Recommending inexpensive bike computers

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22183
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby mikesbytes » Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:43 pm

Every so often we get asked about bike computers. My usual response to recommend a Garmin 500 as the minimum purchase however not everyone's bike computer budget stretches that far. And of course it boils down to requirements which can be a bit thin for those who haven't owned one before.

So here's some generic requirements;
- low price
- durability
- readability

In regards to capabilities suppose we can look at in levels;
1. Provides speed and distance and doesn't break at the first sign of water or a minor bump
2. Readability
3. Wired vs wireless
4. Additional basic inputs such as cadence
5. Ability to export summary info to a computer
6. Advanced inputs, ie heart rate and GPS
7. Ability to export detailed info to a computer and input into popular applications
8. Additional capabilities such as maps

So what about this budget one? http://www.velogear.com.au/cycling-acce ... puter.html
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
mitchy_
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 11:15 am
Contact:

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby mitchy_ » Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:58 pm

subscribed... also interested in a low cost option.
i currently just use my phone to track ride info, however am reluctant to carry it on the MTB as i can almost guarantee i'll land on it...

this one from Topeak looks like a decent option, ~$150 with a bluetooth speed/cadence sensor... anyone use one?
http://www.topeak.com/products/PanoBike ... r_w_scs_bk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Milar
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:11 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Milar » Wed Jan 21, 2015 3:49 pm

A Simple GPS unit is the Edge 200 http://www.99bikes.com.au/computer-gps-garmin-edge-200" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You get a GPS and course data but no ANT+ so no good if you want HR and cadence etc. It's also relatively cheap to get another mount if you have multiple bikes.

User avatar
Classikbike
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:56 am

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Classikbike » Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:09 pm

I only wanted rather basic info so I got myself a Cateye Padrone. Nice price, very large screen, bomb and weather proof (actually crashed on it really hard at high speed, only has a scratch mark) and all the basic info I needed.
http://www.cateye.com/en/products/detail/CC-PA100W/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

}SkOrPn--7
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby }SkOrPn--7 » Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:34 pm

mitchy_ wrote:subscribed... also interested in a low cost option.
i currently just use my phone to track ride info, however am reluctant to carry it on the MTB as i can almost guarantee i'll land on it...

this one from Topeak looks like a decent option, ~$150 with a bluetooth speed/cadence sensor... anyone use one?
http://www.topeak.com/products/PanoBike ... r_w_scs_bk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have one and going to buy a second but while I don't use all the added extras it's a neat unit and works well plus the mount is nice. I got mine from Velogear so all up sensor and computer delivered was $159.00. Pushys also have them but at the time Velogear was better priced.

Ricky

User avatar
mitchy_
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 11:15 am
Contact:

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby mitchy_ » Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:39 pm

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:
mitchy_ wrote:subscribed... also interested in a low cost option.
i currently just use my phone to track ride info, however am reluctant to carry it on the MTB as i can almost guarantee i'll land on it...

this one from Topeak looks like a decent option, ~$150 with a bluetooth speed/cadence sensor... anyone use one?
http://www.topeak.com/products/PanoBike ... r_w_scs_bk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have one and going to buy a second but while I don't use all the added extras it's a neat unit and works well plus the mount is nice. I got mine from Velogear so all up sensor and computer delivered was $159.00. Pushys also have them but at the time Velogear was better priced.

Ricky
cool cool. from what i can tell it doesn't have GPS built in, but can use it via your phone?

at ~$150 with the speed/cadence sensor, it seems more attractive than the Garmin 200, which doesn't have one (nor is it compatible)

}SkOrPn--7
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby }SkOrPn--7 » Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:23 pm

Mitchy if you use your phone and the topeak app it opens up to a bunch of other uses and while I haven't paired it to the phone I can't give any jnfo. I got mine when it first hit Australia last year and many were saying that tbe app was buggy as hell but I guess by now things would have improved.

I also looked at Wahoo which is cheaper if you just want to use your phone and app plus sensor.

http://au.wahoofitness.com/devices/blue-sc.html

http://au.wahoofitness.com/devices/rflkt.html

Ricky

}SkOrPn--7
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby }SkOrPn--7 » Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:46 pm

mikesbytes wrote:Every so often we get asked about bike computers. My usual response to recommend a Garmin 500 as the minimum purchase however not everyone's bike computer budget stretches that far. And of course it boils down to requirements which can be a bit thin for those who haven't owned one before.

