Diet Thread
The information / discussion in the Cycling Health Forum is not qualified medical advice. Please consult your doctor.
-
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Nobody » Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:58 am
I'm probably going to eat about 850g of grapes this morning since they are still in season and relatively cheap. Been doing this for weeks. Haven't put on weight because of it.
http://glycemicindex.com/foodSearch.php ... &ak=detail
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22183
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Diet Thread
Postby mikesbytes » Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:47 am
As a rough rule of thumb most of the choices had sufficiently low enough Kj's providing you chose a 6 inch and not a foot long. There was a daily special and on Tuesday that's ham which was one of the lowest Kj options at about 1100Kj off memory meaning that it was in alignment with Macca's toastie while appearing to be more substantial
So I asked to have exactly what was in it for the Kj stated and as expected they didn't know, they looked at the picture with blank faces, so I asked them if it included a sauce and if so which one for the Kj stated. Then they started giving me answers which sounded entirely made up, the sauce was 1000 islands. I was also advised that it included all the vegetables. The inflection in their voice told me they were making it up.
Next I asked for a long black. She looked at me with a blank face and then gave me an empty paper cup [for the soft drink machine] I said no I want a long black and she went and asked the other lady what a long black was who then told me that the coffee machine (which was directly in front of me) wasn't working. As far as I could gather it wasn't working because they hadn't switched it on and they hadn't switched it on because they don't know how to make coffee. So I selected a lightly carbonated water from the fridge which had quite a nice taste I have to say.
Now I had noticed that they didn't ask me to choose the bread and the next customer who specified without being prompted was told it was baking. The reason became evident, it was yesterdays bread. Seriously, this had become my worst experience at a subway ever. It struck me as a business that was on death row, only a small number of customers, trade's who weren't fat.
I'll need to find another subway to get a proper evaluation of the service however there were some conclusions;
1. You can't accurately judge the Kj's based on what is displayed in the store and in this instance the staff were unable to help and in fact were misleading. My gut feeling at the shop is that if you want an accurate Kj figure then the breakfast all day was the option or you needed to do some pre-research
2. Considering that the nature of the food made it very easy to control the ingredients the lack of info on the bread could spread doubt to those who are vegetarian or vegan as the bread ingredients weren't readily available
3. There was no wrap option however there was flat bread and I could see from the breakfast menu that flat bread contains 200Kj more than the normal bread, so there seemed to be no reason to choose it unless you had a yeast allergy or the like
4. There was no marketing that pushed the core food, in this case the sandwich into a meal, which for the others is adding chips and soft drink so rather than becoming the default the cookie was an optional extra and the drinks had some better options except coffee and tea were missing in this instance
5. The low carb option was marketed with a photo of the ingredients of the sandwich in a paper bowl but there was no nutrition information at all, which appears to be a breach of govt regulation. It appeared to be chicken in the photo but the photo was really a guideline photo
2.
-
- Posts: 3459
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:23 am
Re: Diet Thread
Postby CKinnard » Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:58 am
If you eat high FII foods with low, digestion and absorption of the high is slowed.
What slows absorption best is unprocessed vegetable fiber (green leafys, celery, broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, etc)
Mike, you could write a complaint letter to Subway head office. They are a pretty pro-active group and don't put up with shoddy franchisees cos it makes all the others look bad. These staff are obviously a combo of poor training and poor life skills. A smart operator wouldn't buy a Subway if it was marginal. And even a good operator is subject to market forces that can maim them. My mate had one of his subways go through a 40% drop in sales when the shopping center exercised their right to shift him to another location in the center after a major renovation.
-
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Nobody » Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:07 pm
https://www.subway.com.au/menu/breads/mikesbytes wrote:3. There was no wrap option however there was flat bread and I could see from the breakfast menu that flat bread contains 200Kj more than the normal bread, so there seemed to be no reason to choose it unless you had a yeast allergy or the like
On the web site there is a wrap. Although like you said with flat bread, it's not lower than the "wheat" bread, so why bother.
