Cannondale v Merida v Trek
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:02 am
First post, so be gentle...
Currently, I'm riding a Trek FX 2 for commuting, but I've started riding more often and also doing slightly longer rides at the weekend, so I'm looking to upgrade. Commuting is going to be my bread and butter (approx 10km to the Melbourne CBD) so I'm looking for a flat bar - I've tried drops but they're not for me, especially when I'm bombing down Exhibition Street first thing in the morning.
I've looked at three new contenders for a new bike - the Cannondale Quick 3, with carbon forks, disc brakes and the Shimano Sora groupset. Other options are the Merida Speeder 400 with the same setup but 105 groupset. The option is the Trek FX 4 (Tiagra) but the frame doesn't feel like a significant change from the FX 2, despite the carbon forks.
I loved the Cannondale; it felt lighter, more responsive and significantly faster than my current ride and felt like a proper upgrade to my current ride.
Thoughts?
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:29 pm
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14853
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby MichaelB » Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:41 pm
Can't help specifically with those bikes mentioned.
Seems like you have actually test ridden them which is a good start. At the end of the day, they are good brands with good level of components. Whilst Sora may be a level or two below 105, it also depends on which year they are. Often, the previous years 105 is the same as this years Tiagra (for example).
And for what you want to do riding wise, they serve you well.
If amongst the three that you have tested, the price is equal, the one that makes you smile is the one to go for.
Enjoy !!
- rodneycc
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:50 pm
- Location: Melbourne Eastern Suburbs, Victoria
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby rodneycc » Wed Nov 07, 2018 5:08 pm
I've recommended the Merida Speeder 400 in the past so I know its a solid bike choice. The Cannondale name is a quality brand so you know the frame will be good and Sora components are a lot better than they use to be (but the 105 should be a lot slicker on the Merida). If the Cannondale is the bike that does it for you then don't hesitate to grab it if it ticks all the boxes better than the others and feels like a really good upgrade. Another to put on your test list is the Giant Cross City 0 disc . A really nice flatbar bike, prob the best I've test ridden a few years back now though.
Flat bar vs Drop bar is a matter of choice and your riding conditions. Drop bars are good at distance rides with hand placements so with me rides over 30kms I were having a few troubles with my hands and the drop bar solved all those issues. But if you are not doing longish rides with lots of small commutes then flatbar whatever you like mostly is fine. The Giant Contend is a good bike also the Defy Advanced for the $$ if you are getting right into it.
Also just remember sizing is everything. So a couple of mm here and a mm there make a huge difference so most important is get the size right first time or you will be going back for bike #2 before you know it!
Anyway all the best.
2013 Lynskey Helix;2013 XACD Ti Di2
2013 Giant TCR Adv SL1;2014 Giant Defy Adv SL
- Duck!
- Expert
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: On The Tools
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Duck! » Wed Nov 07, 2018 10:21 pm
Not true at all. Shimano currently work on a four-year production cycle for their groupsets, with only minor, if any mid-model updates. The overall design theme trickles down through the levels with each subsequent year to give a family resemblance, but the technical & construction material specs tend to remain fairly constant - and distinctly different at each level - across the generations. The only time Tiagra has matched (well, in reality surpassed) 105 was with the previous-generation 4600-series, the first 10-sp. version of that level, which passed over the hidden gear cable design shifters in favour of the older exposed cable design (which were in fact rejigged previous-generation Dura-Ace), which worked a lot better. In all other respects the previous-generation 105 was still technically superior.MichaelB wrote:Often, the previous years 105 is the same as this years Tiagra (for example).
- 10speedsemiracer
- Posts: 4904
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:38 pm
- Location: Back on the Tools .. when I'm not in the office
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby 10speedsemiracer » Wed Nov 07, 2018 10:58 pm
which is also Tiagra 10sp, hydraulic brakes etc etc
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14853
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby MichaelB » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:43 am
Cheers for the clarification. Probably meant to write 'generation' instead of 'years'.Duck! wrote:Not true at all. Shimano currently work on a four-year production cycle for their groupsets, with only minor, if any mid-model updates. The overall design theme trickles down through the levels with each subsequent year to give a family resemblance, but the technical & construction material specs tend to remain fairly constant - and distinctly different at each level - across the generations. The only time Tiagra has matched (well, in reality surpassed) 105 was with the previous-generation 4600-series, the first 10-sp. version of that level, which passed over the hidden gear cable design shifters in favour of the older exposed cable design (which were in fact rejigged previous-generation Dura-Ace), which worked a lot better. In all other respects the previous-generation 105 was still technically superior.MichaelB wrote:Often, the previous years 105 is the same as this years Tiagra (for example).
