Choice test of lights
- suspectinoz
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:06 pm
- Location: Kiama, NSW
Choice test of lights
Postby suspectinoz » Mon May 05, 2008 10:57 am
Choice Test
_(AT)
_- \,
(*)/ (*)
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Postby mikesbytes » Mon May 05, 2008 12:58 pm
- suspectinoz
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:06 pm
- Location: Kiama, NSW
Postby suspectinoz » Mon May 05, 2008 1:12 pm
Doesn't appear so, but I've asked BV for the full article, let you know when I see it.mikesbytes wrote:Interesting. Did they also consider reliability?
_(AT)
_- \,
(*)/ (*)
Postby Hawkeye » Mon May 05, 2008 1:35 pm
An excellent question.mikesbytes wrote:Interesting. Did they also consider reliability?
My experience of items branded "Power Beam" has not been good in regard to reliability. The one featured on the Choice site I've not tried and it seems to be built differently from the 4/5-LED white front light I tried so it may be better. I'm done with taking changes on them, though.
I wonder if they tested them in the rain?
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Postby mikesbytes » Mon May 05, 2008 1:59 pm
- simonn
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:46 am
- Location: Sydney
Postby simonn » Mon May 05, 2008 2:12 pm
My fiance bought a subscription to Choice when we bought our unit, and therefore many white goods, a few years ago.mikesbytes wrote:Interesting. Did they also consider reliability?
They do long term tests, which is what is really needed for reliability, and also ask long term users for their opinions.
However, in our experience the models in the long term tests are no longer available in retail stores by the time the test is completed, so all you have to go on is brand. In these days of outsourcing, though, this means nothing as the new model could have been made by different people, in different factories, owned by different companies in a different countries.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Postby mikesbytes » Mon May 05, 2008 2:35 pm
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Postby Aushiker » Mon May 05, 2008 3:34 pm
mikesbytes wrote:Interesting. Did they also consider reliability?
According to what is stated at the link, it does not appear so. They state:
AndrewA panel of 10 judges from the cycling community — including police, government, retailers, community groups and CHOICE — assessed the lights at night at a distance of 200m and also at 50m, with the lights angled at 45° (to simulate the bike approaching an intersection). The flash rate (where applicable) was also assessed.
Our test was conducted on a suburban road with a popular cycle path, and during the test several cyclists passed by with very weak bike lights (or none at all). You should check your bike lights periodically. If they’re looking a bit dim, change the batteries.
Our test showed that all the lights were visible at both distances, but some clearly outshone the rest.
Aushiker.com
- LuckyPierre
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Canberra, ACT
Postby LuckyPierre » Mon May 05, 2008 4:59 pm
ps. no, I haven't bitten the real bullet and bought the Ayup road set yet, but I can see one in my future.
pps. I still think that, in a commuting context, helment-mounted lights are a hazard for other riders / road users, despite their ability to 'attract drivers' attention'
ppps. I used helmeted-mounted lights in my only serious night-time offroad adventure (the Scott 24Hour) and would prefer not to imagine having to do without them ever again.
Alchemy Diablo - Columbus Zonal tubing, Ultegra 9-speed groupset, UltraGatorskins
Gitane Rocks T1 - U6 tubing, Deore/XT groupset, CrossMarks
- Bnej
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
- Location: Katoomba, NSW
Postby Bnej » Mon May 05, 2008 5:33 pm
Most people grossly underestimate the amount of light you need for a bike. If you're on the road you're competing with car headlights and a 5 LED flasher while better than nothing isn't anywhere near enough.
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Postby Aushiker » Mon May 05, 2008 5:47 pm
Whilst not wishing to distract from your point which I also agree with and would only use these lights as secondary lights as you suggest, I think one should take the test results on-board in a manner consistent with the testing, i.e., on a shared path. Whilst I haven't read the full article, going by the link, these lights where tested on a shared path and therefore should be only considered as suitable in that context. One should be careful in my view from extending these results to other riding contexts. [Maybe this last point should be made more clearer in the link and/or article].Bnej wrote:The Basta Polaris with a 1/2 watt LED would be acceptable as a secondary light, but none of those are really headlights.
Most people grossly underestimate the amount of light you need for a bike. If you're on the road you're competing with car headlights and a 5 LED flasher while better than nothing isn't anywhere near enough.
