That is exactly how it is, it seems to me too.
Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
-
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby warthog1 » Wed Nov 08, 2023 7:20 pm
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21521
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby g-boaf » Thu Nov 09, 2023 6:20 am
The self driving technology will keep getting better over time as manufacturers develop it more.Comedian wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 4:34 pmelantra wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 4:00 pmI’m sure that the antecedents to this tragedy will be a complex train of unfortunate events, like most large scale disasters (trains, planes and automobiles) there are usually multiple contributing factors.Mr Purple wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 3:00 pm
Straight out of the 'Australian Fitness to Drive' book.
Insulin Treated Diabetes.
A person is not fit to hold an unconditional licence.
A conditional licence may be considered to at least two yearly review providing whether the criteria are met:
- The condition is satisfactorily controlled.
- there is no recent history of a 'severe hypoglycaemic event'.
- The person is following a treatment regimen that minimises the risk of hypoglycaemia and
- The person experiences early warning symptoms of hypoglycaemia.
So this is covered reasonably well in there.
While there are some situations where it would be difficult to tell the onset of hypoglycaemia they are relatively unusual (that's what they're insinuating has caused this crash). I would suggest that there may have been a series of very poor decision made on the day otherwise - including potentially the speed with which the vehicle was driven. Looking at the intersection and location on google maps suggest there was a fair bit involved.
I agree this individual should not be driving again for the foreseeable future.
The Australian Fitness to Drive book is provided free of charge to most or all GP clinics in Australia.
And as was mentioned a few posts above, (elderly) people do sometimes “doctor shop” to find a GP who will give them the tick in the box.
This scenario most commonly occurs in urban areas where their “usual” GP has told them that it’s time to give up driving but there are plenty of other GP’s in the adjacent suburbs who are less familiar with the patients history.
It’s not hard to postulate solutions to many of these problems.
The most obvious solution would be to make it mandatory for ALL Insulin dependent diabetics to have their drivers license renewal assessment done by a DIABETES SPECIALIST (Endocrinologist)
Yes this would be an added expense to either the driver or to Medicare but look at all the expensive stuff that Medicare or NDIS does pay for already.
I would rather see my tax dollars go to preventing any future Daylesford disaster scenario than some other things that consumes mega public dollars.
I also might add that I suspect that this disaster would not have occurred if the vehicle was not an Automatic transmission car.
A manual transmission car would probably have stalled and stopped before the full extent of the carnage occurred.
Just throwing this out there.. why did the car allow it to happen? I'm pretty sure the big T would have sounded the alarm when it thought things were going badly and slammed on the brakes if you didn't act.
I do not think for a second that we should rely on autonomous systems but still.. I am unwilling to drive at a wall to confirm this idea. I can say though - the one time it was really worried I was going to hit something (right turn across me) it hit the brakes HARD.. like full pressure. Was not mucking around.
Should people on restricted licences be forced to drive certified cars. ?
From the manual...
Automatic Emergency Braking
Model Y is designed to determine the distance from detected objects. When a collision is considered unavoidable, Automatic Emergency Braking is designed to apply the brakes to reduce the vehicle's speed and therefore, the severity of the impact. The amount of speed that is reduced depends on many factors, including driving speed and environment.
When Automatic Emergency Braking applies the brakes, the touchscreen displays a visual warning and sounds a chime. You may also notice abrupt downward movement of the brake pedal. The brake lights turn on to alert other road users that you are slowing down
Automatic Emergency Braking operates only when driving between approximately 5 km/h and 200 km/h.
Automatic Emergency Braking does not apply the brakes, or stops applying the brakes, when:
• You turn the steering wheel sharply.
• You press and release the brake pedal while Automatic Emergency Braking is applying the brakes.
• You accelerate hard while Automatic Emergency Braking is applying the brakes.
• The vehicle, motorcycle, bicycle, or pedestrian is no longer detected ahead.
Automatic Emergency Braking is always enabled when you start Model Y. To disable it for your current drive, touch Controls > Autopilot > Automatic Emergency Braking. Even if you disable Automatic Emergency Braking, your vehicle may still apply the brakes after detecting an initial collision to reduce further impact (see Multi-Collision Braking on page 126).
Limitations and Inaccuracies
Collision Avoidance features cannot always detect all objects, vehicles, bikes, or pedestrians, and you may experience unnecessary, inaccurate, invalid, or missed warnings for many reasons, particularly if:
• The road has sharp curves.
• Visibility is poor (due to heavy rain, snow, fog, etc.).
• Bright light (such as from oncoming headlights or direct sunlight) is interfering with the view of the camera(s).
• A camera or sensor is obstructed (dirty, covered, fogged over, covered by a sticker, etc.).
• One or more of the sensors (if equipped) is damaged, dirty, or obstructed (such as by mud, ice, or snow, or by a vehicle bra, excessive paint, or adhesive products such as wraps, stickers, rubber coating, etc.).
• Weather conditions (heavy rain, snow, fog, or extremely hot or cold temperatures) are interfering with sensor operation.
• The sensors (if equipped) are affected by other electrical equipment or devices that generate ultrasonic waves.
