You wouldn't want to admit that. It would form evidence that the "left turn" was directed at the cyclist thus changing "reckless driving" into "assault".uart wrote:..something to do with the cyclist somehow touching the guy's car. Presumably due to a close pass by the driver.
A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6621
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby Thoglette » Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:09 pm
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:49 am
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby Scott_C » Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:20 pm
Provocation is a defense against an assault charge and operates on the level of an "ordinary person." It would be hard to argue that an "ordinary person" wouldn't try and assault you if you keyed their car.Thoglette wrote:You wouldn't want to admit that. It would form evidence that the "left turn" was directed at the cyclist thus changing "reckless driving" into "assault".uart wrote:..something to do with the cyclist somehow touching the guy's car. Presumably due to a close pass by the driver.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby human909 » Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:03 pm
True. I was saying touch because I've seen similar angry behaviour from drivers from as little as a touch. AKA I've banged on peoples windows as they have tried merge on top of me. Drivers act as though their you've killed their first born child. I've had two people get out of their cars to try to assault me.AdelaidePeter wrote:"Touch" is very different from "run a key along".
I still can't believe that magistrates are not prepared to send a message to people who use their cars as weapons.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby human909 » Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:05 pm
Did you mean the double negative. I don't think an ordinary person assaults people for keying a car.Scott_C wrote:It would be hard to argue that an "ordinary person" wouldn't try and assault you if you keyed their car.
QLD law, but I'd expect VIC isn't too different.
It is pretty clear that the force used is disproportionate and could likely cause death or grievous bodily harm.(1) A person is not criminally responsible for an assault committed upon a person who gives the person provocation for the assault, if the person is in fact deprived by the provocation of the power of self-control, and acts upon it on the sudden and before there is time for the person’s passion to cool, and if the force used is not disproportionate to the provocation and is not intended, and is not such as is likely, to cause death or grievous bodily harm.
(2) Whether any particular act or insult is such as to be likely to deprive an ordinary person of the power of self-control and to induce the ordinary person to assault the person by whom the act or insult is done or offered, and whether, in any particular case, the person provoked was actually deprived by the provocation of the power of self-control, and whether any force used is or is not disproportionate to the provocation, are questions of fact.
Of course an ordinary motorist....
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby fat and old » Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:05 pm
I'd wager you're wrong. And I'm taking that literally....an ordinary person, not a motorist. The assault could easily turn into battery if the victim is hot headed, stupid or feels they'll win.human909 wrote: I don't think an ordinary person assaults people for keying a car.
Everyone wants to have a go these days....
-
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 5:13 pm
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby madmacca » Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:37 pm
The keying and the bicycle toss into the garden deserve each other - property damage. Deliberately driving a vehicle into someone else is a whole 'nother thing.AdelaidePeter wrote:"Touch" is very different from "run a key along".human909 wrote:Given the article says he admitted it and was convicted then I'm not sure about the "big if".AdelaidePeter wrote:If the story is true (and granted that's a big "if"; I'd like to see the full video)
It sounds to me that the message being sent out by our courts is that it is ok to deliberately drive your vehicle into somebody if they touch your vehicle beforehand.
But just clarifying, I'm not saying the cyclist deserved it. I'm saying they were both idiots and both deserved some punishment, and the driver should have received a more severe sentence than he got.
Provided you can get the story of about the keying admitted into evidence, then there is no way that a jury is going to believe that swerve is anything but intentional.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby mikesbytes » Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:09 pm
I'm wondering what actions happened prior to the keyingMr Giarrusso has had various run ins with the law and had been serving a community corrections order when the incident happened
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:13 pm
- Location: Western Sydney
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby JPB » Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:50 pm
The second story sounds fishy
- cyclotaur
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:36 pm
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby cyclotaur » Thu Nov 01, 2018 7:07 pm
I doubt he did anything to provoke this other than maybe momentarily inconveniencing the driver. I have sons who ride bikes for transport in inner city areas and I worry about them all the time, with the usual traffic and distracted drivers, much less ‘angry man’ drivers like this going around.
I’m glad the guy was caught and penalised, albeit inadequately. I’m more concerned that the victim here is probably still suffering the after effects psychologically/physically a year later. I hope he is going ok.
