100 lumen vs 300 lumen
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby fat and old » Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:58 pm
Added consideration is run time on steady. After checking IP's assertion re full vs flashing mode over the last 8 weeks I have to agree. (Which surprised me because as a driver I see flashing better myself).
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 8:59 am
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby Scott2468 » Tue Jun 30, 2015 1:24 pm
http://reviews.mtbr.com/2010-mtbr-lights-shootout
Be aware there can be a big difference between lumens and "viewability". Lux is a better way to rate lighting for its practical use. I guess this is why most manufacturers do not use it. Another consideration is the battery and fade during each cycle.
- rangersac
- Posts: 1438
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:01 am
- Location: Southern Tasmania
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby rangersac » Tue Jun 30, 2015 1:57 pm
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby find_bruce » Tue Jun 30, 2015 3:40 pm
First some terms: Lux is a measure of how bright the light is at a particular point, Lumens is a measure of the overall amount of light. Lux is affected by the beam shape, while lumens is independent of beam shape. So a narrow beam or spot will have a higher lux measurement and will appear brighter, even though the lumen output is the same.
You can buy a cheap flux meter and measure it yourself. The real downside to lumens as a measure is that it needs a light integrating sphere, which is very expensive, hence the outright lies told about lumen output, particularly when claiming thousands of lumens. So while the 2015 MTBR light shootout says "Companies are becoming more honest with Lumen claims" this is only for the companies that submitted their lights for testing.
You will notice a difference between 100 and 300 lumens. Both Moon & Cateye are reasonably accurate in terms of light output.
The other issue to think about it beam shape. Because our eyes adjust to the amount of light, the issue is typically the relative brightness in the beam, either a hotspot in the middle or in the foreground.
The review of the volt 300 on MTBR includes beam shots, the full list.
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:55 pm
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby carcharias » Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:01 pm
I bought a USB rechargable light from another Taiwanese company, with a high lumen spec., only to find the beam is too spread, and does not have the throw I was expecting.This tends to annoy other cyclists and car drivers more than if it were more focused, and could be directed more toward the path/road.
I think Moon lights are very good, especially the X-power 500 model. The Moon will cost more $ than the Cateye...
Lumen rating should not be the deciding factor for choosing a light. There are many other aspects that need to be considered....
Just my thoughts...I could be wrong.
Have you considered the Moon Meteor 200 or the X-power 300/400? Merlin cycles sell these for good prices.
- flashpixx
- Posts: 746
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:04 pm
- Location: Maylands WA
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby flashpixx » Wed Jul 08, 2015 4:38 pm
Had the Moon Meteor 200. Was OK on lit paths but doesn't project enough light to be the sole source of light.rangersac wrote:You'll find the Cateye Volt300 will blow the Moon out of the water. On full beam I'm happy using it as my sole front light, and a long portion of my 56km daily commute is on unlit windy roads. At $63 from Bikebug it's money well spent.
Have a Volt 300 now. Excellent. battery lasts 6 hours on the high beam + flash mode. High beam projects enough light to safely ride at 30 kmh. Highly recommended, even more so at $65 odd.
Riding: Trek Domane SLR 7
- HiChris
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:14 pm
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby HiChris » Wed Jul 08, 2015 6:32 pm
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby fat and old » Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:50 am
Thanks peoples
- singlespeedscott
- Posts: 5510
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
- Location: Elimbah, Queensland
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby singlespeedscott » Mon Jul 13, 2015 10:53 am
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:55 pm
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby carcharias » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:04 pm
I would reckon the Cateye Volt 300 (bikebug $63) is a much better idea than Moon Meteor 200.
Turns out i am wrong again...
-
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:44 pm
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby softy » Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:44 am
I would diff go at least 300, if not more, I run 1200 lumens for night riding and when no streetlight put on high 2500 lumens. It might sound alot but it does not seem almost 10 times brighter.
If you like riding above 30km, you need to see debris and potholes, get good powerful lighting.
- ValleyForge
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:37 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: 100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby ValleyForge » Sat Aug 22, 2015 11:57 am
I guess it's TCO - higher initial cost but long life win here. Not had one fail in the wet, or on a long ride. I hate failure.
viewtopic.php?f=44&t=29725
- singlespeedscott
- Posts: 5510
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
- Location: Elimbah, Queensland
100 lumen vs 300 lumen
Postby singlespeedscott » Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:56 pm
Return to “Buying a bike / parts”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.