Regards
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- Bnej
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
- Location: Katoomba, NSW
Postby Bnej » Mon May 05, 2008 6:01 pm
I think it's representative of what most bike users will spend on their lights, as most bikers will spend $80 tops on a set of front & rear lights. On a shared path with street lights at low speed this is probably OK. Probably for shared paths it might even be better than higher end lights, as you are closer to other users and don't want to dazzle them.Aushiker wrote:...on a shared path. Whilst I haven't read the full article, going by the link, these lights where tested on a shared path and therefore should be only considered as suitable in that context. One should be careful in my view from extending these results to other riding contexts....
But even a 1w LED doesn't invoke the give-way response that a pair of 3w Crees does.
I think Choice are making a good roundup of what most people will buy, but it's certainly not representative of the best of what's available if you bump your budget up to a 5 year investment instead of a grudging mandatory expense.
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Postby Aushiker » Mon May 05, 2008 6:26 pm
I agree. I thought it was interesting to me from the perspective of a front flasher which I run in-conjunction with my main lights and rear lights.Bnej wrote:I think Choice are making a good roundup of what most people will buy, but it's certainly not representative of the best of what's available if you bump your budget up to a 5 year investment instead of a grudging mandatory expense.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Postby Parrott » Mon May 05, 2008 6:56 pm
It was a grudging mandatory expense I spose as I would rather spend what little left over money from the family budget we have on stuff to make the bike faster . I know I'm not going to be going to fast if I am squashed by a car, but this is hopefully better than the lousy little 1 led flasher I have http://www.torpedo7.com.au/products/SULIHNNHFBnej wrote: a grudging mandatory expense.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Postby il padrone » Mon May 05, 2008 7:12 pm
Because I tried a Canondale 1W LED light powered by 3 AAAs and was sorely disappointed. Initially great beam, but I only got about 1.5 hours of battery life, and it was dimming rapidly at the end. Also seems to have some intermittent fault in the connections, causing it to flicker of and on irregularly. Grrr!!
I bit the bullet and went for a B & M S6 sidewall dynamo with their 1W LED headlight. Gives great lighting for around town and on country roads in my experience. And sustained light output, without any worries about whether the batteries are fresh/charged.
IME 10W + lights are really just overkill for road use. Great on off-road trails at night, but your vision and need for illumination of the track is much different to on-road situations. I've ridden for many years at night with a 3W halogen, and still have this on my Audax bike, powered by the venerable but very free-running Sanyo Dynapower. Never have too much problem being seen by other vehicles.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:07 pm
Postby bonecrusher » Mon May 05, 2008 8:44 pm
I would generally agree but i think it a brighter light would be useful especially early dawn commute where people are sleepy and not alert in their cars. I was almost side swiped as a motorist pulled out from a T intersection and had no clue as she didn't even notice until I almost rubbing up against her door and yelled out at her. I thought I had my front LED light off but when I got to work they were still on and flashing.il padrone wrote: IME 10W + lights are really just overkill for road use. Great on off-road trails at night, but your vision and need for illumination of the track is much different to on-road situations.
I have a 10W niteflux on order which I will use in the mornings and night through the winter. Flashing mode is useful on lit roads to get attention of cars cyclists pedestrians. It will be handy at night when I ride through Rookwood Necropolis and Homebush Bay Olympic park tracks and road. I will just as handy for my pre dawn starts as well.
Waterproof is important for commuting especially when it starts bucketing like it had been last month.
It surprises me now many cyclists try to ride around Olympic park at dusk/ evenings with no lights. They are not only invisible to cars but also other cyclists etc. GRRRR..
- Bnej
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
- Location: Katoomba, NSW
Postby Bnej » Mon May 05, 2008 9:54 pm
Well a Cateye HL530 with 4xAA gives a good 10 hours bright and probably 50 more of passable but dimming. It's less than they claim but not too bad.il padrone wrote:What's the battery life on a 1W LED powered by 4 AAAs going to be?
Because I tried a Canondale 1W LED light powered by 3 AAAs and was sorely disappointed....
4xAAA should give 4 or 5 hours for decent light. Or so you'd think... A single 1w LED light gives enough light to see by as long as you're not going more than about 20km/h, or if you're traveling on roads with streetlights.
If you're going to get that SUN light why not get two so you can have a bit of extra width when people see you? They're cheap enough!
I could not go back to a 1w LED now. I think a single 3w Luxeon LED & a secondary multi LED is okay for cruising/touring/commuting, but if you're picking up some serious speed you probably want more.
