BobtheBuilder wrote:Either way the pedestrian still has right of way and the cyclist had a duty to look around. If a car killed a cyclist, even when the cyclist was technically "wrong", most cyclists wouldn't let the MV driver off that easily.
Granted. Yet it all depends upon the exact circumstances of what occurred. Did the rider have any chance to take evasive action? Was the pedestrian already on the crossing, or had he just stepped out?
BobtheBuilder wrote:There is still a duty to take due care, which riding 25km/h on the inside lane, with blind spots ahead (caused by MVs), through a just turned green light isn't.
We do not know that. You are presuming much. Police established the circumstances using CCTV and dash-cam I believe and decided the cyclist was not at fault, that he acted lawfully and did not breach his duty towards the pedestrian.
I trust they had the facts, and shall leave it at that.