The sensors are also way better these days especially with manufacturers using multiple different ones that can be cross referenced to avoid mistakes like concrete centre dividers slowing the car down erroneously or weather conditions causing incorrect results.
I want the technology to be more and more tested and developed because I trust the computers not to deliberately close pass me and shout out the window “geroff the road” or to U turn and start chasing me..
Pretty sure that x5 driver had he been in a newer car with all the semi autonomous safety tech would have been stopped. The car would have slammed the brakes on and corrected the steering.
If you have seen any of the modern Merc like an S Class or C Class (or others from last few years) how they react in such situations (even on the proving grounds) they will really really violently slam on the brakes along with steering corrections if necessary. Things like wrong way driving it will warn about and try to stop, that’s a fairly common old driver failing which has previously resulted in sobering consequences.
Apologies in advance to the off topic police…
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby Comedian » Thu Nov 09, 2023 7:35 am
- baabaa
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:47 am
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby baabaa » Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:57 am
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/ ... t-category
Speed limiters will soon be required for lorries in lower weight category
To improve road safety, all lorries must soon be equipped with a speed limiter if their maximum laden weight is between 3,501 and 12,000kg.
Kolette Lim
UPDATED 3 NOV 2023, 6:01 PM SGT
SINGAPORE – To improve road safety, all lorries must soon be equipped with a speed limiter if their maximum laden weight (MLW) is between 3,501kg and 12,000kg. This will ensure that these vehicles do not exceed the speed limit of 60kmh.
Lorry owners can start installing the devices in 2024, said the Traffic Police (TP) in a statement on Friday. Drivers will be given up to three years to do so, depending on the MLW and registration date of the vehicle.
Currently, it is compulsory for goods vehicles with an MLW exceeding 12,000kg to have a speed limiter installed.
“The speed limiter regime aims to improve road safety and driving behaviour. It complements other measures intended to reduce fatalities and injuries among all road users,” said the TP.
For lorries registered before 2018, a speed limiter must be installed before 2026 if their MLW is between 5,001kg and 12,000kg, and before July 2026 for those with an MLW of between 3,501kg and 5,000kg.
For newer lorries registered from 2018, drivers will have to install the device before 2027 if the MLW of their vehicle is between 5,001kg and 12,000kg, and before July 2027 if the MLW is between 3,501kg and 5,000kg.
Speed limiters will also be required for imported lorries to be approved from 2026. Relevant documentation should be submitted to the Land Transport Authority during the vehicle’s pre-registration.
[/i]
-
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby warthog1 » Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:41 am
Probably by the time we are 78Comedian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 7:35 amI agree with all of that. I also agree that telling grandpa at 78 he can't drive his 20 year old car because it doesn't have enough safety tech is going to be a real tough sell. These systems have only just reached the point where they are becoming ubiquitous. It's going to be many years until they filter down.
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby Comedian » Thu Nov 09, 2023 10:17 am
At this rate I'll still be driving a very very old landrover by then.warthog1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:41 amProbably by the time we are 78Comedian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 7:35 amI agree with all of that. I also agree that telling grandpa at 78 he can't drive his 20 year old car because it doesn't have enough safety tech is going to be a real tough sell. These systems have only just reached the point where they are becoming ubiquitous. It's going to be many years until they filter down.
-
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby warthog1 » Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:37 am
I'll be tottering around in an old Patrol perhaps too.Comedian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 10:17 amAt this rate I'll still be driving a very very old landrover by then.warthog1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:41 amProbably by the time we are 78Comedian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 7:35 amI agree with all of that. I also agree that telling grandpa at 78 he can't drive his 20 year old car because it doesn't have enough safety tech is going to be a real tough sell. These systems have only just reached the point where they are becoming ubiquitous. It's going to be many years until they filter down.
Though I doubt I'll be able to afford to fuel it or get in the damn thing by then.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6628
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby Thoglette » Fri Nov 10, 2023 11:00 pm
SUV and ute sales slowed due to NZ’s Clean Car Discount – expect that to reverse under a new government
Lots of links to studies and some nice twitter links
Closes with:
The sad irony is that the dominance of SUVs and utes reduces the ability of communities to create safer streets that would encourage more walking and cycling.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 1550
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby am50em » Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:15 am
https://theconversation.com/ive-always- ... cars-98559Overall, mid-size vehicles — whether conventional passenger or SUVs — strike the best balance between protecting occupants and other road users.
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby Comedian » Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:45 am
An old article but interesting. From a purely engineering perspective small vehicles are generally easier to make crash well simply because there is less energy to manage. So if you intent to run into a stationary object the small car might be just as good.am50em wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:15 amhttps://theconversation.com/ive-always- ... cars-98559Overall, mid-size vehicles — whether conventional passenger or SUVs — strike the best balance between protecting occupants and other road users.
In reality though - there are many other factors. Manufacturers might not put as much safety equipment into small cars due to cost. In addition the age of the vehicle's design is likely to have a bearing as everything is evolving (although the pace of physical safety improvements has declined in recent years).