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Baalzamon » Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:20 pm
People can just be allergic to the tomato skins.CKinnard wrote:I'd suggest you retest tomatoes 3 times. They are not known to cause glucose spikes.Baalzamon wrote:btw I'm just sussing out what foods I can eat safely that won't spike MY blood sugar within 1.5hrs or next morning window. I've found that happens with tomatoes to me.... Allergic reaction. Most likely due to nightshade family.
And regarding bananas, glucose spiking is also effected by dose and variety. So you might get higher BG if you ate 2 or 3 lady fingers in a sitting.
Yesterday Keto burger for lunch with 2 slices of tomato. Today blood sugar way higher than normal. Next I'm testing 2 slices of tomatoes without skin.... Yep people can be allergic to tomato skins and not the insides.
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Comedian » Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:31 pm
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Baalzamon » Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:38 pm
How is your sodium/potassium/magnesium intake?Comedian wrote:Well I'm giving LCHF a go. I'm certainly not trying for very low, just fairly low. So far I'm enjoying it although not so much the afternoon headache.
Headache is normally from low sodium
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Comedian » Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:57 pm
Good question... how do you quantify it?Baalzamon wrote:How is your sodium/potassium/magnesium intake?Comedian wrote:Well I'm giving LCHF a go. I'm certainly not trying for very low, just fairly low. So far I'm enjoying it although not so much the afternoon headache.
Headache is normally from low sodium
Either way I read that it's a contender for these headaches so I've started taking magnesium again and I'm having electrolyte on the bike and one during the day (Nuun Tab). Does that sound reasonable?
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Baalzamon » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:58 pm
I put 1g salt in my water bottles at least 5x daily and that is only half my sodium intake.
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Comedian » Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:37 pm
Thanks mate.. I'm going to have to try and add it up. I think you're right. LC diets miss out on the salt breads and pastas and the like..Baalzamon wrote:You need 5000mg sodium and 400mg magnesium. If your cycling you would need 7000mg sodium. Sodium and potassium are also linked. So make sure you have avocado, spinach, kale in real foods vs potassium supplements.
I put 1g salt in my water bottles at least 5x daily and that is only half my sodium intake.
However it seems as though it's highly variable.. IE it depends on how much you sweat, but even then some people sweat more salt than others. I'm going to have a think on this one.
-
- Posts: 3459
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:23 am
Re: Diet Thread
Postby CKinnard » Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:34 pm
There's a lot of important nuances that are lost in simplifying.
Both low and high sodium can cause severe headaches.
as can reduced caffeine or Calorie intake.
Reducing average salt intake reduces blood volume carried until an adaptive normalization occurs. But blood volume will also reduce on a Calorie deficit. reduced volume can trigger headaches, but should pass within a week.
https://www.nrv.gov.au/nutrients/sodium
osteoporosis, hypertension, stroke, arrhythmia risk
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16772639
It's appropriate to replace sodium salt if sweating when on longer rides (over 2 hours), but also potassium, calcium, magnesium.
Sodium concentration in sweat varies significantly but the median across studies into athletes in sub tropics is 800mg/L sweat. A lighter sweater on a hot day in a spirited ride might lose 1/2L/hour, moderate 1L/hr, heavy 2L/hr.
easiest way to determine sweat rate is weigh yourself before and after a ride, subtracting any fluids or food taken, and adding any urine (or just avoid it)
work out your hourly sweat rate, and take 2grams salt per liter.
To convert sodium quantities into salt, divide by 0.4.
LCHF diets are also prone to causing headaches relating to
- the switchover to more fat burning, and less reliance on glucose, which requires an adaptation via the brain.
- increased systemic inflammation if animal produce is increased and vegetable/fruit intake is below the Australian dietary guidelines.
-
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Nobody » Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:06 pm
It should be obvious, but people do at times question which is cheaper. Per calorie it might be cheaper to buy fast food. But if that's the main criteria, then a bottle of cheap vegetable oil at about $0.22 and 813 Cal per 100 mL, or the average daily energy intake (2300 Cal) for $0.62 should be a bargain.
_________________________________________________________________
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 141210.htmNearly half of all deaths in the United States in 2012 that were caused by cardiometabolic diseases, including heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes, have been linked to substandard eating habits, according to a study.