My old blog - A bit of fun
"Riding, not racing...completing, not competing"
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby human909 » Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:07 pm
Agreed.JPB wrote:I dunno, if I had damaged some fellas car (not that I would) I would not continue cycling down the road. I would be disappearing very quickly so that I could not be subject to retaliation.
If somebody in an expensive 4WD cuts me off and as a consequence their left wing mirror is in my path and collides with me shattering across the road. I am not sticking in a vulnerable position on the road.
Hypothetically of course....
There are several occasions that male pride has made me stand up to road bullies. There have also been several occasions where caution has caused me to retreat away from bullies because they are driving 2tonne vehicles.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2018 8:33 pm
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby JitterBugs » Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:13 pm
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby human909 » Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:23 pm
Really? Sure there are a minority of nutters out there. But the society I see on the streets avoids physical confrontation, particularly in public.fat and old wrote:I'd wager you're wrong. And I'm taking that literally....an ordinary person, not a motorist. The assault could easily turn into battery if the victim is hot headed, stupid or feels they'll win.
Everyone wants to have a go these days....
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby NASHIE » Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:42 pm
Yes, i think most of us do mate. Banned from driving that is.JitterBugs wrote:Does anyone else think this driver should from driving completely for several years?
- Cheesewheel
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:22 pm
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby Cheesewheel » Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:04 am
Doesn't happen in australia.JitterBugs wrote:Does anyone else think this driver should from driving completely for several years?
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby fat and old » Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:00 am
human909 wrote:Agreed.JPB wrote:I dunno, if I had damaged some fellas car (not that I would) I would not continue cycling down the road. I would be disappearing very quickly so that I could not be subject to retaliation.
If somebody in an expensive 4WD cuts me off and as a consequence their left wing mirror is in my path and collides with me shattering across the road. I am not sticking in a vulnerable position on the road.
Hypothetically of course....
There are several occasions that male pride has made me stand up to road bullies. There have also been several occasions where caution has caused me to retreat away from bullies because they are driving 2tonne vehicles.
We are in agreement here old mate.
One thing that doesn't sit well is the use of social media, what? 12 months after the incident?, to have a go at the driver. The young bloke is not stupid apparently but that was a bit of a sook move. He clearly hasn't got over it, and is a vindictive little prick. If he knew the blokes address to post it online, why didn't he go round and have a face to face as he came out the door? No worries about being vulnerable on the road then.
Maybe I spend more time getting about than you? I see confrontation every day. Ranging from the finger to yelling abuse to shaping up and belting each other or even funnier ramming each other in their cars I had an old bogan woman yell at me last night in a shopping centre carpark because she cut the corner entering a lane and found me and the 4wd right in front of her. My fault apparently that she had to stomp her brakes. It doesn't take much these days for that to escalate into a few pushes and shoves. Apparently, we're all stressed and in a hurry. For what I dunno….maybe our funerals?Really? Sure there are a minority of nutters out there. But the society I see on the streets avoids physical confrontation, particularly in public.
Which shows that if you're going to assert yourself you'd best be prepared for the consequences. No point being tough from beneath the wheels of a 3 ton (yeah, those things are closer to 3T than 2) 4wd!The driver has a background
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby mikesbytes » Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:24 pm
- uart
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby uart » Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:04 pm
I'm not entirely sure if he posted the drivers address (maybe he did), or if other internet users looked up the court case and did some detective work to put that out there.fat and old wrote:He clearly hasn't got over it, and is a vindictive little prick. If he knew the blokes address to post it online, why didn't he go round and have a face to face as he came out the door? No worries about being vulnerable on the road then.
I would love to hear BOTH accounts though (first hand), of the FULL incident.
-
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:13 am
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby AdelaidePeter » Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:32 pm
Assuming the rumours of him vandalising the car are false, I support the cyclist here. He waited until the court case was over, saw that justice was not done, so got his own bit of revenge. He didn't confront the driver face to face because his aim was to shame him, not get into a fist fight.uart wrote:I'm not entirely sure if he posted the drivers address (maybe he did), or if other internet users looked up the court case and did some detective work to put that out there.fat and old wrote:He clearly hasn't got over it, and is a vindictive little prick. If he knew the blokes address to post it online, why didn't he go round and have a face to face as he came out the door? No worries about being vulnerable on the road then.
I would love to hear BOTH accounts though (first hand), of the FULL incident.
