More low range at low cost?
-
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:27 pm
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby OldBloke » Mon Sep 07, 2015 3:34 pm
If I'm wrong blame Tapatalk.
-
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby find_bruce » Mon Sep 07, 2015 4:20 pm
Out of stock.am50em wrote:http://www.this link is broken/au/e ... prod106885
I was in a similar position and what I did was spend the extra $8 and went with deore m590 48 36 26 was right for my needs, but it also comes in 44 32 22.
To be honest though, as long as the crank has removable chain-rings (mine didn't) I would spend $12.50 on a 22t & see if that solved the problem, being aware of the point sharkey makes
-
- Posts: 2842
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:44 pm
- Location: Middle East, Melbourne
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby ironhanglider » Mon Sep 07, 2015 4:48 pm
I've also experienced the issues Sharkey points out, and as mentioned that issue goes away if you are not using the smallest cogs. I always try to avoid the small ring unless I need it, and if I need it I won't be using the smallest cogs.
Yes, do a test ride first, and if on the real thing you find yourself caught in too big a gear when fully loaded in traffic, there is always the option of a controlled stop and walking that bit rather than risk a dodgy change. After a couple of rides you will know where the critical points are.
Cheers,
Cameron
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby RonK » Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:55 pm
Where you're going a fairing might be better value.Espresso_ wrote:I'm moving to a (very) hilly area.
-
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby am50em » Mon Sep 07, 2015 10:23 pm
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6621
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Thoglette » Mon Sep 07, 2015 11:15 pm
True - wheel rebuild will cost some $ if you're not doing it yourself but not as much as much as a fancy new derailleurs, cassette and front crank + rings. But only an option if you get the hub cheaplyEspresso_ wrote:Sure but I'm going to be need of a wheel rebuild, shifter for that hub etc, right?
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:22 pm
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Espresso_ » Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:05 pm
Off to buy an Octalink BB to suit the new crankset.
E
-
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:22 pm
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Espresso_ » Mon Jan 04, 2016 3:35 pm
OK so I stuffed up - as per previous post I guessed I had an Octalink when I actually had a square taper (which I have now removed from the bike).Duck! wrote:[Acera is available in both square taper and Octalink splined forms, just note which one you currently have & get a new one of the same type.
Easier and cheaper to just buy an Octalink BB than to return the crankset, but there are 10,000 types of Octalink bottom brackets. I have a 68mm shell, and the M361 (8 Speed) crankset. Any tips on which Shimano Octalink BB I need?
I'm guessing an 126mm, but I guessed last time and got that wrong...
E
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Duck! » Mon Jan 04, 2016 7:14 pm
EDIT: A dig through Shimano product specs tells me that you do indeed need a 68x126mm ES-series BB.
- Bentnose
- Posts: 1327
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:00 am
- Location: N/E suburbs Melbourne, Victoria
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Bentnose » Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:04 pm
I sized a chain a little short as it was out of spec with a 26/36/48 and an 11-36 cassette, accidently managed to change into the 48-36 gear and locked up the whole drivetrain, had to take the back wheel off to free it up, when I undid the quick release the wheel virtually jumped off the bike. I've since added a 2nd quicklink and more links.
- Derny Driver
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:18 pm
- Location: Wollongong
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Derny Driver » Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:58 pm
You're a good bloke Duck. So lucky to have you on this forum.Duck! wrote: EDIT: A dig through Shimano product specs tells me that you do indeed need a 68x126mm ES-series BB.
How many people have you bailed out over the years...
-
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:22 pm
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Espresso_ » Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:14 pm
Yep - got a new chain lying around, but the cassette hasn't seen enough use since the last change for me to worry.Bentnose wrote:You may also need a new chain and cassette if your bike has had a bit of use, you'd notice it most on the small chainring.
E
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6621
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Thoglette » Sat Jan 09, 2016 1:17 pm
Derny and I don't always agree but on this I'm 100% with him. Your posts are always worth reading.Derny Driver wrote:You're a good bloke Duck. So lucky to have you on this forum.
So let me also say "Thanks" - it's most appreciated.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Duck! » Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:24 pm
One or two....Derny Driver wrote: How many people have you bailed out over the years...
-
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:22 pm
Re: More low range at low cost?
Postby Espresso_ » Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:44 am
Ok all sorted, finally, and with much thanks to Duck!Duck! wrote:The box the crankset came in should tell you what length bottom bracket is needed. Any Shimano ES-series Octalink BB in the appropriate length will work.
EDIT: A dig through Shimano product specs tells me that you do indeed need a 68x126mm ES-series BB.
After the bottom bracket incident, I found that the front derailleur wouldn't push the chain out enough to reliably engage the big ring. Nor would it shift reliably from the big to the middle ring.
So in another case of the women that swallowed a fly I bought a new Acera front derailleur, installed it and it works perfectly. And given these things cost $15, it was well worth it.
Low, low range achieved.
Thanks Duck
E
Return to “Buying a bike / parts”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.