So here's some generic requirements;
- low price
- durability
- readability

In regards to capabilities suppose we can look at in levels;
1. Provides speed and distance and doesn't break at the first sign of water or a minor bump
2. Readability
3. Wired vs wireless
4. Additional basic inputs such as cadence
5. Ability to export summary info to a computer
6. Advanced inputs, ie heart rate and GPS
7. Ability to export detailed info to a computer and input into popular applications
8. Additional capabilities such as maps

So what about this budget one? http://www.velogear.com.au/cycling-acce ... puter.html
Mike I got one of those but doesn't do 5 through 8 in your list. Having said that it's in like new condition and if you want it to use it's yours for free including postage.

Ricky

User avatar
Duck!
Expert
Posts: 9877
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: On The Tools

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Duck! » Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:34 pm

Essential information for me is current & average speed, trip & total distance, and ride time.

Other features may become ncessary depending on an individual's specific targets.

GPS isn't a "must-have". In fact due to signal processing rates, and the fact that you're relying on satellites several hundred (thousands even) kilometres above the unit whose signals get bounced around or blocked by trees, buildings & stuff, a properly-calibrated wheel sensor-based computer can often be more reliable.
I had a thought, but it got run over as it crossed my mind.

User avatar
bychosis
Posts: 7272
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby bychosis » Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:22 pm

Duck! wrote:Essential information for me is current & average speed, trip & total distance, and ride time.

Other features may become ncessary depending on an individual's specific targets.
Plus one. A basic computer is enough to get started. Once you've ridden enough you can count your cadence a few times and estimate what it is easily morpst of the time. Cruising for me is 75-80, pushing 90-100, flat out at 120ish. HR is also nice to know, but can be reasonably estimated by perceived effort.

For ages I paired a cheap computer for the display with a separate HRM and used a phone app for GPS. Not as flash as a garmin, but unless you are following a specific training plan is perfectly fine for JRA (just riding along)
bychosis (bahy-koh-sis): A mental disorder of delusions indicating impaired contact with a reality of no bicycles.

SEQrider
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby SEQrider » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:31 pm

Before christmas I got a Magellan Cyclo 505 from 99 bikes for $299 that came with a free runners watch, which was used as a christmas gift to an inlaw. The 505 does everything, maps, cadence, speed, heart rate, ascent, temperature, time, etc, etc. very happy with it. It does pretty well everything the Garmin 810 does at about $200 cheaper.

User avatar
DavidS
Posts: 3639
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:24 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby DavidS » Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:12 am

I just need a basic computer.

I have a Cateye Strada, ticks just about every box for me except that it occasionally drops out. The issue is clearly the electrical connection in the mount, especially in the wet. 2 things occur to me: 1) why is the connection so small, and 2) why bother making it removable at all? I'd prefer if it was hard wired to the sensor, would be far more reliable. I never remove it anyway and from what I have observed neither does anyone else. That said, I have had it for a few years and the contacts do look a bit worse for wear, maybe I've just had it too long. Looked at the Padrone but I like the Strada, small and easy to read.

As for wireless, tried that. It dropped out way too often, way too unreliable. There must be too much interference as there were certain places it always dropped out, every single time. I gave up on it.

Now, if they would just make a nice simple computer which has the sensor hard wired to the display unit it would tick all the boxes for me.

DS
Allegro T1, Auren Swift :)

User avatar
singlespeedscott
Posts: 5510
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Elimbah, Queensland

Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby singlespeedscott » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:32 am

I use a Cateye Micro wireless on the bars and as my phone comes with me everywhere I use Strava to track and record the ride in my jersey. I have several Micro's in use on various bikes and they have proven to be very reliable with no signal. Battery life is usually 18 months to 2 years for the head unit and sender. It does everything I want, current and average speed, trip distance and time and the ever useful clock function. I think I have got all of mine for less the $50 a pop from ribblecycles.
Image

Nobody
Posts: 10332
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Nobody » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:51 am

DavidS wrote:I just need a basic computer.

I have a Cateye Strada, ticks just about every box for me except that it occasionally drops out. The issue is clearly the electrical connection in the mount, especially in the wet. 2 things occur to me: 1) why is the connection so small, and 2) why bother making it removable at all? I'd prefer if it was hard wired to the sensor, would be far more reliable. I never remove it anyway and from what I have observed neither does anyone else. That said, I have had it for a few years and the contacts do look a bit worse for wear, maybe I've just had it too long. Looked at the Padrone but I like the Strada, small and easy to read.
As you probably know by now, the Strada wired just needs to be removed from its mount and reseated now and then to clean the contacts. The cadence contact on the mount should eventually fail. I've had at least two go before I gave up on it.

