Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22207
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby mikesbytes » Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:54 am
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 9:12 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Ivanerrol » Sun Apr 21, 2024 3:57 pm
The Police need to setup a task force with staff qualified to check power ratings and top speeds. Laser speed detectors used.Andy01 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2024 8:52 amAnd therein lies the problem - you have a bunch of f@#*wits, and I include drongos with suspended licences, suspended sentences etc, freaky adrenalin junkies (like the son mentioned in the article) and moron parents who buy their kids things without checking laws etc - they are often the people buying and using these things, and they completely disregard the current laws or plead ignorance - so tighter regs will do nothing.
I would suggest that probably half of the schoolkids I see using escooters, ebikes & electric motorbikes in Brisbane are illegal - simply because of them being under 16yo - and that is before we even start on the other laws like helmets, speed, multiple occupancy etc - add those in and the number probably jumps to 75% illegal. And the parents plead ignorance - because they couldn't be bothered checking before buying, or monitoring/policing the use of the device by their kids.
An outright ban where you just can't buy them unless you manage to get a fully black market deal (like an illegal firearm) is the only way to stop them and that will never happen because they are (somewhat correctly) viewed as a environmentally friendly transport option.
I think that additional policing of existing laws is required and much more importantly, enforcing the laws with harsh penalties. One strike and you get a fine, second strike you get a VERY heavy fine and third strike you lose the device immediately, no questions asked. And if all three happen at the same time (eg. a 15yo speeding on a path without a helmet), then the above applies - $2000 fine and loss of device. Something like that might slow things down, maybe.
Blitzes on E devices.
Point of sale. There should be a legal certificate written in Big letters advising the device is restricted by speed and power. Should be signed by legal purchaser and seller.
These largish E Bikes such as the Dironi's work out to many thousands of dollars purchase price. Kids aren't paying for these - Parents are
-
- Posts: 14565
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby warthog1 » Sun Apr 21, 2024 4:01 pm
Agreed.mikesbytes wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:54 amEven if it was legal to ride the device on public land, rego wouldn’t stop the mods as it’s near impossible to enforce it. Rego hasn’t stopped Harley riders from fitting illegal exhaust systems
So sick of hearing the noisy, agricultural, lister genset, sounding things.
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:37 am
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby zebee » Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:41 pm
That's another enforcement failure. There was a time a few years ago when NSW cops were pinging loud bikes and making them get their pipes tested and stamped. But they don't bother now.mikesbytes wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:54 amEven if it was legal to ride the device on public land, rego wouldn’t stop the mods as it’s near impossible to enforce it. Rego hasn’t stopped Harley riders from fitting illegal exhaust systems
ANother problem with enforcing e-bikes is that many of them are modifiable via phone app. So get stopped, fire up your app, re-do your parameters and you pass the test.
The only way really is point of sale and forbid non-compliant imports. Could probably stop the big places like JB HiFi but not buying over the net or small garage shops.
Else you have to spend a heap of cash on enforcement. And add impounding to the law so any bike deemed non-compliant is confiscated. If you have that then it might be effective to have cops with radar guns looking for people not pedalling.
-
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:18 pm
- Location: North Shore - Sydney
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Scott No Mates » Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:46 pm
I'm drafting
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22207
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby mikesbytes » Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:52 pm
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21736
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby g-boaf » Sun Apr 21, 2024 8:15 pm
Same with cars, it's up to individuals to complain and report to the EPA and no other way unless a heap of people complain about a particular car to the Police.zebee wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:41 pmThat's another enforcement failure. There was a time a few years ago when NSW cops were pinging loud bikes and making them get their pipes tested and stamped. But they don't bother now.mikesbytes wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:54 amEven if it was legal to ride the device on public land, rego wouldn’t stop the mods as it’s near impossible to enforce it. Rego hasn’t stopped Harley riders from fitting illegal exhaust systems
It's hard to deal with illegal e-devices. The easy way is to ban the lot, but it makes it hard on those who rely on them to get around.
-
- Posts: 12272
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
-
- Posts: 2991
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Mr Purple » Mon Apr 22, 2024 8:20 am
Yes, this.
It's quite easy to ban just the ones being ridden illegally. You just ban them all. I'd estimate less than 1% of the 'big' e-scooters, e-unicycles and e-fat bikes (i.e. motorbikes) I see are actually being ridden legally.
It it were up to me, and as you've suggested in the past, Jason - the standards would be based on the weight and size of the device. Plus I'd also have another requirement based on tyre width for e-bikes. Very rare to see e-bikes with tyres of over about 3 inches width being used legally - because that's motorbike sized. They're motorbikes.
Speaking of which I think I've complained about the dingbat at school pickup riding his 50cc scooter sized 'e-scooter' without plates into the school grounds to pick up his kid. I saw him again on Friday, he literally starts it with a key in an ignition switch. That's a motorbike. Took off through the schoolground doing 30km/hr+.
- Mububban
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:19 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Mububban » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:55 am
Edit - just checked the link and the dead guy was dressed very similarly. Didn't help him apparently.
I suggest that if you are "a single dad with a 6 year old child" then perhaps you need to put aside the adrenaline junkie stuff for a few years...
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6633
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Thoglette » Mon Apr 22, 2024 5:51 pm
Remember: Anything that gets people (including these clowns) out of their cars’n-trucks is a good thing.
The clowns are much more likely to cause serious damage behind the wheel of a two-ton vehicle tgan on an e-thing.
