Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
-
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 5:13 pm
Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby madmacca » Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:23 am
Hoping to reduce the long list by eliminating those bikes with more trouble-prone BB's.
So advice as to which BB standards to avoid like the plague would be appreciated. Hopefully based on more than a single anecdote.
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14848
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby MichaelB » Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:06 am
My suggestion is to also work out what crank you will be using, see if there is a good solution readily available (quality, not price).
The common consensus is to stick with a threaded BB (such as BSA or T47, but the T47 is not yet established ..), and then decide on a crank that will fit that frame.
Oh, and regular servicing too.
For my BSA frame and BB386EVO crank, the suggested BB adaptor (from a respected guy who specialises in quality bearings and does his own BB adaptors, but just not this specific one) was from Hope - the 30mm Threaded BB, but as mentioned in the article linked above, needs a special tool .
Currently, the BB & Tool are in transit from the UK.
My 5c worth.
What frame & material are you looking at ?
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby Duck! » Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:56 pm
-
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 5:13 pm
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby madmacca » Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:36 am
It is BB systems that are prone to noise or early failure, or are difficult to maintain that concern me.
Duck - if it is "dreadful", then I have just struck Trek from my list. Is your objection to BBright that it is proprietary, or that it has specific problems?
- 10speedsemiracer
- Posts: 4904
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:38 pm
- Location: Back on the Tools .. when I'm not in the office
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby 10speedsemiracer » Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:28 am
Not knowing what sort of bike you're looking at, or the $ range, it would be difficult to provide any sort of recommendations..
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14848
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby MichaelB » Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:57 pm
Whilst press fit BB's are not hard/complicated generally to service or get spares for, the noises that can come from them, and the cost to try and solve them make them a PITA. The more proprietary it is, the less options you have, and these are typically then more expensive.
BSA threaded BB is probably the key in terms of simplicity, reliability and availability.
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby rkelsen » Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:12 pm
- baabaa
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:47 am
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby baabaa » Sun Sep 23, 2018 10:18 pm
This would/could/may have helped...MichaelB wrote:Basically, the 'press fit' systems were primarily a way to reduce manufacturing cost, which then required 'marketing' to prove that it was better/stiffer/faster/saved power/etc/etc.
Whilst press fit BB's are not hard/complicated generally to service or get spares for, the noises that can come from them, and the cost to try and solve them make them a PITA. The more proprietary it is, the less options you have, and these are typically then more expensive.
BSA threaded BB is probably the key in terms of simplicity, reliability and availability.
https://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/ ... ems-45660/
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14848
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby MichaelB » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:26 am
in what way ?baabaa wrote:
This would/could/may have helped...
https://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/ ... ems-45660/
Just really a different sized BSA. It is indeed better than the basic pressfit solution, but then misses the point of reduced manufacturing costs. Hasn't been widely adopted yet, so may still not survive.
- ldrcycles
- Posts: 9594
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Kin Kin, Queensland
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby ldrcycles » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:31 am
- baabaa
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:47 am
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby baabaa » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:49 am
Sorry was vague, should have noted in terms of press fit bb squeaking only.MichaelB wrote: in what way ?
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10596
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby find_bruce » Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:38 pm
Especially rocking horse dung ones like megatech ?ldrcycles wrote:BB standards to avoid? Any that are unthreaded.
-
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:41 pm
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby march83 » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:13 pm
My cross bike also was BB30 with a SRAM adaptor to bring it down to 24mm. No issues except for occasionally needing new bearings because it saw so much bad weather and water. Again, I guess I was lucky.
My Cervelo roadie with BBRight makes the odd click and crack as I roll up the driveway but then shuts up completely. Other than that I have no issue with it. About 10000km so far.
I have PF30s in my mountain bikes, 1 has an EBB in it and the other has a praxisworks -> 24mm adaptor in it and both have been fine for around 5000km each.
My commuter has a standard 24mm threaded and has had 10000km on a shimano bb with no issue, then I swapped it out for a 30mm BSA30 so I could run a quarq and it has had about the same, again with no issue.
I'm currently building 2 bikes at the moment. A new commuter frame to replace the one I'm using now which I don't really like, and a new cross frame to replace a frame I broke. I think it's an indication of the market - both are BSA bottom brackets. I didn't chase these standards specifically, but I'm reasonably happy that I've got them.
- ldrcycles
- Posts: 9594
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Kin Kin, Queensland
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby ldrcycles » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:16 pm
VERY especially!find_bruce wrote:Especially rocking horse dung ones like megatech ?ldrcycles wrote:BB standards to avoid? Any that are unthreaded.
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby Duck! » Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:49 pm
My beef is that it's a proprietary system, moreso than any built-in flaws it may have, which afflict Trek's BB90. As a mechanic in a non-Cervelo (or Trek for that matter) shop, it means I can't just grab a standard - in the correct sense of the word - bottom bracket off the shelf and chuck it in. I have to find a (usually) third-party supplier who has a compatible unit in their range and order it in, which extends the time the bike is in the shop.madmacca wrote: Duck - (snip) Is your objection to BBright that it is proprietary, or that it has specific problems?
10speedsemiracer wrote:...... Trek have apparently shifted away from Enduro bearings, for reasons unknown.
Changing bearing supplier won't fix a thing with BB90. The problems lie with the tooling the frames are made off, and changing bearing supplier won't fix anything. If Trek haven't made new, properly-sized BB shell tooling plugs, the system is still f*%^ed regardless of what bearings are in it.
- 10speedsemiracer
- Posts: 4904
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:38 pm
- Location: Back on the Tools .. when I'm not in the office
Re: Bottom Bracket standards to avoid?
Postby 10speedsemiracer » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:30 pm
agree entirely, if the shell inside diameter is off, different bearings won't make any difference. Just thought it was interesting is all and wondering if it's a case of deflection or misdirection on Trek's part (it's not us it's the bearings). Maybe they should be including an industrial-sized bottle of Loctite blue with each Trek frame sold...Duck! wrote:......Changing bearing supplier won't fix a thing with BB90. The problems lie with the tooling the frames are made off, and changing bearing supplier won't fix anything. If Trek haven't made new, properly-sized BB shell tooling plugs, the system is still f*%^ed regardless of what bearings are in it.
Return to “Buying a bike / parts”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.