I haven't had a computer on my bikes for a while now. Although I still manage to get enough exercise, I find my rides a bit more relaxing and/or less urgent between intervals as I'm not concerned about average speed. It also seems to make the ride a bit safer, since I'm mainly on bike paths. Not overly worried about being held up now, or having to slow down a lot to pass safer. If a put a computer back on, I just need to ignore the average speed.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22183
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby mikesbytes » Thu Jan 22, 2015 3:25 pm

Thanks Ricky, that seems to of made him happy.

Such a range of options at the low end of the market and each of the recommendations seems to have its merits

I use to have one that was called something like MiniG or something, was wireless and cost very little, even less than the cateye one, which is an excellent low end option.

Looking in the middle, I didn't know the Garmin200 did gps. does it upload data like the 500 and above do?
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

eeksll
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:36 pm

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby eeksll » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:03 pm

mitchy_ wrote:
}SkOrPn--7 wrote:
mitchy_ wrote:subscribed... also interested in a low cost option.
i currently just use my phone to track ride info, however am reluctant to carry it on the MTB as i can almost guarantee i'll land on it...

this one from Topeak looks like a decent option, ~$150 with a bluetooth speed/cadence sensor... anyone use one?
http://www.topeak.com/products/PanoBike ... r_w_scs_bk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have one and going to buy a second but while I don't use all the added extras it's a neat unit and works well plus the mount is nice. I got mine from Velogear so all up sensor and computer delivered was $159.00. Pushys also have them but at the time Velogear was better priced.

Ricky
cool cool. from what i can tell it doesn't have GPS built in, but can use it via your phone?

at ~$150 with the speed/cadence sensor, it seems more attractive than the Garmin 200, which doesn't have one (nor is it compatible)
I thought this quite interesting so I installed the app to have a look.

It does not appear to have a online repository you can upload to, nor does it look like you can export the rides at all e.g for putting on strava.

User avatar
Jean
Posts: 1754
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:26 am
Location: Canberra

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Jean » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:34 pm

singlespeedscott wrote:I use a Cateye Micro wireless on the bars and as my phone comes with me everywhere I use Strava to track and record the ride in my jersey. I have several Micro's in use on various bikes and they have proven to be very reliable with no signal. Battery life is usually 18 months to 2 years for the head unit and sender. It does everything I want, current and average speed, trip distance and time and the ever useful clock function. I think I have got all of mine for less the $50 a pop from ribblecycles.
This is my solution to a tee. I must say I'm a bit stunned at what some people think is an inexpensive bike computer or that someone would suggest the a Garmin anything is the basic starting point! Geez. I must be getting old & grouchy. I only use Endomondo on the mobile out of curiosity rather than for any real tracking value. Cateye's are dead reliable and the Micro Wirelesses I have have never suffered from water ingress or interference. As i recall I paid about $40 for each of mine from Wiggle at the time.

eeksll
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:36 pm

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby eeksll » Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:00 pm

Jean wrote:
singlespeedscott wrote:I use a Cateye Micro wireless on the bars and as my phone comes with me everywhere I use Strava to track and record the ride in my jersey. I have several Micro's in use on various bikes and they have proven to be very reliable with no signal. Battery life is usually 18 months to 2 years for the head unit and sender. It does everything I want, current and average speed, trip distance and time and the ever useful clock function. I think I have got all of mine for less the $50 a pop from ribblecycles.
This is my solution to a tee. I must say I'm a bit stunned at what some people think is an inexpensive bike computer or that someone would suggest the a Garmin anything is the basic starting point! Geez. I must be getting old & grouchy. I only use Endomondo on the mobile out of curiosity rather than for any real tracking value. Cateye's are dead reliable and the Micro Wirelesses I have have never suffered from water ingress or interference. As i recall I paid about $40 for each of mine from Wiggle at the time.
lol, when i read the OP about inexpensive quotes and then mikebytes linked a $90 computer I had a chuckle too.

But in his defence, when my cateye plays up (it constantly does) I start looking for a wireless copmuter with candence and they are not far short of $100, then its not far from GPS territory.

I just had a look on wiggle there is a cateye version of the topeak, it DOES allow upload to strava, atleast it appears that way. see http://www.this link is broken.au/cateye-strada- ... ce-sensor/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
DavidS
Posts: 3639
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:24 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby DavidS » Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:38 pm

Nobody wrote:
DavidS wrote:I just need a basic computer.