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:06 am
I'll keep you posted
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:16 am
I agree the Treks are solid rides - I love my FX 2. Felt that the frame on the Cannondale was a little lighter and absorbed the road more, but it's hard to tell.10speedsemiracer wrote:Of the 3, I like the Trek from a bang-for-buck perspective. Tiagra is fine for your use, and a step up from the Sora on the Cannondale. Has a nice mix of components, and there's a reason we see so many Fx's floating around as commuters. Tough as nails. For the money though, another option would be the Giant Fastroad SL1
which is also Tiagra 10sp, hydraulic brakes etc etc
-
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 9:12 pm
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Ivanerrol » Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:40 am
When I tested out the Merida Speeders they seemed very “hybridish”. i.e. a very upright seating position.
This may or might not be part of your criteria.
Some of those bikes labelled “flat bar road bikes” are really hybrids. The more you spend on the line of bikes the more faltbarish they seem to become. i.e. Speeder 900 or 500 or the more expensive Specialized Sirrus range equipped with road components rather than mtb stuff.
You really need to ride them to make sure you get what’s comfortable or what you desire.
I ride bikes with endurance geometry. Riding on the hoods is not much different than the true flatbar.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:58 am
That's a fair point and I guess my main criteria is something that I can ride a little quicker/longer than the FX 2 and something that I can happily ride through traffic. I'm testing a few out this weekend so I'm going to be interested to see how I get on with the drop bars. There is a certain degree of comfort and security with flat bars (for me) and maybe i need to get out of that comfort zoneIvanerrol wrote:I.M.H.O.
When I tested out the Merida Speeders they seemed very “hybridish”. i.e. a very upright seating position.
This may or might not be part of your criteria.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:51 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby 1Rowdy1 » Fri Nov 09, 2018 3:26 am
- Mububban
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:19 pm
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Mububban » Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:58 pm
When I was cross shopping road bikes, I didn't expect to feel much difference as I don't have years of experience and can't pick up on subtle nuances. however I was surprised to find out how much of a difference in "smile factor" I found with different bikes in the same sort of category. Some I rode and they did nothing for me, although I'm sure they're capable and would not disappoint. But one in particular just put a huge smile on my face and felt brilliant compared to the others.Rawshack wrote:I loved the Cannondale; it felt lighter, more responsive and significantly faster than my current ride and felt like a proper upgrade to my current ride.
All the bikes you've listed will serve you well, but test ride them all, and buy the one you can't stop thinking about riding
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:17 am
My first stop was at 99 Bikes in Clifton Hill to try the Merida 400 Speeder flat bar and the Scultura 400 roadie. Very similar bikes, both fitted out with the 105 groupsets, but the Speeder had carbon forks and disc brakes. I took the Speeder out first and it was good. Solid ride, the gears shifted crisply and I was able to bomb around my test circuit much more comfortably than on my FX 2. However, going up a hill back to Queens Parade, I realised that I was struggling a little and when I finished, I couldn't escape the feeling that it wasn't going to be the significant change from my current hybrid.
So I swapped over to the Scultura and I had my 'road to Damascus' bike moment. I zipped through my circuit and then ate that climb for breakfast (it was 11am by that time, so probably more brunch, but never mind). Holy Cow. Now I got why I had been struggling so much on my morning commute. Great bike and I thought I had a winner.
However, my sensible self (actually, more my partner) suggested I go try that Giant Contend 1 before I committed to anything. So, off we trekked to the Giant Store on Lygon street. After a little back and forth I finally got on the bike and hallelujah... I found my ride. A lower spec than the Scultura (going down from the 105 groupset to a Sora), but the frame just felt that little more comfortable... the tires that little more comforting to someone coming to their first road bike. The shifting was crisp and solid and I glided down Lygon street with no qualms at all zipping around the increasingly busy Saturday morning traffic.
I also got a solid deal on the 2018 model, so overall very, very happy and now I can see why so many people were suggesting I try the drop bar over the hybrids. Only thing to note is that I swapped out the factory fit 25mm tires to a set of puncture resist 28mm.