No surprises here either.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22183
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Diet Thread
Postby mikesbytes » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:37 pm
Nandos
What I found was a bit more upmarket than the other fast food chains. The first thing I noticed was the vegetarian menu, there was 5 choices proudly displayed and 4 of them had average or lower Kj ratings. One vegetarian option was high, that being the patty one. I couldn't be surprised to find out that they were actually vegan, but it wasn't displayed so external research would be needed and this is a walk in survey. Conclusion from that was that you could go there with most of friends and there would be something to eat despite their food preferences be it religion, health etc.
I was quite hungry and was prepare to buy a 2,400Kj burger however from what was obvious was that the burgers or the like were a lot lower in the Kj than the other places, there were quite a few choices around the 1,800Kj bracket.
Bread options there were 4, the burger, pita bread, wrap and Portuguese roll. It wasn't easy to decipher the Kj's of the bread as they were different offerings except for the pita bread vs the burger, the pita bread was 290kj lower than the burger with identical filling. Another predictor that the pita bread was lower is that the vegetarian Mushroom Pita offering was only 1,200 and something Kj's. I'll try that option another time, it was tempting.
So I went for a Chicken Perpori (spelling) Portuguese roll which was 1,800Kj with a solid slab of breast chicken, sauce and salad. the roll had a solid feel, it didn't swash like a burger from the other places. Sauce was a choice of very hot thru to totally mild. I've assumed the Kj's were the same but I have no info to base that assumption on.
Rather than been sold as a meal like Macca's and Hungry Jacks the meal option was presented as an extra, consisting of a side and a drink. There were about 6 sides to choose from and I was tired and hungry I elected to take the meal, I purchased a soft drink to spike my blood insulin but I have to confess I would of preferred a coffee but they don't sell it and of course I choose the salad. Price had jumped to $17.55 (off memory), making it the second most expensive lunch I'd had after the coffee shop under the gym. The burger (roll) was about $9.55 (off memory) but what bumped the price a lot was the extras, the salad was $3.95.
Now before we hit them about the price, I was given a number and the food brought to me on china plates, which I ate with metal fork and knife.
I'd say that while the salad was more expensive it was a little bigger and a little more elaborate than McDonald's but it didn't come with a sauce like McDonald's which was low Kj anyway.
Not many there when I was there. The few I saw I'd say were all around 25 BMI, so not as low as Subway but much thinner than McDonald's
-
- Posts: 3459
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:23 am
Re: Diet Thread
Postby CKinnard » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:49 pm
That's a surprise to me, because I would think the rate would be over 80%. The 20% allowing for autoimmune causes of T1D and congenital disorders of the heart and vascular system. One could argue that burst aneurysms are diet related. Many people would live a full life with many aneurysms if they did not eat crap, drink excessively, or smoke, and kept their BP low = PBWF diet!
When it comes to categorizing cause of death, I think the role of lifestyle choices is significantly blurred and misallocated. But it's been a while since I've read the methodology in depth. As an instance, motor vehicle accident deaths are categorized as .... accidents! But I don't think drunkeness, or inattention/sleep at the wheel due to sleep apnea due to obesity due to bad diet would factor a look in.
-
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Nobody » Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:01 pm
I knew (from a distance) a lady who died of an aneurysm. From what I heard she was cleaning the swimming pool and was found dead beside the pool. Probably early to mid 40s at the time. Left a husband and two preteen boys. They came from South Africa and so are big meat eaters (as I hear that's the norm there). Now even the sons look high overweight to obese in their early 20s. When I was in my early 20s I couldn't imagine being overweight/obese at that age. They probably have some serious health issues in front of them (like many their age) I would guess.CKinnard wrote:That's a surprise to me, because I would think the rate would be over 80%. The 20% allowing for autoimmune causes of T1D and congenital disorders of the heart and vascular system. One could argue that burst aneurysms are diet related. Many people would live a full life with many aneurysms if they did not eat crap, drink excessively, or smoke, and kept their BP low = PBWF diet!
