Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:57 pm
Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby newblah » Fri Sep 19, 2014 11:21 am
I am looking at a 2014/2015 Cannondale Supersix Ultegra at the moment.
Seen here:
http://media.cannondale.com/media/catal ... 192875.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.cannondale.com/nam_en/2014/b ... -3-ultegra" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.cannondale.com/nam_en/2015/b ... -3-ultegra" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I frequently need to carry the bike on a towball-mounted bike rack on my car, does it seem likely that the cables would become damage or would rub against the frame and cause it to leave marks? I am loving this bike but it seems quite odd that on such a nice frame they decided to not run internal cabling!
thanks
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby Mulger bill » Fri Sep 19, 2014 11:31 am
I'd be getting one of those bar thingies that clamp between stem and post and clamp that to the carrier.
Oh wait, I have one...
London Boy 29/12/2011
- KGB
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:49 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby KGB » Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:49 pm
When I was a kid we used to wrap a soft cloth under the cables, they were steel bikes though.
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby RonK » Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:52 pm
If you use a clamp-tyre rack on a CF frame you have more than scratches to worry about. Use a two-arm rack like this Thule, which has soft rubber cups with grooves for the cables.
- Marx
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:36 pm
- Location: Flemington Melbourne Australia
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby Marx » Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:58 pm
If you're a bike mechanic, you appreciate the external cabling.
A bike and a place to ride.
-
- Posts: 6180
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby fat and old » Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:31 pm
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby Xplora » Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:47 pm
While external cables aren't necessarily uncommon, the reason you go internal is aesthetics and the reason you go carbon is because you aren't concerned about spending a couple of bucks to ensure you are using the right carrier for the job. Alloy doesn't punish you for bad carrier choice, but it punishes you on the hills
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby rkelsen » Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:22 pm
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:57 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby newblah » Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:27 pm
Are those two-arm bike racks still a problem to transport carbon frames? I presume it is only the single-clamp bike racks that are a problem? Surely the 7.5kg bicycle lying on top of two arms, strapped down so it can't move anywhere won't be an issue
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby Dai » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:21 pm
Correct.newblah wrote:Are those two-arm bike racks still a problem to transport carbon frames? I presume it is only the single-clamp bike racks that are a problem? Surely the 7.5kg bicycle lying on top of two arms, strapped down so it can't move anywhere won't be an issue
Clamps are generally a bad idea with CF bikes, but there's no need to be too paranoid.
The problem is the clamping force, not the supporting of the bike by the frame. So the Thule rack above with the rubber cradles is fine, because the only additional pressure is from the rubber strap. It's not actually clamping as such. I've also regularly transported a carbon bike on one of these racks:
You need to be a bit more careful, but again, the clamps are flexible rubber and the bike is supported by it's wheels, so there is no need to tighten it any more than finger tight. Both of the above are a better idea than the frame adapter.
I know too many people that have had bikes fall out (or partially fall out) of these:
What you ABSOLUTELY DON'T WANT is one of these:
which require you to tighten the frame substantially in order to stop the bike swinging.
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby Dai » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:29 pm
The main downside of these racks is that they can be a bit challenging to get two bikes onto - although to be fair, multiple bikes on most bike racks is a bit like playing twister.
[/quote]
- outnabike
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:53 pm
- Location: Melbourne Vic
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby outnabike » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:43 pm
A friend who runs Lcool
http://www.isi-carriers.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby RonK » Fri Sep 19, 2014 9:11 pm
Err no - I regularly carry two on mine and it's a piece of cake loading them.Dai wrote:The main downside of these racks is that they can be a bit challenging to get two bikes onto - although to be fair, multiple bikes on most bike racks is a bit like playing twister.
And it's only a little more difficult loading three.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:01 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby b1 » Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:10 pm
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- outnabike
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:53 pm
- Location: Melbourne Vic
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby outnabike » Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:17 pm
That will teach you to ask two questions with the one post, won't it? No one cares weather or not you bike has internal cables or not.... We just wanna sell you a bike rack.newblah wrote:Hi all.
I am looking at a 2014/2015 Cannondale Supersix Ultegra at the moment.
Seen here:
http://media.cannondale.com/media/catal ... 192875.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.cannondale.com/nam_en/2014/b ... -3-ultegra" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.cannondale.com/nam_en/2015/b ... -3-ultegra" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I frequently need to carry the bike on a towball-mounted bike rack on my car, does it seem likely that the cables would become damage or would rub against the frame and cause it to leave marks? I am loving this bike but it seems quite odd that on such a nice frame they decided to not run internal cabling!
thanks
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby Dai » Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:00 pm
There's your answer!outnabike wrote: No one cares weather or not you bike has internal cables or not....
Oh and Cannondale's are beautiful bikes however I had a particularly bad experience trying to get them to honour a warranty claim, so I'd pretty much recommend anything else.
-
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:37 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby harmonix1234 » Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:20 pm
I'll take quality shifting and brake modulation over 1/2 a watt of aero gains hands down.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:57 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby newblah » Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:48 pm
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:57 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby newblah » Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:49 pm
Next mission will be to sell my 2013 Avanti Giro 3. I'm hoping there is some sort of market for used bikes!
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 2:27 pm
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby trackside » Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:13 am
- nickobec
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:51 am
- Location: Perth or 42km south as the singlespeed flies
- Contact:
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby nickobec » Mon Sep 22, 2014 7:52 am
Those who truly love their bike, sell their car and buy a van.trackside wrote:Back seat or boot wrapped in a blanket or in bike bags....it's the only option for those who truly love their bike
Me when I bought a new car, made sure the bike would fit in the back, Hatchback with the seats down and front wheel off bike.
-
- Posts: 1595
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:42 am
- Location: Red Hill, Brisbane
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby petal665 » Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:54 am
- elantra
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:01 am
- Location: NSW and QLD
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby elantra » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:13 pm
I suspect it is because the Evo frame is so high tech that the entry points for internal cables would be incompatable with its tensile properties.petal665 wrote:Strange the EVO doesn't have internal brake cables. 2014 CAAD10 does. Internal cabling looks nice, has no other benefit and lots of negatives.
BH Ultralight is similar, i think - also a top end frame of cutting-edge low weight that similarly does not have internal cabling.
-
- Posts: 1595
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:42 am
- Location: Red Hill, Brisbane
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby petal665 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:23 pm
The Evo high mod has internal rear brake cable (and has since it was introduced) and I also have the Ultralight which has internal gear and brake cables.
- elantra
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:01 am
- Location: NSW and QLD
Re: Is a lack of interior cabling odd on a $3,500 bike?
Postby elantra » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:46 pm
Was looking at a 2012 RIDE mag over the weekend and the piccies of both these bikes on test looked like external cabling in 2012
Return to “Buying a bike / parts”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.