluminate wrote: I use a mobile phone (sony xperia z3) to record my rides.
I suspect that the GPS is less accurate (not as pin point) as the Garmin GPS. Given that much of the terrain was very steep, the end result of the lack of precision a profile that zig zags upwards/downwards considerably
Huh, cool. I hadn't realised they used their power estimates for that.Illuminate wrote: Given that Strava uses the recorded profile to calculate total calories consumed, I wouldn't be surprised if this throws the total calories consumed value WAY out.
[edit: beaten to the punch ]
-
- Posts: 3459
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:23 am
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby CKinnard » Thu Apr 02, 2015 4:59 pm
zill wrote:CKinnard wrote:Depends which garmin you are using. From the 800 onwards, garmin estimates got more accurate.
If you are not Calorie counting what you put in your mouth, there's no point estimating your energy expenditure.
How is the 510?
Currently strictly calorie counting what is going in the mouth as well!
Think its going well since if I over indulge one day, the next day will start with the extra calories that accumulated the day before. It's like currency for food.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:43 am
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby durianrider » Sat Apr 18, 2015 12:14 pm
HR varies too much and the other methods garmin and strava use are vague at best.
A PM is the best part one can buy for their bike, assuming they already have a saddle.
I have them on all my most used bikes. I can afford any product on the market but found the Stages the lightest, stiffest and easiest to slap on my friends bikes in a few minutes.
*I don't sell or work for any power meter company. Nor am I sponsored. 100% unbiased.
-
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby zill » Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:06 pm
durianrider wrote:Get a power meter if you want to get close to knowing what cals you are really chewing thru.
HR varies too much and the other methods garmin and strava use are vague at best.
A PM is the best part one can buy for their bike, assuming they already have a saddle.
I have them on all my most used bikes. I can afford any product on the market but found the Stages the lightest, stiffest and easiest to slap on my friends bikes in a few minutes.
*I don't sell or work for any power meter company. Nor am I sponsored. 100% unbiased.
Got Stages, the thing is for people who are right handed, their right leg is dominant as well so do you think Stages tend to underestimate power for right side dominated people or is the inherent level of variation in the Stages PM large enough to render this issue insignificant?
Also when out walking or running, what is the best way to measure calories burned? I have been recording walks on the Garmin then upload on Strava and specify that it's a walk. Stava then calculates calories burned. Is that way accurate? Are there more accurate ways of measuring calories burned when walking and running?
-
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Calorie: Garmin vs Strava
Postby zill » Sat Apr 18, 2015 9:34 pm
When riding, Gramin does not count the basal metabolic energy spent. It also assumes that the body burns a little over 4 times the amount of energy spent on pushing the cranks. In other words the body is a little under 25% efficient at transferring energy to the cranks.
Note that I use a Stages power meter.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.