But the elephant in the room is of course compatibility with other vehicles.
I agree with the idea proposed in here. It would be good if we had a weight based tax that was significant enough to change peoples behaviour and make them choose smaller cars. Plus an advertising ban based on weight. Please!
-
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby warthog1 » Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:07 am
We have owned a Camry and my son still has one. The current Tucson my wife drives is similar in size to a CX5.
Just a better car for our Australian road environment imo. Less scraping on approach and departure angles due to more ride height however, more significantly, better suspension travel to cope with potholed whoops that are our main and secondary highways. What used to bottom the Camry, particularly when loaded, the Tucson just cruises over.
I dont live in the city and have no interest in a low rider sled that cant cope with our sh itty roads in normal use.
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- redsonic
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:08 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby redsonic » Fri Nov 17, 2023 12:58 pm
-
- Posts: 2922
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 1:14 pm
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14873
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
-
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 9:56 am
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby blizzard » Sat Nov 18, 2023 10:24 am
https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/g ... -australia
-
- Posts: 1550
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby am50em » Sat Nov 18, 2023 11:26 am
- DavidS
- Posts: 3639
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:24 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby DavidS » Sat Nov 18, 2023 9:03 pm
DS
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21521
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
- antigee
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:58 am
- Location: just off the Yarra Trail but not lurking in the bushes
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby antigee » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:14 pm
It is the first time the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has blocked an SUV advert on the grounds of breaching social responsibility in an environmental context.
The regulator barred two ads, first released in a 2020 campaign: a poster and a video shown on social media, where dozens of Toyota Hilux cars drive across off-road terrain, including a river, while a voiceover describes the scene as “one of nature’s true spectacles”. The vehicles then join a road and drive through an urban area, before a lone car enters a driveway, with the voiceover continuing: “Toyota Hilux. Born to roam.”....
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/ ... al-grounds
Veronica Wignall, a co-director at Adfree Cities, said: “These adverts epitomise Toyota’s total disregard for nature and the climate, by featuring enormous, highly polluting vehicles driving at speed through rivers and wild grasslands.”
Wignall said there was a disconnect between the way SUVs were advertised – with campaigns often depicting them in rugged environments – and the reality of where they were largely driven....
- baabaa
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:47 am
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby baabaa » Sat Nov 25, 2023 8:19 am
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/13/12125892 ... ffic-lanes
Bigger cars and trucks are leading to more pedestrian fatalities : NPR
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/14/12127370 ... crash-data
- redsonic
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:08 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby redsonic » Sat Nov 25, 2023 10:49 am
The article didn't explain how the study proved causality rather than correlation. It could be that wider traffic lanes tend to be installed on much busier roads, with sheer numbers increasing the likelihood of crashes there. They needed to do a longitudinal study, looking at crash statistics before and after road width is changed.baabaa wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2023 8:19 amSkinny roads save lives, according to a study on the width of traffic lanes : NPR
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/13/12125892 ... ffic-lanes
Narrower roads mean cyclists are squeezed more (unless the reclaimed space is dedicated to peds/cyclists); also motorbikes and scooters can't filter to the front of traffic queues as easily, thus discouraging their use. If car parking is allowed alongside a narrow road, pedestrians can find it harder to see and be seen before crossing the road.
- elantra
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:01 am
- Location: NSW and QLD
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby elantra » Sat Nov 25, 2023 7:08 pm
Yes it’s a complex equation and obviously skinny roads are going to prevent (some) road trauma death and injury due to speeding - but this might not include people on bicycles, and might be misleading if the conclusion lacks validity because motorists who want to go fast are using an alternative road.redsonic wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2023 10:49 amThe article didn't explain how the study proved causality rather than correlation. It could be that wider traffic lanes tend to be installed on much busier roads, with sheer numbers increasing the likelihood of crashes there. They needed to do a longitudinal study, looking at crash statistics before and after road width is changed.baabaa wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2023 8:19 amSkinny roads save lives, according to a study on the width of traffic lanes : NPR
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/13/12125892 ... ffic-lanes
Narrower roads mean cyclists are squeezed more (unless the reclaimed space is dedicated to peds/cyclists); also motorbikes and scooters can't filter to the front of traffic queues as easily, thus discouraging their use. If car parking is allowed alongside a narrow road, pedestrians can find it harder to see and be seen before crossing the road.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/nu ... %20coffee.
Attributing Causality to human behaviour (or designs that modify human behaviour) is actually a complex science with many pitfalls.
This is the science of Epidemiology, and the so-called “confounding variables” have caused people - even scientists - to come to incorrect conclusions many times in the past.
Reference to the highlighted section in the work linked to above URL.
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby rkelsen » Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:04 am
Commenter: "the electricute..."Comedian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 12:56 pmGood news everyone!
https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/f ... -australia
- uart
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Study: SUV Drivers Cause 55% Worse Injuries To Bicyclists They Hit
Postby uart » Sun Nov 26, 2023 3:14 pm
LOL, great news for anyone else who wants to park in that car park.Comedian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 12:56 pmGood news everyone!
https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/f ... -australia
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.