I have a Cateye Strada, ticks just about every box for me except that it occasionally drops out. The issue is clearly the electrical connection in the mount, especially in the wet. 2 things occur to me: 1) why is the connection so small, and 2) why bother making it removable at all? I'd prefer if it was hard wired to the sensor, would be far more reliable. I never remove it anyway and from what I have observed neither does anyone else. That said, I have had it for a few years and the contacts do look a bit worse for wear, maybe I've just had it too long. Looked at the Padrone but I like the Strada, small and easy to read.
As you probably know by now, the Strada wired just needs to be removed from its mount and reseated now and then to clean the contacts. The cadence contact on the mount should eventually fail. I've had at least two go before I gave up on it.
Removed many times and cleaned the contacts, still drops out sometimes. Mine doesn't have cadence, don't need it, so a slightly different model.

I'm now wondering if the micro wireless might be better.

DS
Allegro T1, Auren Swift :)

Nobody
Posts: 10332
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Nobody » Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:51 am

DavidS wrote:I'm now wondering if the micro wireless might be better.
It might, depending if the newer transmitter receiver sets are better than they used to be at overcoming the noise in the same parts of your ride. Only one practical way to find out really.

User avatar
KGB
Posts: 1629
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:49 pm

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby KGB » Fri Jan 23, 2015 7:27 am

Micro wireless was always my go-to until I moved to gps. Can usually be had for under $50, otherwise there is a similar sigma unit that I picked up for $40. Not as pretty as the cateye IMO but same features and still wireless.
I tried the phone thing for a while but the sampling rate wasn't great, leading to straight line sections on my ride maps, plus it chewed up battery.
For a while I used the cateye plus a garmin fore runner 110, their basic gps running watch. Worked really well just for downloading and logging rides.
Now I'm on a garmin 500.
Image

CKinnard
Posts: 3459
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:23 am

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby CKinnard » Fri Jan 23, 2015 7:43 am

If someone is really serious about budgeting, then they'll use strava on their smart phone. they even make waterproof brackets.

User avatar
Jean
Posts: 1754
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:26 am
Location: Canberra

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Jean » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:33 pm

DavidS wrote:
Nobody wrote:
DavidS wrote:I just need a basic computer.

I have a Cateye Strada, ticks just about every box for me except that it occasionally drops out. The issue is clearly the electrical connection in the mount, especially in the wet. 2 things occur to me: 1) why is the connection so small, and 2) why bother making it removable at all? I'd prefer if it was hard wired to the sensor, would be far more reliable. I never remove it anyway and from what I have observed neither does anyone else. That said, I have had it for a few years and the contacts do look a bit worse for wear, maybe I've just had it too long. Looked at the Padrone but I like the Strada, small and easy to read.
As you probably know by now, the Strada wired just needs to be removed from its mount and reseated now and then to clean the contacts. The cadence contact on the mount should eventually fail. I've had at least two go before I gave up on it.
Removed many times and cleaned the contacts, still drops out sometimes. Mine doesn't have cadence, don't need it, so a slightly different model.

I'm now wondering if the micro wireless might be better.

DS
My older Cateye wired computers would behave like that sometimes. The Micro Wireless units I have now have been faultless.

User avatar
Jean
Posts: 1754
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:26 am
Location: Canberra

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby Jean » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:38 pm

eeksll wrote:lol, when i read the OP about inexpensive quotes and then mikebytes linked a $90 computer I had a chuckle too.

But in his defence, when my cateye plays up (it constantly does) I start looking for a wireless copmuter with candence and they are not far short of $100, then its not far from GPS territory.

I just had a look on wiggle there is a cateye version of the topeak, it DOES allow upload to strava, atleast it appears that way. see http://www.this link is broken.au/cateye-strada- ... ce-sensor/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
While not as sleek as Garmin and the like in terms of software interface etc, Cateye Stealth GPS enabled computers start at around $80-$90. It may not be what people want out of a GPS computer, but the Stealth 10 & 50 are worth considering for GPS computers.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22183
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Recommending inexpensive bike computers

Postby mikesbytes » Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:01 pm

LOL eeksll, I try to steer towards the Garmin 500 package as the base level, which is what I use, but others don't see the need to shell out for it.

I've noticed Cateye getting into the same market as Garmin, do the cheapies like the Stealth record the ride so it can be uploaded to Strava or the like?
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot]