Yeah, I understand Michael Schumacher was wearing a helmet as well.bychosis wrote:Many people wear helmets for 'dangerous' activities. It is not uncommon for skiiers and snowboarders to wear helmets.
Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
- London Boy
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:43 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby London Boy » Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:51 pm
- feral grasshopper
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:13 pm
- Location: Adelaide SA
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby feral grasshopper » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:03 pm
Touché!London Boy wrote:Yeah, I understand Michael Schumacher was wearing a helmet as well.bychosis wrote:Many people wear helmets for 'dangerous' activities. It is not uncommon for skiiers and snowboarders to wear helmets.
- bychosis
- Posts: 7250
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby bychosis » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:11 pm
I’ve either written it poorly, or you’ve misunderstood. I wasn’t comparing Riding a bicycle on a country road to those activities. My point was that even though there are no mandatory laws, when the risks are high people are choosing to wear helmets.Scintilla wrote:Most of the sports you have listed actually have NO mandatory law about helmet-use (hang-gliding I'm not sure about), and regardless, to compare the risks of these activities with just riding a bicycle along a city, suburban, or country road is facetious to an extreme.
MTB, fast bunch rides, racing etc would continue to be moslty helmeted riders. Sunday arvo path rides etc would quite possibly see helmet use drop. I’d probably wear a helmet more than not, particularly as an example to my kids, but on a hot afternoon meander along a sharepath I’d rather wear a straw surfer style hat and protect myself against a more serious risk of skin cancer.
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby fat and old » Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:57 am
Sure, civil disobedience. Just make sure your people are Aboriginal, otherwise you've a long wait. Darwin is a special case, as is much of the northern half of Australia.Cyclophiliac wrote:If helmets aren't a deterrent in Darwin, is that because people just refuse to wear them and the authorities have given up try to rigorously enforce the MHL there? If so, that suggests an interesting course of action: anti-MHL "civil disobedience" across the country.
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby Scintilla » Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:26 pm
Yes, got that bit. I was just clarifying a common misnomer that so many helmet-law-afficionados commonly jump on board about - that SO many other common sporting activities are using helmets these days that it is all just a new social trend.bychosis wrote:I’ve either written it poorly, or you’ve misunderstood. I wasn’t comparing Riding a bicycle on a country road to those activities. My point was that even though there are no mandatory laws, when the risks are high people are choosing to wear helmets.Scintilla wrote:Most of the sports you have listed actually have NO mandatory law about helmet-use (hang-gliding I'm not sure about), and regardless, to compare the risks of these activities with just riding a bicycle along a city, suburban, or country road is facetious to an extreme.
Waiting for the new AFL-helmet laws. American gridiron use them and look at how much safer that is
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby Scintilla » Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:31 pm
The NT dropped the helmet laws for riders on shared paths WAY back in 1994 - just 2 years after the Feds had forced the law upon them. They had enough brains to realise the whole thing was a crock of sh**. $25 fines and no helmets on paths meant that police just stopped bothering with enforcement.fat and old wrote:Sure, civil disobedience. Just make sure your people are Aboriginal, otherwise you've a long wait. Darwin is a special case, as is much of the northern half of Australia.
I was up in Darwin last year - some/many people choose to wear helmets, even on paths. But many do NOT and it is all down to personal choice.
Civil disobedience, on a large scale, is the ONLY way we will be getting this crackpot law repealed, so start at it now. I generally refuse to wear a helmet for most shorter rides about town. On longer country tours I wear one, as I regard time-exposure to be the greatest risk factor. But I have no illusions about the protection value of a helmet in any motor vehicle collision. Saw the results of that with a friend's tragic death last year. Helmet made ZERO difference. Let's deal with the REAL elephant-in-the-room!
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby human909 » Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:09 pm
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby Scintilla » Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:17 pm
Another lady who laid down the gauntlet:
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby fat and old » Thu Mar 15, 2018 6:34 am
The fines added up for some in the community, people jumped on the bandwagon and the law was modified due to the "unfairness" of it all for some. The police didn't stop enforcing it, otherwise there'd have been no change.Scintilla wrote:The NT dropped the helmet laws for riders on shared paths WAY back in 1994 - just 2 years after the Feds had forced the law upon them. They had enough brains to realise the whole thing was a crock of sh**. $25 fines and no helmets on paths meant that police just stopped bothering with enforcement.fat and old wrote:Sure, civil disobedience. Just make sure your people are Aboriginal, otherwise you've a long wait. Darwin is a special case, as is much of the northern half of Australia.
Anecdote.Saw the results of that with a friend's tragic death last year. Helmet made ZERO difference
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby Scintilla » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:23 am
No, it is a fact.fat and old wrote:Anecdote.Saw the results of that with a friend's tragic death last year. Helmet made ZERO difference
Helmets are not designed to protect from motor vehicle impacts, only the sort of impact sustained by a person falling off a bicycle onto a paved surface (standardised head-form falling 2 metres onto hard surface; equal to about 20 kmh impact speed).
- bychosis
- Posts: 7250
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby bychosis » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:42 am
I think the 'anecdote' reference is that it was one incident and hardly scientific in examination. It is probably a little flippant in response to discussion of a fatality. Many of the 'helmet saved my life' clan use similar anecdotal evidence of a helmet in one crash 'saving' them from certain death. Anecdotal evidence with no scientific backing.Scintilla wrote:No, it is a fact.fat and old wrote:Anecdote.Saw the results of that with a friend's tragic death last year. Helmet made ZERO difference
Helmets are not designed to protect from motor vehicle impacts, only the sort of impact sustained by a person falling off a bicycle onto a paved surface (standardised head-form falling 2 metres onto hard surface; equal to about 20 kmh impact speed).
I fully agree that a foam bucket wont do much in the event of a crash with a car or truck though.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby human909 » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:29 am
And I've been part of 'starting' (continuing) it. But like I've said there is a time and a place which is dependent on many factors.Scintilla wrote:It has to start somewhere.
She has and all the respect to her. She has also STOPPED cycling due to police harassment on the issue.Scintilla wrote:Sue Abbott has laid the gauntlet down already; she needs our support.
Fair call. But like has been pointed out it is simply the counter anecdote to 'a helmet saved my life'. The conclusion that can be readily reached through both anecdotes and statistics is helmets CAN be effective and sometimes they CAN be ineffective.fat and old wrote:Anecdote.Saw the results of that with a friend's tragic death last year. Helmet made ZERO difference
Like has been said numerous times the effectiveness is hardly the issue when cycling injuries that would be reduced by helmets are so few and far between particularly for more sedate forms of cycling.
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby fat and old » Thu Mar 15, 2018 4:55 pm
Twas a response to thehuman909 wrote:Fair call. But like has been pointed out it is simply the counter anecdote to 'a helmet saved my life'. The conclusion that can be readily reached through both anecdotes and statistics is helmets CAN be effective and sometimes they CAN be ineffective.fat and old wrote:Anecdote.Saw the results of that with a friend's tragic death last year. Helmet made ZERO difference
1. Often used word when a pro-helmet argument is put forward.
2. The same word being used when I recounted my brothers cycling death from head injuries sustained while not wearing a helmet (pre MHL's). I accept it as anecdote, just keeping the conversation on an even keel.