It’s just not as newsworthy.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21736
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby g-boaf » Mon Apr 22, 2024 6:59 pm
They still cause serious problems when they fly along at 70km/h or more and then knock other people off bicycles, etc. that doesn’t help getting more people to ride bicycles when they are at risk from these folks doing the wrong thing.
-
- Posts: 12272
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby jasonc » Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:46 pm
Pedestrians are in the firing line with these things. SOMETIMES cyclists and Pedestrians are in the firing line when on the road. I can hear cars coming. These things are quieter than EVs
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21736
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby g-boaf » Mon Apr 22, 2024 8:02 pm
Same with the trail bikes. It's not much but they appreciate it.
-
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:06 am
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby hunch » Tue Apr 23, 2024 8:16 am
The local community group here had a sarcastic piece in the local newsletter last week about Council patting itself on the back about getting the NSW govt to put out a pamphlet late last year about road rules for e-devices, while scofflaw behaviour increased.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6633
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Thoglette » Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:35 pm
I’m not arguing with that. Nor that more policing won’t help. Nor on a ban on the import of grossly non compliant e-things.
However, these same types of people are a whole lot more dangerous behind the wheel of a car. Or worse, a large truck.
Two cyclists hit on a single day on the Nullarbor? Someone dying after driving straight into the back of a stationary bus? Barely cracks the news.
But the evils of scofflaw scooter riders, now that’s worthy of many column inches and much ranting on on the radio.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21736
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby g-boaf » Tue Apr 23, 2024 5:16 pm
Different things, and the riders hit on the Nullabor deserves separate attention. I assume you are lobbying the authorities on that equally as you are posting here?Thoglette wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:35 pmI’m not arguing with that. Nor that more policing won’t help. Nor on a ban on the import of grossly non compliant e-things.
However, these same types of people are a whole lot more dangerous behind the wheel of a car. Or worse, a large truck.
Two cyclists hit on a single day on the Nullarbor? Someone dying after driving straight into the back of a stationary bus? Barely cracks the news.
But the evils of scofflaw scooter riders, now that’s worthy of many column inches and much ranting on on the radio.
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14928
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby MichaelB » Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:01 am
Sadly, until it is someone in power or famous, or their direct relative will it become anything important.
The example of the cyclists on the Nullabor is a simple, but very sad example of why nothing will change ....
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6633
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Thoglette » Sun Apr 28, 2024 3:42 pm
Not as much as I used to: in the last few years my focus has been in other areas. That's at an end, so I'm currently working out what form will be most effective as the old mechanisms (e.g. writing to the paper) are mostly broken. Maybe threadworthy on its own.
(I've been trying to post here less, too. Dunno if it's working.)
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:37 am
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby zebee » Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:40 pm
I think it has to be multi pronged.Thoglette wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 3:42 pmNot as much as I used to: in the last few years my focus has been in other areas. That's at an end, so I'm currently working out what form will be most effective as the old mechanisms (e.g. writing to the paper) are mostly broken. Maybe threadworthy on its own.
(I've been trying to post here less, too. Dunno if it's working.)
Bike advocacy groups are one avenue as they can have some access to government ministers. Hit or miss that of course as some are better than others. And some ministers are more open than others.
Your local member is always worth a try. A well written real letter is a rare enough thing to be noticed. More than one from different people to several members even more so.
Need a few clickbait stories to dripfeed to what is left of the media. I'm sure you know the sort of thing... Someone either photogenic or pitiable with a sob story or an outrage story.
Also need solutions. Pollies like it a lot better if you can give them something achievable (meaning that does not majorly threaten the private car or rich people walking to the coffee shop, and where enforcement is cheap). The e-thing is complicated by imports being a Federal issue and enforcement being a State one. The Feds would be the ones stopping stuff coming in to the country, so anything like that has to start there.
-
- Posts: 9811
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby human909 » Sun Apr 28, 2024 6:51 pm
100% agree.
Here in Melbourne illegal mobility devices are everywhere, in fact they probably outnumber legal mobility devices. Most of these are delivery e-bikes that don't require pedalling and are over 200W, though there are also plenty of questionable scooters.
But 99.9% of users are just trying to get around efficiently and safely. They normally use the roads. I don't encounter many issues.
The 0.1% of idiots, are better off being idiots on these devices than in cars. It is mostly a people issue not a vehicle issue.
Yep. The 0.1%. That same 0.1% likely cause problems as pedestrians too and regularly cause deaths as motorists.
-
- Posts: 12272
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby jasonc » Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:03 am
One of the people that is in/runs multiple Bike advocacy groups up here thinks PMDs are great.
-
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 9:56 am
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
-
- Posts: 2991
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby Mr Purple » Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:30 am
Yep. I cancelled my membership with them as a result.
It was getting to the point where something like 90% of their social media posts were featuring PMDs. When I looked at their board members last year when I decided to cancel my membership - literally only one of them stated they actually rode bicycles.
Looks like they're had an overhaul since then with some actual cyclists on board. Hopefully that'll sort a few things out.
-
- Posts: 12272
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Tougher E-thing laws proposed to deal with e-thing scoff-laws
Postby jasonc » Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:36 am
Personally-owned legal/legally ridden PMDs are near non-existent up here. As I have said before, I think I see one legal personally owned PMD a weekblizzard wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:20 amLegal PMDs are great, more people out of cars, more investment in infrastructure but the illegal ones and their knuckle dragging riders ruin it.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.