But if he actually did vandalise the car, then he should have just copped it sweet, because all it also puts more scrutiny on him (the cyclist).
- uart
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby uart » Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:23 pm
Yeah, I guess we'll never really know unless we hear both sides, but I suspect that there was some sort of close passing or other intimidation on behalf of the driver, and some sort of retaliatory car touching (whether or not with keys in hand) on behalf of the cyclist. Probably a case of dumb and dumber if I'm being honest.AdelaidePeter wrote: Assuming the rumours of him vandalising the car are false,
BTW. Many years ago I worked with "old mate" who cycled to/from work with one of those orange plastic/rubber hand thingies hanging out the side - to show cars what was too close. It used to pee him off no end that some drivers still came too close and brushed by it.
Anyway, he was convinced that it was a good idea to tape a really sharp metal point onto the end of his plastic hand, just as a bit of retribution to cars coming too close. In the end I convinced him that the liability to pedestrians (and other cyclists) made it a bad idea. But he was really keen on the idea for a while.
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby fat and old » Fri Nov 02, 2018 5:09 pm
Why are you assuming? The reporting was quite clear.AdelaidePeter wrote:
Assuming the rumours of him vandalising the car are false, I support the cyclist here. He waited until the court case was over, saw that justice was not done, so got his own bit of revenge. He didn't confront the driver face to face because his aim was to shame him, not get into a fist fight.
But if he actually did vandalise the car, then he should have just copped it sweet, because all it also puts more scrutiny on him (the cyclist).
You reckon the paper flat out lied? And as for shaming, what’s the point in putting the !! BAN ME NOW FOR SWEARING !! mobile number out there? Community shaming? Is that how it’s done? I’m serious here, I have no idea how or what the accepted moves are in a shaming?University mathematics student Jack McDonnell, 29, admitted to running a key along Michael Giarrusso's Nissan Patrol 4WD as he cycled alongside him in Melbourne's St Kilda.
I will admit to a strong initial disliking of the cyclist based solely on the pics of him in that on line story. They did a number on him there! Classic smarmy self righteous green voting prat look.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6621
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby Thoglette » Fri Nov 02, 2018 6:20 pm
Links anyone? If the two were, as they say, "known to each other" or "had a previous altercation" then I'd love to see the magistrate's basis for throwing out the assault charges.fat and old wrote:The reporting was quite clear.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby find_bruce » Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:38 pm
Who says the magistrate threw out the assault charges? When a person pleads guilty and the other charges are dismissed, it is almost always the result of a plea bargain where the prosecutor agrees to withdraw the more serious charges. That is what the daily snail suggests, but I wouldn't put too much stock in newspaper reports of the actual details.Thoglette wrote:Links anyone? If the two were, as they say, "known to each other" or "had a previous altercation" then I'd love to see the magistrate's basis for throwing out the assault charges.
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby trailgumby » Sat Nov 03, 2018 4:06 pm
The Daily Fail. They're a business whose model is to sell audiences to advertisers. Just look at the rest of their articles in the sidebar links. Do you think they take as much care as, say, the Sydney Morning Herald, which at least appears to take some pride in its independence and thoroughness? Lets just say they handle the truth carelessly.fat and old wrote:You reckon the paper flat out lied?
A guy tried to kill me Anzac Day last year, taking me for a short ride at high G's on the bonnet of his Corolla after deliberately driving into my then-new car and then stealing my phone when I was taking photographs of the evidence. A thousand dollar fine and 18 months driving suspension, reduced to 1 year on appeal. If I had access to the CCTV and his contact details I'd publish them in a flash.fat and old wrote:And as for shaming, what’s the point in putting the !! BAN ME NOW FOR SWEARING !! mobile number out there? Community shaming? Is that how it’s done? I’m serious here, I have no idea how or what the accepted moves are in a shaming?
Precisely as intended by the author and editor of the article. Try applying a propaganda model to what you read in the mass media, from any source. I find it quite illuminating.fat and old wrote:I will admit to a strong initial disliking of the cyclist based solely on the pics of him in that on line story. They did a number on him there! Classic smarmy self righteous green voting prat look.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: A cowards attack on a vulnerable road user
Postby mikesbytes » Sat Nov 03, 2018 7:23 pm
https://road.cc/content/news/251063-mor ... r-question
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.