As you well know, I am pro-choice, anti-window dressing.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6606
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Meanwhile, across the dutch
Postby Thoglette » Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:15 pm
"Evaluation of New Zealand’s bicycle helmet law" Colin F Clarke NZMJ 10 February 2012, Vol 125 No 1349; (discussed on the NZ MHL page on Wikipedia)
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:49 am
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Meanwhile, across the dutch
Postby Scott_C » Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:50 pm
The full article is freely available online here:Thoglette wrote:"Evaluation of New Zealand’s bicycle helmet law" Colin F Clarke NZMJ 10 February 2012, Vol 125 No 1349;
https://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/read-th ... cle-clarke
- uart
- Posts: 3208
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby uart » Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:25 pm
Yes. I think that the last straw was when she was riding near her home, about 20km out of a small country town (Scone), on a dead end gravel road that sees half a dozen cars a day. A "concerned citizen" phoned the police to say "she's at it again" and they sent a squad car all the way out there just to book here. It really is an absurd situation IMHO.human909 wrote:She has and all the respect to her. She has also STOPPED cycling due to police harassment on the issue.Scintilla wrote:Sue Abbott has laid the gauntlet down already; she needs our support.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby human909 » Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:02 pm
One of the early helmet-less rides in Melbourne had police descend on it and start fining people. The one last year had tacit approval from the authorities though one or two were fine on the way to the event.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6606
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby Thoglette » Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:12 pm
This is, anecdotally, one of the reasons for even lower rates of cycling in regions than in urban centres: the local Plod is not stretched as far but has to ensure that the rule of law is maintained and respected, at least generally. Resulting in the sort of silliness reported above (Or cue youtube clip of PC Joe Penhale theatrics)uart wrote:A "concerned citizen" phoned the police to say "she's at it again" and they sent a squad car all the way out there just to book here. It really is an absurd situation IMHO.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- bychosis
- Posts: 7250
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby bychosis » Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:14 pm
I can’t justify riding solo without a helmet just to make a point when it could cost me $400. Back when it was $50-70 taking the punt wasn’t so bad.
Edit: the example of the plod being called out to fine good ol Sue was probably as a result of her being a local councillor. If she has not been ‘of inportance’ No one would have rung up because she would have been just that crazy lady up the road.
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby Scintilla » Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:18 pm
IF I incur any TIN for not wearing a helmet, I DO NOT intend to make ANY payments to Victorian Government coffers. I *will* take a stand!human909 wrote:Yep. I am not prepared to throw money to the wind simply to make a statement regarding helmets. I am sick of getting fined for stupid reasons, I've given enough money to the government fine department that I can't be bothered the hassle of more fines for going helmetless.....
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby human909 » Fri Mar 16, 2018 10:12 pm
An interesting position to take. I give you a nod of respect in your general direction if you have thought this through entirely and would follow through.... But if ordered by the court to pay a penalty I'm curious on what "stand" you intend to take.Scintilla wrote:IF I incur any TIN for not wearing a helmet, I DO NOT intend to make ANY payments to Victorian Government coffers. I *will* take a stand!
The thing about lawbreakers taking a stand is generally nobody notices. There have been plenty of marijuana smokers, drug dealers, and other law breakers who have 'taken a stand' and lost.
Likewise I once got a VIC fine that only occured due to my honesty. It was absurd and contrary to many years of previous policy. I could have taken a 'stand' but the bureaucracy would have won. Far easier just to pay to the coffers. If I felt indignant enough about the injustice I could readily recoup my financial losses by dodging the system and not adhering to the honesty system of payment.
For what it is worth I would probably contest a helmet fine if I received one. But I don't think it is as simple as not paying and "taking a stand" for your average citizen.
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby Scintilla » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:18 pm
2. Notification to court of intention to contest.
3. Seeking further legal (and other) advice. Freestyle Cyclists are developing a fund for this purpose.
4. Magistrates hearing. Presentation of my case about the deep belief I have that the law is false and unjust.
5. Undoubted finding of guilt. Larger fine imposed
6. My refusal to pay.
7. Possible sheriff confiscation of property.
8. If possible I will go to prison for non-payment rather than any property acquisition.
Along the way I will make a bit of noise. I do not expect that it would pan out in my favour, though I have heard of several in Victoria who have admitted the 'offence', and presented their case for non-wearing, and then been dismissed with no fine.
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby fat and old » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:55 pm
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby human909 » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:47 pm
From my understanding it was only the Sydney cops who decided to turn up the notch on a police state attitude. 7 cop cars taken off other important duties to come out and find people for riding without helmets.
Apparently they claim they have no discretion. BS. That discretion is being chosen every day across Sydney, the State and the Nation.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
Postby human909 » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:47 pm
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.