Car lobby opposes EU safety bid that 'would save 1,300 lives a year'

[Ross]

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... ves-a-year

Car industry lobbyists are pushing the EU to weaken safety technology proposals, even though their own research predicts the move would cause more than 1,000 extra road deaths each year.

The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (Acea) is fiercely opposing an EU attempt to benchmark a technology that automatically reduces car speeds to local limits. The group favours one that just sends speeding drivers a dashboard warning.

Letters seen by the Guardian show that Acea last month had to remove claims from its website that speed limit information (SLI) technology was “an effective alternative” to intelligent speed assistance (ISA) “combined with better enforcement and driver training.” This came after TRL, the expert consultants to whom it had jointly attributed the claim, said it was “not true” and “damaging [to its] reputation”.
Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more

Richard Cuerder, TRL’s director, said in a message to the European transport safety council (ETSC): “If every [vehicle] in the EU28 today was fitted with SLI instead of ISA, approximately 1,300 more people would be killed on our roads every year. SLI is not an effective alternative to ISA.”

Cuerder confirmed to the Guardian that Acea had been made aware of the figures, and TRL’s objections to the claims about SLI.

Despite this, Acea has continued to use the “effective alternative” phrase in its lobby material, and the wording has been inserted into nine amendments to the EU package now being proposed by three MEPs.

Antonio Avenoso, the ETSC director, told the Guardian: “These new vehicle safety standards will have a hugely important impact on reducing deaths on European roads. So it’s critical that the political discussion is not frustrated by misleading information.

“That a handful of MEPs are trying to copy-paste this into the legislation itself is very worrying. The price would be paid in lives lost that otherwise would not have been.”

None of the three rightwing MEPs proposing the amendments – Jacqueline Foster, Andor Deli or Massimiliano Salini – immediately responded to requests for comment.

Acea declined to discuss its interactions with MEPs or its reasons for repeating the disputed claims. Acea says on its website: “ISA technology holds promise for the future.” However, a spokesperson said it “still shows too many false warnings due to incorrect road signs and outdated speed limit information – something that most consumers will not accept.”

This is contested by Mobileye, a leading safety tech supplier, which says ISA systems have an accuracy rate of 90-95% and rising in the EU.

ISA, which is used by some Ford cars, employs traffic sign recognition systems and GPS satellite to adjust car speeds. It turns itself off in inclement conditions and can be manually over-ridden.

ISA is one of 16 safety measures – including automated emergency braking and motorway lane assistance – in the EU general safety regulation aimed at cutting road deaths by 25,000 – one year’s death toll at present – over a 15-year period.

[find_bruce]

If I understand it correctly, one of the errors with sign recognition is the speed limit signs on the back of buses which cause the car to slow to 40 even when the lights aren’t flashing

[fat and old]

ISA. Intelligent Speed Assessment. Camera records speed of vehicle. If vehicle is over the limit, owner is banned from driving for 12 months unless they nominate another licensed driver. If driver is unlicensed, car is sold at auction with proceeds to owner.

IUA. Intelligent Use Assessment. Camera records vehicle. If driver is shown to be using a mobile device, same penalties apply.

Too much reliance on technology to help people carry out basic life functions. If people are not capable of controlling their vehicle as per the current laws, banned for 12 months.

I note that the current Vic. penalty for mobile use is $484.00 and 4 points. It's unbelievable that this isn't enough to stop people until you realise the odds of being caught are 1,000,000,000,000 to 1. Bring in the cameras.

Oh, and allow public reporting of mobile offences, similar to the EPA notifications. I'd be happy to mount a camera at every angle on my vehicles and pushy to submit evidence. IN fact, I'd spend an hour a day at an intersection just taking happy snaps of idiots at lights scrolling away waiting for a green.

[opik_bidin]

https://www.news.com.au/technology/inno ... b3aa4afb94

This driver might have been more brazen, but Sydney drivers sneaking a glimpse at their mobile phones may want to reconsider.

World-first technology capable of catching drivers illegally using their phones will be piloted at two locations in the city.

In May New South Wales became the first state to pass laws allowing the red-light cameras capable of detecting drivers using mobile phones.

Roads Minister Melinda Pavey launched the trial that uses the Australian-developed technology on Sunday, following a successful testing phase.

Australian company Acusensus will trial the hi-tech cameras on the M4 and Anzac Parade from January.

Mrs Pavey said during the month long test period in October, more than 11,000 drivers a day were detected using a mobile phone illegally.