Totally agree. So many problems could be traced back to lifestyle if the people involved in the investigation or categorisation dug a little deeper.CKinnard wrote:When it comes to categorizing cause of death, I think the role of lifestyle choices is significantly blurred and misallocated. But it's been a while since I've read the methodology in depth. As an instance, motor vehicle accident deaths are categorized as .... accidents! But I don't think drunkeness, or inattention/sleep at the wheel due to sleep apnea due to obesity due to bad diet would factor a look in.
-
- Posts: 3459
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:23 am
Re: Diet Thread
Postby CKinnard » Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:56 pm
I can tell you one the hardest sells is to convince them to eat less animal flesh and eat more vegetarian. They remind me of the reaction you got in Australia in the 1970s. Here's a country ranking of death rate from coronary heart disease which is probably skewed significantly by relative health care.
http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/caus ... y-country/
-
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Nobody » Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:03 pm
They appear to be the fifth highest for hypertension thought.CKinnard wrote:Here's a country ranking of death rate from coronary heart disease which is probably skewed significantly by relative health care.
http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/caus ... y-country/
-
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 7:59 pm
Re: Diet Thread
Postby RhapsodyX » Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:15 am
The paper.The annual chance of obese patients achieving five per cent weight loss was 1 in 12 for men and 1 in 10 for women. For those people who achieved five per cent weight loss, 53 per cent regained this weight within two years and 78 percent had regained the weight within five years.
Overall, only 1,283 men and 2,245 women with a BMI of 30-35 reached their normal body weight, equivalent to an annual probability of 1 in 210 for men and 1 in 124 for women; for those with a BMI above 40, the odds increased to 1 in 1,290 for men and 1 in 677 for women with severe obesity.
-
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:30 pm
- Location: Bundoora, Melbourne
Re: Diet Thread
Postby nezumi » Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:52 am
2015 Merida Scultura 5000
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Baalzamon » Sun Apr 02, 2017 2:31 pm
20% protein?
15% carb?
Sounds something like my ratio at the moment and I'm in nutritional ketosis but not full blown ketosis.
I'm having the odd banana now that is more greener than not. If they are too ripe they are too sweet for my taste buds. Heck a long black coffee can taste sweet now
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22183
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Diet Thread
Postby mikesbytes » Sun Apr 02, 2017 2:56 pm
Shocking and at the same time I'm not surprised. Its really hard to turn around a lifetime of poor choicesRhapsodyX wrote:A bit old (2015), but : Probability of losing 5% body weight or returning to normal weight.
The paper.The annual chance of obese patients achieving five per cent weight loss was 1 in 12 for men and 1 in 10 for women. For those people who achieved five per cent weight loss, 53 per cent regained this weight within two years and 78 percent had regained the weight within five years.
Overall, only 1,283 men and 2,245 women with a BMI of 30-35 reached their normal body weight, equivalent to an annual probability of 1 in 210 for men and 1 in 124 for women; for those with a BMI above 40, the odds increased to 1 in 1,290 for men and 1 in 677 for women with severe obesity.
-
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 7:59 pm
Re: Diet Thread
Postby RhapsodyX » Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:05 am
Not to mention... it'shard to turn around when confronted by food advertising and "manufactured food" being 80+% of what is available. It's not like people are pushed to make *informed* choices.mikesbytes wrote:Shocking and at the same time I'm not surprised. Its really hard to turn around a lifetime of poor choices
-
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:41 pm
Re: Diet Thread
Postby march83 » Mon Apr 03, 2017 11:02 am
I eat 90% carbs and my black coffee is predominantly sweet. I don't get the connection...Baalzamon wrote:Heck a long black coffee can taste sweet now
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Baalzamon » Mon Apr 03, 2017 11:04 am
I used to find black coffee bitter, or it could have just be the person making the it being a bad coffee makermarch83 wrote:I eat 90% carbs and my black coffee is predominantly sweet. I don't get the connection...Baalzamon wrote:Heck a long black coffee can taste sweet now
-
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Diet Thread
Postby Nobody » Mon Apr 03, 2017 11:27 am
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.