Flashing lights are okay as a last resort, but a constant beam headlight is essential if you want cars to be able to judge your speed and be able to give way. A flashing light will not cue a give-way response when you ride through intersections a lot of times.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Postby il padrone » Mon May 05, 2008 10:50 pm
Really?? I'm no electrical techie. So why did my 1W light die after barely 2 hours?Bnej wrote:Well a Cateye HL530 with 4xAA gives a good 10 hours bright and probably 50 more of passable but dimming. It's less than they claim but not too bad.il padrone wrote:What's the battery life on a 1W LED powered by 4 AAAs going to be?
Because I tried a Canondale 1W LED light powered by 3 AAAs and was sorely disappointed....
Well I'd beg to disagree. I've found the 1W B&M LED to be very good at 25-30kmh in various night time situations. Including riding the black night roads into Port Arthur in Tassie. Lots of illumination, and to a good distance. Maybe over 40kmh it might be a bit short on the beam, but I kinda doubt it. Shall have to go out one black night and ride a few dark streets to check.Bnej wrote:A single 1w LED light gives enough light to see by as long as you're not going more than about 20km/h, or if you're traveling on roads with streetlights.
No thanks. Happy to use my 1W LED dynamo lightBnej wrote:If you're going to get that SUN light why not get two so you can have a bit of extra width when people see you? They're cheap enough!
Agree with this very much.Bnej wrote:[Flashing lights are okay as a last resort, but a constant beam headlight is essential if you want cars to be able to judge your speed and be able to give way. A flashing light will not cue a give-way response when you ride through intersections a lot of times.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Bnej
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
- Location: Katoomba, NSW
Postby Bnej » Mon May 05, 2008 11:09 pm
Well, your B&M is probably a bit different to the Cateye I was using, but my experience was:il padrone wrote:Well I'd beg to disagree. I've found the 1W B&M LED to be very good at 25-30kmh in various night time situations.
~40km/h on lit street - this is all right.
~20-25 on partially lit streets - good value I got here
~40km/h on unlit winding downhill - holy crap I can't see the corner I'm going to die brake brake brake....
I'd give it a bare pass at 30km/h but on a black unlit winding road I didn't think it was enough at all. Probably if I were riding flattish terrain and straighter roads it would be more usable.
My opinion of Cateye remains that they make mid-range products at top-end prices.
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Postby Parrott » Mon May 05, 2008 11:18 pm
I thought about getting two of those sun lights but also got a tube and some neoprene overboots and that cleaned me outBnej wrote:
If you're going to get that SUN light why not get two so you can have a bit of extra width when people see you? They're cheap enough!
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14853
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Postby MichaelB » Tue May 06, 2008 8:49 am
So what is this unit like ? Thinking of getting an additional light for night riding.Bnej wrote: [
Well a Cateye HL530 with 4xAA gives a good 10 hours bright and probably 50 more of passable but dimming. It's less than they claim but not too bad.
How many hours on flashing output ? Is the 10 hours listed with it on full time ?
Cheers
Michael B
- Bnej
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
- Location: Katoomba, NSW
Postby Bnej » Tue May 06, 2008 9:00 am
It's okay, it's a bit big, decent commuter light.MichaelB wrote:So what is this unit like ? Thinking of getting an additional light for night riding.Bnej wrote: ...Cateye HL530 with 4xAA...
How many hours on flashing output ? Is the 10 hours listed with it on full time ?
No flashing mode, just on/off. It's waterproof, with a magnetic switch at the back. Mounting hardware is okay but a rubber shim or automotive mounting tape will improve the grip on the bars.
They claim 10 hours at full brightness and 90 at partial, but after it starts dimming it's time for a recharge.
The beam pattern is usably wide & even with a somewhat pointless small bright spot in the middle.
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Postby Aushiker » Tue May 06, 2008 9:10 am
Are you aware of or can you point to research which supports this perspective?Bnej wrote:Flashing lights are okay as a last resort, but a constant beam headlight is essential if you want cars to be able to judge your speed and be able to give way. A flashing light will not cue a give-way response when you ride through intersections a lot of times.
My opinion which is based on observation of other riders is that I find constant beams are less noticeable on the road and bike paths. I would go further to suggest that on shared paths besides roads, constant beams blend in way to much with the road and hence it is more difficult to determine the location of the rider until they are much closer than I would like at times. I find flashing lights better in these conditions.
Also I suspect that drivers equate flashing lights with bikes more so than constant beams.
Personally I go with both on my commuter and in low light (dawn/dusk for example) run the flasher and then turn on the constant beam once it gets darker.
I run a Blackburn Quadrant at present and one of its advantages in my view is that it is visible from the side as well as in front and hence offers a small advantage over lights which are directed to the front only. Oh it is also big and ugly ... that helps too
Regards
Andrew
Aushiker.com
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], uart
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.