Thanks to everyone for their help
Al
- 10speedsemiracer
- Posts: 4904
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:38 pm
- Location: Back on the Tools .. when I'm not in the office
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby 10speedsemiracer » Mon Nov 12, 2018 11:11 am
- Mububban
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:19 pm
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Mububban » Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:32 pm
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:38 pm
- Mububban
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:19 pm
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Mububban » Tue Nov 13, 2018 11:31 am
Ooooh yeah......6 months is optimisticRawshack wrote:I think I'll be posting in six months asking for advice on my next upgrade
I was having major upgraditis, but then life got in the way. So plans for a new bike were shelved, instead I was able to afford a $800 wheel upgrade which transformed the bike.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:16 am
It's been three weeks of solid riding the Contend and well, I'm not sure I love it. Sure, it's a step up from the Trek and I'm riding 20km almost every day - something that I don't think is possible with the Trek and yes, it's way more fun than the Trek too. Even the Sora groupset is a step-up from the mountain bike mishmash was on the old bike.
But.... (we knew there was a but coming, right?)
But it doesn't feel like the step up that I was maybe expecting. While the Contend is a solid ride, there's a huge emphasis on the 'solid' part. I don't know the exact weight, and Giant doesn't advertise it either, but it doesn't feel a whole lot lighter than the FX2, which tips the scales around the 12kg mark. Maybe it's those bombproof but oh-so !! BAN ME NOW FOR SWEARING !! 28mm gators that aren't helping, and maybe the mammoth d-lock I cart is another problem... but I can't help but feel that it's not the Billy Bragg-esque great leap forward I was hoping for and to be honest, I can't help but wish I'd maybe cast my net a little wider and invested a little more up front.
I have 99 problems and a not it seems that a bike is one...
Rawshack out.
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:51 pm
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby fergy1987 » Wed Dec 05, 2018 11:57 am
N+1 is the scariest mathematical equation in the world to a bank balance
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Wed Dec 05, 2018 12:07 pm
That's what people are telling me but I can't justify or have space for 2 bikes...fergy1987 wrote:Looks like the Contend is about to become the commuter and a new carbon bike is making its way into your hands
N+1 is the scariest mathematical equation in the world to a bank balance
- rodneycc
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:50 pm
- Location: Melbourne Eastern Suburbs, Victoria
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby rodneycc » Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:52 pm
Some smart guy once told me that the bike only feels heavy when your mind and body is weak.... Then he said - wax on, wax off... Na only kidding I made that bit up
2013 Lynskey Helix;2013 XACD Ti Di2
2013 Giant TCR Adv SL1;2014 Giant Defy Adv SL
- 10speedsemiracer
- Posts: 4904
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:38 pm
- Location: Back on the Tools .. when I'm not in the office
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby 10speedsemiracer » Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:58 pm
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:57 am
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Rawshack » Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:17 am
Not sure that the frame is worth the upgrade. It's a very, very heavy frame and I think I'm better saving the pennies for a better bike.rodneycc wrote:Campy Zondas or Shimano Rs81 (or whatever the equiv is nowdays).
I'm 71kg and I ride almost everyday. Still feels heavyrodneycc wrote:Maybe most important lose some weight and work on the fitness. And ride, ride ride and ride more and then the bike won't feel as heavy
- Mububban
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:19 pm
Re: Cannondale v Merida v Trek
Postby Mububban » Thu Dec 06, 2018 3:26 pm
My Contend SL1 Disc in Large size weighed 9.45kg without pedals.Rawshack wrote:Not sure that the frame is worth the upgrade. It's a very, very heavy frame and I think I'm better saving the pennies for a better bike.rodneycc wrote:Campy Zondas or Shimano Rs81 (or whatever the equiv is nowdays).
I'm 71kg and I ride almost everyday. Still feels heavyrodneycc wrote:Maybe most important lose some weight and work on the fitness. And ride, ride ride and ride more and then the bike won't feel as heavy
While removing tyres and tubes to rotate tyres, I weighed the stock PR-2 wheels, with QR skewers and disc rotors attached - 1.095kg front, and 1.305kg rear (1.625kg including Shimano 105 cassette in 11-32 = 320g).
Minus ~130g per wheel for the stock rotors and ~35-40g for F/R QR skewers and you roughly get:
- 930g front wheel
- 1140g rear wheel
I replaced the stock wheels with Prime carbon 38mm wheels and it transformed the bike, to the point where I now don't feel the need to buy a lighter carbon bike. Saving <600g on wheels makes climbing and maintaining speed so much better.
Prime RP-38:
Front - 856g (705g bare wheel + 115g Ultegra rotor & lock ring + 36g QR skewer)
Rear - 1291g (845g bare wheel + 115g Ultegra rotor & lock ring + + 41g QR skewer + 290g Ultegra cassette)
I paid about $850 for the carbon wheels. If I had my time again I might have gone for these Hunt alloy wheels (I found them after ordering the Prime wheels) - even cheaper and a touch lighter than the Primes:
https://www.huntbikewheels.com/collecti ... eep-22wide
Return to “Buying a bike / parts”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.